At 08:18 PM 4/9/01 -0700, Yann Sommer wrote:
Heya all,
I've been following this thread with some extra attention, since I remember
beeing new to FreeBSD and complaining about a dedicated Server I ordered,
running BETA. It is just, as has been mentioned a few times before on this
list, against
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
in machine was installed:
fxp0, fxp1, fxp2, xl0, ep0.
(ep0 record included in kernel file)
After cvsup/make world/make-install kernel/reboot
( FreeBSD 4.3-RC #0: Tue Apr 10 01:02:55 MSD 2001 )
ep1 was appeared instead ep0.
I hope, in 4.3-R|ELEASE this bug was
Hi all,
Last night I tried to upgrade to 4.3RC2 but have had problems. Here's what
I did. Sorry for the brief info but I am not at my machine. Any insight
would be appreciated.
I cvsup'd to latest. Which was only about 4 files as I have been keeping
track but not installed since March 20th
Hello !!
I have problems with high load on FBSD box. First I had the 4.2 STABLE ,
then I cvsuped to 4.3-RC. Same thing.
When high traffic occurs on 100mbit hub, to wich is fxp0 connected, load
and processor usage on natd process is very high and after a while it
won't pass packets anymore to
Hello !!
I have problems with high load on FBSD box. First I had the 4.2 STABLE ,
then I cvsuped to 4.3-RC. Same thing.
When high traffic occurs on 100mbit hub, to wich is fxp0 connected, load
and processor usage on natd process is very high and after a while it
won't pass packets anymore to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Greg Lehey writes:
# disklabel -r -w da0s1 auto
/kernel: da0: cannot find label (no disk label)
/kernel: da0: cannot find label (no disk label)
/kernel: da0s1: cannot find label (no disk label)
/kernel: da0s1: cannot find label (no disk label)
/kernel:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 03:54:32PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
Next, the case of the bind and ntpd updates. Yes, these were fixed
in -STABLE and -CURRENT very quickly, but were only documented in UPDATING.
How many people who are running -RELEASE have this? That's right, none. If
the
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 05:29:43AM +1200, Dan Langille wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Christopher Schulte wrote:
At 03:45 AM 4/10/2001 +1200, Dan Langille wrote:
Give meaningful and widely used names to things which people are familiar
with.
-CURRENT fits all those requirements.
In this
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 05:55:13PM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
Jordan Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] types:
Just because the problem is difficult to solve does not mean it can not be
or should not be solved.
Fine, how about you solve it and the rest of us will get back to all
the other stuff
On 10-Apr-2001 Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
At 07:45 PM 4/9/01 -0500, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
On 09-Apr-2001 Miha Nedok wrote:
I really wish it'd be possible to just make selective portions
of the source tree, is that possible?
You might look at /etc/defaults/make.conf
What you're
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 01:38:15PM -0400, Michael R. Rudel wrote:
x.x-BETA is ... notoriously buggy. It has bugs, that's the point of the
x.y-GAMMA rather than x.y-BETA might would be a good move. Then we'd
have 1/2 the world asking what "GAMMA" means. We could then hit over the
head them
FreeBSD Admin wrote:
Can someone point me to a clear step-by-step explanation of how to do
this? I have cvsup'd the stable sources and the ports, but now what?
1. Set KERNCONF=FOO in /etc/make.conf, where FOO is the name of your kernel.
2. cvsup, you say you've done that bit.
3. # cd
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:16:45PM -0700, Christian Chen wrote:
But why is "something" breaking ? The build process should be clean. If
not, something is messed in your source code repository.
Well, I know that when I installed 4.2-RELEASE off of CD, make world
in /usr/src did not work.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 05:36:20PM -0400, FreeBSD Admin wrote:
Please bear with me. I have tried to understand this process, but still it
is not clear to me. I have read
http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/current-stable.html
http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/synching.html
Kind regards and grateful appreciateion to those who responded. I thyink I
get it now. Thanks again. - Ralph
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
:I have a dual-homed machine doing routing and firewalling on which hundreds
:of the following messages appear in my logs every 10 minutes or so:
:
: /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 44069/200 pps
: /kernel: arp: runt packet
: last message repeated 14691 times
:
:At the same time these
subscribe freebsd-stable
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Hello all,
You'll have to excuse me, I'm quite the new user. I sychronized my source
with the stable branch using cvsup. Everything went ok with buildworld but
now installworld is giving me errors. I get something along the lines of:
ln: /usr/share/man/man3/mvaddnstr.3.gz
no such file
rm -f
:: Seems to me that if the lowest-common-denominator had some way to
:: stay stable that didn't involve using cvsup or a compiler, this would
:: be a non-issue.
::
:: Numbered binary patches, anyone?
Troll!
;-)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable"
problem fixed. I misread the handbook and thought I could use the -j during
make for the installworld. I got rid of it and all was well.
thanks
Gregg
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 12:07:34PM +0200, Marko Cuk wrote:
I have also 84 ipfw rules for firewall ( most of them reset and deny and
a few dummynet pipes ).
Is the processor too slow for that ?
Depending on the order of these rules: possibly.
--
Bill Fumerola - security yahoo /
"Bruce A. Mah" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems that they've been moved, the new ata(4) explains how to set them
(ie from the loader)
And it's also mentioned in RELNOTES.TXT:
# To provide more flexible configuration, the various options for the
# ata(4) driver are now boot loader
Since, noone supplied a patch that will help users to find the
information when the tag changes from -STABLE/-CURRENT to -BETA
or -RC. I created a patch to newvers.sh that will display an
informitive message.
This patch changes the version string to include a message
that can be used to inform
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010410 17:11]
wrote:
Since, noone supplied a patch that will help users to find the
information when the tag changes from -STABLE/-CURRENT to -BETA
or -RC. I created a patch to newvers.sh that will display an
informitive message.
This patch changes
24 matches
Mail list logo
