Le Tue, 2 Dec 2008 08:57:58 -0800,
Don O'Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
With all the discussions of ZFS lately, I'm beginning to wonder if
it's really ready for a production environment. Concerns over memory
utilization, speed, stability, etc...
So, my question is this... If you were
what file system would you choose? What options are out there besides
UFS and ZFS? What FS's are least likely to have corruption issues
when there are power hits?
May be UFS + gjournal.
I use gjournal since FreeBSD 7.0 and it seems to work fine.
is it really smart enough to not write
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
what file system would you choose? What options are out there besides
UFS and ZFS? What FS's are least likely to have corruption issues
when there are power hits?
May be UFS + gjournal.
I use gjournal since FreeBSD 7.0 and it seems to work fine.
is it really smart
I use gjournal since FreeBSD 7.0 and it seems to work fine.
is it really smart enough to not write everything twice or am i wrong?
It writes everything twice :)
(but every journaling system has to write something twice)
there is a big difference between something (metadata, short data
Le Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:21:19 +0100 (CET),
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
I use gjournal since FreeBSD 7.0 and it seems to work fine.
is it really smart enough to not write everything twice or am i
wrong?
It writes everything twice :)
(but every journaling system has to
I don't know how Gjournal works, but it works below the filesystem (so
^^
next lines shows you actually know.
thanks for answer, for me it's definitely not worth using, i would prefer
waiting for fsck every few months or less than to have much slower writes
i think
With all the discussions of ZFS lately, I'm beginning to wonder if it's
really ready for a production environment. Concerns over memory utilization,
speed, stability, etc...
So, my question is this... If you were building a brand new 6.3/7.0 server
with decent performance (dual core, 32 Bit OS -
With all the discussions of ZFS lately, I'm beginning to wonder if it's
really ready for a production environment. Concerns over memory utilization,
no
speed, stability, etc...
So, my question is this... If you were building a brand new 6.3/7.0 server
with decent performance (dual core, 32
Don O'Neil([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2008.12.02 08:57:58 -0800:
With all the discussions of ZFS lately, I'm beginning to wonder if it's
really ready for a production environment. Concerns over memory utilization,
speed, stability, etc...
From everything I've read people use it in production
