On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:12:05AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
What is it that this Debian GNU/kFreeBSD ships in those 7 DVDs?
Please ask that on one of their mailing lists; it's out of scope for
the two mailing lists you posted to.
mcl
___
You're the first one to ask in a while. Since our userbase is small,
and developer time is limited, we've never set it up.
Right now I'd just be happy if I can get all the major ports to work :-)
mcl
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 05:07:18PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
in case it matters, I see
nexus0: syscons type unknown (no driver attached)
nexus0: memory-controller mem 0x400-0x47 type
memory-controller (no driver attached)
messages on boot.
I
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 05:32:31PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
Do you honestly think the probability of Tuomo suing us is higher of,
say, me suing, well, us?
Yes. That is exactly what I am saying. And I believe reading the entire
thread when this first came up supports my claim.
mcl
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 03:45:46PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
Now it's LGPLv2.1 with the only restriction that this software may not
be significantly changed while being distributed as ion3.
I hate to replay this whole issue from the beginning, but apparently there
is no other way.
The
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 02:58:23PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
No need to, if it works fine and there are no objections for it,
I'll commit it to the tree.
I insist that you not to commit it to the tree. See my other post.
mcl
___
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 03:05:08PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
I've seen the license change too. I'm working on the port currently.
As a reminder, the last time this software was in the ports tree, the
developer threatened us with a lawsuit. This repeats what he has
previously done to
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 02:57:52PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
Ports lang/gcc43, 44 and 45 fail to build on 8.0-beta2 ia64:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40959
I know they build fine on 6.4-stable alpha, but what about sparc64?
amd64? mips?
You can check things like this
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 03:51:24PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I wonder if they work under ia64 linux?
I don't know. A quick check of NetBSD seems to indicate that their ia64
port only runs in emulation mode; OpenBSD doesn't list an ia64 port.
mcl
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:09:23PM +0800, FBSD1 wrote:
An alternate solution to this problem is to allow users to upload missing
packages
one word for you: security.
What you suggest is never, ever, going to be implemented, due to the
total lack of security.
mcl
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:42:18AM -0500, Scot Hetzel wrote:
So you are advocating that port maintainers have to create packages
for all the supported FreeBSD architecture's (amd64, arm, i386, ia64,
mips, pc98, powerpc, sparc64, sun4v). That would be 9 packages
needing to be created at the
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:02:14PM +0800, joeb wrote:
How does kdenetwork-kopete-0.12.8 or php5-gd or pdflib fit into those
reasons you gave?
A little research shows:
ftp://ftp4.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/All/php5-gd-5.2.6_2.tbz
So, there is a current package for
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:55:20AM -0700, mdh wrote:
email the FreeBSD Foundation and find out how much cash it'd take for
additional hardware to make that a reality, then send them that much cash.
We are actually set up ok on amd64 machines right now (incremental
package builds take just
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 06:48:27PM +0200, Redd Vinylene wrote:
Why does FreeBSD pack so much, pardon my language, bullshit anyway?
Because no one has done the necessary QA work to factor things out
and make them work.
mcl
___
* I am trying to understand what is different about the ISC
configuration but have not yet found the cause.
It's called Anti-FreeBSD bias. You won't find anything.
If this is true, please try to explain to me the following:
- ISC hosts 5 Netra 1s that comprise most of our sparc64 package
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:26:20AM -0300, Jason Hills wrote:
Yeah, Kris mentioned something like that in a private mail, but google
didnt help me, nor http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-announce/ :(
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?461FE03C.8000406
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:00:08AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 05:57:56PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
Hi Kris,
I know things must be pretty busy with 6.2, but is there any chance that
the 5.5-STABLE packages can be updated soon? I just checked again, and
at least
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 11:53:31AM +0300, Abdullah Al-Marrie wrote:
I just don't feel the current bug system is good for the FreeBSD
growing community
This question has been extensively discussed on various mailing lists
over the past 2 years. The migration problem is not as easy as you
seem
This has already been fixed. Please re-cvsup and try again.
mcl
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 02:04:55PM +0300, Panagiotis Astithas wrote:
I believe that one solution to the scalability problem of creating and
maintaining updated packages, would be to decentralize it more. Each
time I submit an update for one of the ports I maintain, I've already
build the
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 10:56:35AM +0400, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
I use the last port collection, but there is only 2.3.11 version of pppd
there. Are there any plans for updating it?
The first place you should always ask about plans to update a port is
the maintainer. If the maintainer is
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 09:14:26AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Why are you building xfree86? FreeBSD 5.4 uses Xorg. It's
just about the same code just different licensing. I don't think the
FreeBSD core is bothering to keep the xfree86 port working on FreeBSD 5.X
just FreeBSD 4.11
I'm
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 02:45:45PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I'm sorry to step on the toes of the port maintainer but instead
of complaining about it you need to respond to the realitites.
In general I would rather do that than argue, yes.
make: don't know how to make /drm.h. Stop
***
23 matches
Mail list logo
