Hi,
I want to use the RAID1 on this ASUS mobo. I've configured it as RAID1
in the bios, but BSD53 just sees two discs and not a RAID1 array. (ad4
and ad6). The drives are two identical Maxtor 80Gb SATA discs.
Any special things I need to do?
NIels
Piersma.COM is een handelsnaam van Piersma
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 20:16, Jorn Argelo wrote:
Other then that, I am not sure if FreeBSD 5.3 is going to support your RAID
controller. Mine was never fully detected neither by BSD nor Linux (I have
an ASUS K8V SE Deluxe). If you array is not detected, then the odds are
relatively high that you
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 10:46:53AM +0100, Jorn Argelo wrote..
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 09:50:05 +0100, Niels Piersma wrote
Hi,
I want to use the RAID1 on this ASUS mobo. I've configured it as
RAID1 in the bios, but BSD53 just sees two discs and not a RAID1
array. (ad4 and ad6). The drives
Hi Niels!
If that's not working (I don't know anything about ICH5) you may use
atacontrol to create a RAID1.
I've set this up on two Dell PE 750 machines with each having two 80 GB
SATA disks and it's working perfect.
Greetings,
Volker
Hi,
I want to use the RAID1 on this ASUS mobo. I've
Hi Jeremie and Lists,
Great work Shunsuke, thank you !
Any chance to get this patch reviewed and commited ?
Thank you.
I did send-pr as kern/74986.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=74986
I think that the appropriate value of interrupt moderation depends on
each system, but
TB --- 2004-12-12 12:59:12 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2004-12-12 12:59:12 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2004-12-12 12:59:12 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2004-12-12 12:59:12 - cd /tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386
TB --- 2004-12-12
- Original Message -
From: Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Niels Piersma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: Asus P4P800 SE RAID1 on Intel ICH5 not working
Hi Niels!
If that's not working (I don't know anything about ICH5) you
I can't seem to get remote access anymore but at the site everything seems to
work?? I run a webserver and all the sites run fine but all of a sudden no more
access through putty, or ftp. The only thing that is diff is I enabled ipfw but
only open. It was always slow to get in using putty but now
The attached patch of login(1) allows hushlogin and nocheckmail attributes
to work from the user's '.login_conf' as well as from the '/etc/login.conf'.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 02:21:23PM -0800, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
The attached patch of login(1) allows hushlogin and nocheckmail attributes
to work from the user's '.login_conf' as well as from the '/etc/login.conf'.
It would be a good idea to send-pr this.
Ceri
--
Only two things are
--- Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 02:21:23PM -0800, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
The attached patch of login(1) allows hushlogin and nocheckmail
attributes to work from the user's '.login_conf' as well as from the
'/etc/login.conf'.
It would be a good idea to
TB --- 2004-12-13 00:29:26 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2004-12-13 00:29:26 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2004-12-13 00:29:26 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2004-12-13 00:29:26 - cd /tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386
TB --- 2004-12-13
And another, I can now confirm that it is fairly easy to kill 5.3-release
during the rebuilding process. The following steps will cause a kernel
page fault consistently:
atacontrol create RAID0 ad6 ad10
atacontrol detach 5
log: ad10 deleted from ar0 disk1
log: ad10 WARNING -
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Aaron Stephanic wrote:
I've had a server freeze three times on me know and I have no idea what
the problem is... of course nothing gets output to the logs. The first
time it was at 3AM on a Sunday so I thought the problem must be one of
the periodic scripts. But those
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Joe Rhett wrote:
And another, I can now confirm that it is fairly easy to kill 5.3-release
during the rebuilding process. The following steps will cause a kernel
page fault consistently:
atacontrol create RAID0 ad6 ad10
atacontrol detach 5
log: ad10 deleted from
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, J. Martin Petersen wrote:
We are trying to gather some debug information for a problem that is difficult
to diagnose, as the machine always ends up hard frozen (does not do anything,
can not break to debugger, does not respond to keyboard, etc.), so we are
dumping output
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 09:50:05 +0100, Niels Piersma wrote
Hi,
I want to use the RAID1 on this ASUS mobo. I've configured it as
RAID1 in the bios, but BSD53 just sees two discs and not a RAID1
array. (ad4 and ad6). The drives are two identical Maxtor 80Gb SATA discs.
Are you sure that you
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 02:52:46PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't seem to get remote access anymore but at the site everything seems to
work?? I run a webserver and all the sites run fine but all of a sudden no
more
access through putty, or ftp. The only thing that is diff is I
Hello,
I found your website in the google search engine and I see you link several
sites similar to ours and I was wondering if you'd be interested in a link
exchange with our site http://www.8thd.net/ , We have a Google Rank PR of 5
which is pretty good and have quite a steady flow of
Soren, I have a quick question. Am I misreading this, or is it misleading?
During testing of a sil3114 controller (sorry, I know you hate this)
I pulled out drive 4, which was part of a mirror:
sandbox# atacontrol list
ATA channel 0:
Master: no device present
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
I'm getting reports from a user who can't build a port on 4.10,
because his system has a sys/bitypes.h header which contains
definitions that collide with sys/inttypes.h and sys/types.h.
As far as I can tell, there is no sys/bitypes.h in 4.10.
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Dec 10, 2004, at 9:18 PM, Bruce Burden wrote:
I build a 5.3 kernel and source from source. When I booted, I got:
Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993,
1994
And here's where I found even more interesting stuff. (again with the
sil3114 controller)
If you detach a channel and then attach the channel, a new raid device gets
created. And the removed drive shows up in the new array...
# atacontrol create RAID0 ad6 ad8
# atacontrol
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Joe Rhett wrote:
And another, I can now confirm that it is fairly easy to kill 5.3-release
during the rebuilding process. The following steps will cause a kernel
page fault consistently:
atacontrol create RAID0 ad6 ad10
atacontrol detach 5
log: ad10 deleted
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Michael Schuh wrote:
I hav Host A andHost B both are connected to an SAN
through an QLA2200 Fibre-Channel (man isp).
On the SAN are 14 Disks da0-da13 these Disks are configured
w/ vinum to an RAID 10 Filesystem.
Now i have the Problem i would make Host A to an PDC
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 09:55:34PM -0800, Doug White wrote:
That message is indicative of the acpi module being built with debugging
but the kernel not being built with 'options DDB'. It implies the world
and kernel are out of sync. Bruce, how are you building your kernel?
Hi Doug,
i have a couple users on my box and they was haveing the same issues and
what it wound up being is that they was useing an older ver of putty.. i had
them d/l the new ver and all was fine .. no more time outs
ner ver of putty is 0.56
hope this helps you , it helped out my users after upgrade to
27 matches
Mail list logo
