Hmm, I just went through all of the mlx related files and none of them
changed between 4.2-RELEASE and 4.3-RELEASE. So it looks like there is
something more sinister going on.
-gordon
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Matt Groener wrote:
I have been trying to get anyone to respond to this issue as well.
I
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:55:14PM +0100, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
Hi Guilherme,
OK. But I'd like to know if I should use CFLAGS in a OS like FreeBSD. I
know that I have good optimizations on Linux, but I don't know if
in FreeBSD is the same, and I'm afraid of putting the FreeBSD stability in
Hmm, I just went through all of the mlx related files and none of them
changed between 4.2-RELEASE and 4.3-RELEASE. So it looks like there is
something more sinister going on.
This is a known problem. I don't know what's up, and I can't reproduce
it (as I don't have any of these cards). I
:: The risk is the same in Linux; they both use gcc, and it's gcc which
:: has the optimizer bugs. It's more common to use absurd gcc
:: optimizations in the Linux community for some reason (perhaps they're
:: used to code misbehaving, so additional brokenness from the gcc
:: doesn't add much
:: The risk is the same in Linux; they both use gcc, and it's gcc which
:: has the optimizer bugs. It's more common to use absurd gcc
:: optimizations in the Linux community for some reason (perhaps they're
:: used to code misbehaving, so additional brokenness from the gcc
:: doesn't add
:: It would be more accurate to say that Linux and FreeBSD have a compiler
:: with optimiser bugs, but that's widely known. Don't sound so
:: surprised. 8)
Heh, no, I'm not surprised, but I think the truth is probably inbetween...
maybe the code fed to the compiler isn't always as perfect as it
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Mike Smith wrote:
This is a known problem. I don't know what's up, and I can't reproduce
it (as I don't have any of these cards). I suspect that it may be an
issue with non-page-aligned I/O and the very limited scatter-gather that
these cards support.
On Mon, 7 May
:: Perhaps you'd be more comfortable if we changed the documentation to
:: remove all references to any -O switch with a number attached?
Dunno. In my experience, any -O switch with a number attached creates
problems when compiling the kernel/userland on FreeBSD, so it seems
pointless to have
Redirected to Questions...
*snip*
1) Why are the same rules used twice?
*snip*
To catch packets both before and after NAT translation. The NAT
rule in between them changes the source or destination of some packets
that pass through it. So we check it twice.
2) What does this
I don't know why the optflags produce broken code on FreeBSD, but not with
Linux.
I don't know how you managed to reach THAT conclusion. :)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:23:07AM +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote:
Aren't we sick of this thread yet?
Yes. Perhaps you could take the lesson for the next time someone asks
you to please read the archives instead of dragging out the same tired
thread all over again.
Kris
PGP signature
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:23:07AM +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote:
:: Perhaps you'd be more comfortable if we changed the documentation to
:: remove all references to any -O switch with a number attached?
Dunno. In my experience, any -O switch with a number attached creates
problems when
:: Yes. Perhaps you could take the lesson for the next time someone asks
:: you to please read the archives instead of dragging out the same tired
:: thread all over again.
Nobody said that. I trust you will chastise all the other participants in
this thread for having the temerity to drag out
Erik Trulsson wrote:
I have had both userland and kernel compiled using -O2 without noticing
any problems. On the other hand I didn't notice much of a performance
gain either so I decided that the extra compile time wasn't worth it.
Translation: don't even think about using optimization
Is there any way that Oracle will work on FreeBSD? I have version
4.2 Stable FreeBSD and would like to install a reliable and stable
database package for personal and production usage.
Thank you,
John
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:23:07AM +1200, Juha Saarinen wrote:
I don't know why the optflags produce broken code on FreeBSD, but not with
Linux.
Actually, -O 2 does produce broken code in Linux. The reason -O2 is
used more often on a Linux system is because you never recompile the
entire
ok, this has got me confused :
# finger user
Login: userName: user
Directory: /home/userShell: /bin/tcsh
Last login Tue May 8 12:17 (EDT) on ttyp0 from invalid hostname
No Mail.
what the hell is invalid hostname?
so I checked the source code :
(from lib/libutil/logwtmp.c. similar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] types:
Is there any way that Oracle will work on FreeBSD? I have version
4.2 Stable FreeBSD and would like to install a reliable and stable
database package for personal and production usage.
This is asked - and answered - on -questions every few months. Check
the
Greetings,
I have gotten the linux version of Oracle 8 to work on FreeBSD before (about
1 year ago).
If you will kindly search the FreeBSD mail archive, you should be able to
find my previous post.
Also, go a search on Deja news, (groups.google), there are some how-tos
out there
19 matches
Mail list logo
