Re: updated ports tree

2004-04-24 Thread Killermink !
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where did you look, and what is missing? I was trying to get a package for XFCE4. Maybe there is no package available due to all the components and dependencies, so I built from source, and then I wanted to create a package so I could install again without using the

Re: updated ports tree

2004-04-24 Thread Killermink !
it doesn't actually seem that bad to install it! I am stil interested for the answer though... Thanks Killermink Original Message Follows From: Joe Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killermink! [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: updated ports tree Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 21:52:00

Re: updated ports tree

2004-04-24 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 09:45:20AM +, Killermink ! wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where did you look, and what is missing? I was trying to get a package for XFCE4. Maybe there is no package available due to all the components and dependencies, so I built from source, and then I

updated ports tree

2004-04-23 Thread Killermink !
Hello all, I am about to (re)install FreeBSD 5.2.1, and wish to make sure I have the latest ports afterwards. I do not really wish to install the whole ports tree from sysinstall as disk space is at a premium, and i will (soon) have a fast internet connection so seems pointless when i am only

Re: updated ports tree

2004-04-23 Thread Joe Altman
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:04:06PM +, Killermink ! wrote: Hello all, I am about to (re)install FreeBSD 5.2.1, and wish to make sure I have the latest ports afterwards. I do not really wish to install the whole ports tree from sysinstall as disk space is at a premium, and i will (soon)

Re: updated ports tree

2004-04-23 Thread Killermink !
... Original Message Follows From: Joe Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killermink! [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: updated ports tree Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:23:37 -0400 On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:04:06PM +, Killermink ! wrote: Hello all, I

Re: updated ports tree

2004-04-23 Thread Chuck Swiger
Killermink ! wrote: I see what your saying and i suppose I have two points: 1) Can you install a port without installing the ports tree? Yes, or sort of. You need things like the ports Makefiles in /usr/ports/Mk, but if you copy, say, archivers/gtar to /tmp/gtar and then deleted

Re: updated ports tree

2004-04-23 Thread Danny MacMillan
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 23:41:36 +, Killermink ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see what your saying and i suppose I have two points: 1) Can you install a port without installing the ports tree? Ports can not be installed without first being built, and the ports tree is what enables you to build a

Re: updated ports tree

2004-04-23 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 07:38:37PM -0600, Danny MacMillan wrote: On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 23:41:36 +, Killermink ! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see what your saying and i suppose I have two points: 1) Can you install a port without installing the ports tree? Ports can not be installed

Re: updated ports tree

2004-04-23 Thread Joe Altman
, Killermink; let me know if I've made things clearer or foggier, please. Original Message Follows From: Joe Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killermink! [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: updated ports tree Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:23:37 -0400