vmstat regression (RELENG_4 - RELENG_5)

2004-11-17 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! While playing with fresh installation of 5.3-RELEASE (GENERIC kernel) I've noticed that I can only see my HDD in the left lower corner of the systat's vmstat screen. I also have working floppy and CD-RW drives, both are detected and work, but I can't see data transfer stats for them. In

Performance issues in 5.3-RELEASE.

2004-11-17 Thread Krzysztof Kowalik
Hello, Recently I took some time to upgrade my home 4.9 system to 5.3-RELEASE (fortunately, taking full system dump before, so I can easily get back). In fact just after upgrading I ran into the weird issue during installation for firefox port. When firefox-1.0-source.tar.bz2 is getting

5.3-STABLE frozen on heavy network load

2004-11-17 Thread Lukas Ertl
Hi, I'm seeing complete freezes on a 5.3-STABLE SMP (with HTT) kernel from Fri Nov 12. The machine is acting as a newsserver, thus it has heavy network and disk load. With the help of MP_WATCHDOG I was able to get a backtrace: Watchdog timer: 2 Watchdog timer: 1 Watchdog timer: 0 Watchdog

pam-pgsql

2004-11-17 Thread Anton Nikiforov
Dear All I was trying to find updates for pam-pgsql port to compile it under 5.3, but was not succseeded. Could you please give me the direction where to search for updated sources or alternative? I need to run SASL2 and authenticate users recorded in PGSql. I was trying to fix and compile the

Re: 5.3-STABLE frozen on heavy network load

2004-11-17 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Lukas Ertl wrote: I'm seeing complete freezes on a 5.3-STABLE SMP (with HTT) kernel from Fri Nov 12. The machine is acting as a newsserver, thus it has heavy network and disk load. Do you know if the freeze happens with 5.3-RELEASE as released? If you set

flash and libmap.conf?

2004-11-17 Thread Ben Paley
Hello, I went from 4-Stable, where I had flash working fine, to 5-Current where it worked a bit sometimes, to 5-Stable where it only works in Konqueror. Mozilla gives me this: bash-2.05b$ mozilla Error: No running window found. LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library

Re: 5.3-STABLE frozen on heavy network load

2004-11-17 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:22:14 + (GMT), Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Lukas Ertl wrote: I'm seeing complete freezes on a 5.3-STABLE SMP (with HTT) kernel from Fri Nov 12. The machine is acting as a newsserver, thus it has heavy network and disk load.

fast data access mmu miss with 5.3-STABLE from today

2004-11-17 Thread Herve Boulouis
Hello, just cvsuped my 5.3-STABLE 3 hours ago (dual ultra sparc with SMP) and got the following panic : db panic() at panic+0x168 trap() at trap+0x3ac -- fast data access mmu miss tar=0 %o7=0xc02ba340 -- m_copym() at m_copym+0x2c tcp_output() at tcp_output+0xeec tcp_input() at tcp_input+0x2484

Re: vmstat regression (RELENG_4 - RELENG_5)

2004-11-17 Thread Paul Mather
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 09:51 +0200, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: Hello! While playing with fresh installation of 5.3-RELEASE (GENERIC kernel) I've noticed that I can only see my HDD in the left lower corner of the systat's vmstat screen. I also have working floppy and CD-RW drives, both are

SiI0680 ATA RAID question

2004-11-17 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! In 5.3-RELEASE ERRATA I see the following: (1 Nov 2004) ATA RAID support for the CMD649 and SiI0680 ATA controllers is non-functional in this release. When such a controller is brough up under ata(4) (ataraid) on 5.3, the RAID configuration stored under 5.2 or prior may be

Re: Performance issues in 5.3-RELEASE.

2004-11-17 Thread Paul Boehmer
Hello, Recently I took some time to upgrade my home 4.9 system to 5.3-RELEASE (fortunately, taking full system dump before, so I can easily get back). In fact just after upgrading I ran into the weird issue during installation for firefox port. When firefox-1.0-source.tar.bz2 is getting

Snapshot corruption.

2004-11-17 Thread David Gilbert
I've got a medium busy server (few thousand mail messages a day, web, webmail, imap, etc) that I can fairly reliably reproduce filesystem corruption by creating multiple snapshots and deleting them. I don't think I'm up to debugging this, but I may be able to provide an exercise platform. Dave.

Re: Snapshot corruption.

2004-11-17 Thread Julian Elischer
David Gilbert wrote: I've got a medium busy server (few thousand mail messages a day, web, webmail, imap, etc) that I can fairly reliably reproduce filesystem corruption by creating multiple snapshots and deleting them. I don't think I'm up to debugging this, but I may be able to provide an

Re: Snapshot corruption.

2004-11-17 Thread David Gilbert
Julian == Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Julian David Gilbert wrote: I've got a medium busy server (few thousand mail messages a day, web, webmail, imap, etc) that I can fairly reliably reproduce filesystem corruption by creating multiple snapshots and deleting them. I don't

Re: fast data access mmu miss with 5.3-STABLE from today

2004-11-17 Thread Herve Boulouis
Le 17/11/2004 à 14:34, Herve Boulouis a écrit: Hello, just cvsuped my 5.3-STABLE 3 hours ago (dual ultra sparc with SMP) and got the following panic : Same thing 1 hour after the rebooting the machine : db trace panic() at panic+0x168 trap() at trap+0x3ac -- fast data access mmu miss

portupgrade crash on 4.9-stable

2004-11-17 Thread Brian Szymanski
Hi, I'm having a problem with portupgrade on 4.9: # portupgrade -f sudo\* Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait.. Done. done [Updating the portsdb format:bdb1_btree in /usr/ports ... - 11962 port entries found

Re: portupgrade crash on 4.9-stable

2004-11-17 Thread Ricardo Oliva
Hi Brian, Just add: ENV['PORTS_DBDRIVER'] = 'bdb1_hash' to your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf. Ran into that yesterday and came across a page on the web that helped me. Good luck. Cheers -- Ricardo Oliva Core Systems Administrator Zoology Department University of British Columbia Ph.:

atapicam Promise [maybe PR/73675]

2004-11-17 Thread Peter Wullinger
Hello, This is a strange, but non-critical one, and since I have no idea, where to start, I should probably pass this on to folks who have better knowledge of the code and hardware concerned: The normal (disfunctional) configuration is: atapci0 M \- ad0 S \- ad1 atapci1 (Via) M

Problem with buildworld

2004-11-17 Thread Wout Steentjes
Hello, I've a problem with buildworld after cvsup (upgrading from 5.2.1 to 5.3): - Building an up-to-date make(1) -- cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.bin/make -DMAKE_VERSION=\5200408120\ -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELL=1 -static -o make

serious networking (em) performance (ggate and NFS) problem

2004-11-17 Thread Emanuel Strobl
Dear best guys, I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer rates, after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet Cards to solve my performance problem (*laugh*): (In short, see *** below) Tests were done with two Intel GigaBit Ethernet cards (82547EI,

Re: atapicam Promise [maybe PR/73675]

2004-11-17 Thread Thomas Quinot
* Peter Wullinger, 2004-11-17 : additional debugging information (if somebody tells me how to get some), test patches and the usual stuff, if anybody feels inclined to fix the problem. Complete output from a verbose boot (boot -v at the loader prompt) would be useful. == dmesg == atapci0:

Re: portupgrade crash on 4.9-stable

2004-11-17 Thread Ronald Klop
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 16:21:18 -0500 (EST), Brian Szymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm having a problem with portupgrade on 4.9: # portupgrade -f sudo\* Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait.. Done. done [Updating the portsdb format:bdb1_btree in /usr/ports ... -

Re: portupgrade crash on 4.9-stable

2004-11-17 Thread Doug White
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Ricardo Oliva wrote: Hi Brian, Just add: ENV['PORTS_DBDRIVER'] = 'bdb1_hash' to your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf. Ran into that yesterday and came across a page on the web that helped me. This probably causes the db files to get regenerated -- the segfault comes

Re: serious networking (em) performance (ggate and NFS) problem

2004-11-17 Thread Sean McNeil
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 23:57 +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote: Dear best guys, I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer rates, after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet Cards to solve my performance problem (*laugh*): (In short, see *** below)

Re: portupgrade crash on 4.9-stable

2004-11-17 Thread Ricardo Oliva
portsdb -Uu is the command. You have a few files involved: /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db /usr/ports/INDEX /usr/ports/INDEX.db Don't really know which is which. Cheers -- Ricardo Oliva Core Systems Administrator Zoology Department University of British Columbia Ph.: 604-822-3882 E-mail: [EMAIL

Re: serious networking (em) performance (ggate and NFS) problem

2004-11-17 Thread Emanuel Strobl
Am Donnerstag, 18. November 2004 00:17 schrieb Sean McNeil: On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 23:57 +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote: Dear best guys, I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer rates, after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet Cards to solve

Re: serious networking (em) performance (ggate and NFS) problem

2004-11-17 Thread Scott Long
Emanuel Strobl wrote: Dear best guys, I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer rates, after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet Cards to solve my performance problem (*laugh*): (In short, see *** below) Tests were done with two Intel GigaBit

Re: serious networking (em) performance (ggate and NFS) problem

2004-11-17 Thread Emanuel Strobl
Am Donnerstag, 18. November 2004 00:33 schrieb Scott Long: Emanuel Strobl wrote: Dear best guys, I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer rates, after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet Cards to solve my performance problem (*laugh*):

Re: Performance issues in 5.3-RELEASE.

2004-11-17 Thread Anish Mistry
On Wednesday 17 November 2004 04:40 am, Krzysztof Kowalik wrote: Hello, Recently I took some time to upgrade my home 4.9 system to 5.3-RELEASE (fortunately, taking full system dump before, so I can easily get back). In fact just after upgrading I ran into the weird issue during

Re: serious networking (em) performance (ggate and NFS) problem

2004-11-17 Thread Chuck Swiger
Emanuel Strobl wrote: [ ... ] Tests were done with two Intel GigaBit Ethernet cards (82547EI, 32bit PCI Desktop adapter MT) connected directly without a switch/hub If filesharing via NFS is your primary goal, it's reasonable to test that, however it would be easier to make sense of your results

Re: portupgrade crash on 4.9-stable

2004-11-17 Thread Michael Nottebrock
On Thursday, 18. November 2004 00:03, Ronald Klop wrote: But the real problem is the segfault with ruby, which can be reliably reproduced ad infinitum. About the ruby thing. Try deinstall/reinstall of ruby and portupgrade manually and try again. (This is my best guess.) Known problem - the

Re: serious networking (em) performance (ggate and NFS) problem

2004-11-17 Thread Wilkinson, Alex
ping only tests latency *not* throughput. So it is not really a good test. - aW 0n Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 07:01:24PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote: Emanuel Strobl wrote: [ ... ] Tests were done with two Intel GigaBit Ethernet cards (82547EI, 32bit PCI

Re: portupgrade crash on 4.9-stable

2004-11-17 Thread Brian Szymanski
Sweet, that did the trick. Thanks a bundle... Cheers, Brian Hi Brian, Just add: ENV['PORTS_DBDRIVER'] = 'bdb1_hash' to your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf. Ran into that yesterday and came across a page on the web that helped me. Good luck. Cheers -- Ricardo Oliva Core Systems

Re: serious networking (em) performance (ggate and NFS) problem

2004-11-17 Thread Emanuel Strobl
Am Donnerstag, 18. November 2004 01:01 schrieb Chuck Swiger: Emanuel Strobl wrote: [ ... ] Tests were done with two Intel GigaBit Ethernet cards (82547EI, 32bit PCI Desktop adapter MT) connected directly without a switch/hub If filesharing via NFS is your primary goal, it's reasonable to

Re: serious networking (em) performance (ggate and NFS) problem

2004-11-17 Thread Mike Jakubik
Emanuel Strobl said: ~ 15MB/s .and with 1m blocksize: test2:~#17: dd if=/dev/zero of=/samsung/testfile bs=1m ^C61+0 records in 60+0 records out 62914560 bytes transferred in 4.608726 secs (13651182 bytes/sec) -

RE: portupgrade crash on 4.9-stable

2004-11-17 Thread Mauricio Brunstein
Hi! I had the same problem months ago in 4.8. Is not related to the distribution, the problem is in portupgrade. Please update the ports tree, and then deinstall and reinstal portupgrade. This was the solution in my case. Regards, Mauricio. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Pam Authorization Problem

2004-11-17 Thread Doug White
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, jesk wrote: huh? as in a user that more or less does *not* exist on your system can log in? do you have any other authentication modules that the system falls to? Sure, authentication is enabled too, but i want to limit access through authorization. Be careful, I

Re: heavy named problems

2004-11-17 Thread Doug White
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Michael Riexinger wrote: i have freebsd 5.3-release with the base bind 9.3 (chrooted). It allows recursive queries. After few hours running, the server answers to every query with SERVFAIL. Few minutes before, in the logs is this: named: isc_mutex_init failed in

Re: sshd stops accepting connections

2004-11-17 Thread Doug White
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: Today I suddenly couldn't log in via ssh to a server I upgraded to FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE 4 days ago. When I tried connect to port 22 using telnet(1) the following just happend: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] telnet 192.168.3.2 22 Trying 192.168.3.2...

Re: sshd stops accepting connections

2004-11-17 Thread Doug White
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Zoltan Frombach wrote: Today I suddenly couldn't log in via ssh to a server I upgraded to FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE 4 days ago. When I tried connect to port 22 using telnet(1) the following just happend: [simon at zaphod:~] telnet 192.168.3.2 22 Trying 192.168.3.2...

Re: sshd stops accepting connections

2004-11-17 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 07:19:21PM -0800, Doug White wrote: This is the kicker -- sshd couldn't fork because somethnig went berzerk. Nov 11 13:49:54 www kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 212 to 200 packets/sec This looks a lot like a SYN flood on some daemon that fork()s

Can't build STABLE from 5.2.1

2004-11-17 Thread Lars Eighner
I cannot seem to build STABLE. This is the output of uname -a FreeBSD goodwill.io.com 5.2.1-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p3 #0: Mon Mar 29 00:37:36 CST 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Here is what happens when I try to buildworld. I have completely ripped out

Re: Performance issues in 5.3-RELEASE.

2004-11-17 Thread Eirik Øverby
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 10:40 +0100, Krzysztof Kowalik wrote: Hello, Recently I took some time to upgrade my home 4.9 system to 5.3-RELEASE (fortunately, taking full system dump before, so I can easily get back). In fact just after upgrading I ran into the weird issue during installation

Re: Can't build STABLE from 5.2.1

2004-11-17 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 12:26:15AM -0600, Lars Eighner wrote: I cannot seem to build STABLE. This is the output of uname -a FreeBSD goodwill.io.com 5.2.1-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p3 #0: Mon Mar 29 00:37:36 CST 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Here is

Re: Problem with buildworld

2004-11-17 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 12:00:35AM +0100, Wout Steentjes wrote: Hello, I've a problem with buildworld after cvsup (upgrading from 5.2.1 to 5.3): - Building an up-to-date make(1) -- cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.bin/make