On Tue, 26 May 2009 23:14:10 -0400, Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca wrote:
...unfortunately, due to re-racking and upgrade requirements, I have to
pull the plug. There is nothing hidden or obfuscated in my output, and I
am not ashamed of that.
Maybe there's a way of patching the uptime utility
Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2009 23:14:10 -0400, Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca wrote:
...unfortunately, due to re-racking and upgrade requirements, I have to
pull the plug. There is nothing hidden or obfuscated in my output, and I
am not ashamed of that.
Maybe there's a way of
On Tue, 26 May 2009 19:01:46 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote:
here it is:
divert(0)dnl
VERSIONID(`$FreeBSD: src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.submit.mc,v 1.1
2003/10/19 00:03:13 gshapiro Exp $')
define(`confCF_VERSION', `Submit')dnl
define(`__OSTYPE__',`')dnl
Steve Bertrand wrote:
[..snip..]
Just a little bit of sadness of having to 'down' it,
[..snip..]
radius# uptime
1:19AM up 553 days, 15:56, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
:(
radius# halt
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Steve,
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca wrote:
Steve Bertrand wrote:
[..snip..]
Just a little bit of sadness of having to 'down' it,
[..snip..]
radius# uptime
1:19AM up 553 days, 15:56, 1 user, load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
:(
radius# halt
That
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
Maybe there's a way of patching the uptime utility that it adds
the previous uptime of the system (since last shutdown) to the
actual uptime. I know this denies everything uptime stands for,
let's call it accumulated uptime.
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
You can make ZFS work on i386, but it requires very careful tuning and
is not
going to work brilliantly well for particularly large or high-throughput
filesystems.
you mean high transfer like reading/writing huge files. anyway not
faster than properly configured
101 - 107 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
