Thank you all for your detailed answers.
Indeed, sounds like we will need some lawyer advice...
My gut feeling is that we are going with the BSD license with day one. I am
relatively new to open source myself (Been developing most of my work on
closed source UNIX systems and windows), but I hope
Hi all,
I am a part of a team that is planning to open a start-up company.
We plan to ship a revolutionary storage controller.
We are now investigating possible OS for the product. The choices that we
came up with are either LINUX or Free-BSD.
I am strongly biased toward Free-BSD, however I still
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:58:14AM +0300, son goku wrote:
[...]
Browsing the web about the BSD license just made me confused. Seems like to
understand these licensing issues you must be a lawyer.
Basically the BSD licence is: do what you like, but:
1. don't say you did it all by
Jonathan Chen wrote:
4.Suppose the answer for 1-3 is no, s there any other reason why I need to
open the code.
Only if you feel like it.
I'd make that, Only if you feel like it or would like the warm glow of
giving back to the community (and of course all those extra eyes to
audit and
Thanks guys for the prompt answers!!!
It seems weird that code that uses dtrace must be opened. I mean every
serious production level application must have some dtrace-like mechanism
inside to collect online information when needed. It is a shame that because
of licensing issues, I will have to
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 8:42 AM, son goku ryu.pla...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks guys for the prompt answers!!!
It seems weird that code that uses dtrace must be opened. I mean every
serious production level application must have some dtrace-like mechanism
inside to collect online information
On 27 jul 2009, at 14:42, son goku wrote:
Thanks guys for the prompt answers!!!
It seems weird that code that uses dtrace must be opened. I mean every
serious production level application must have some dtrace-like
mechanism
inside to collect online information when needed. It is a shame
