Hi folks,
With a source of 5minutes ago I get this:
cat curses.head curses.h.new
AWK=awk _POSIX2_VERSION=199209 sh
/usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/include/MKkey_defs.sh
/usr/src/lib/libncurses/../../contrib/ncurses/include/Caps curses.h.new
cat
Hello.
I've been struggling with a dual boot setup for the best part of two
days here, and I'm not going to go outline the hazzles I've been
through. This is where I am now:
ad0 = Windows XP Professional
ad1 = FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE
Both OSs were installed from scratch, and ad0 and ad1 are set to
Mark Kirkwood said:
fredrik engberg wrote:
Hey.
I'm having some trouble getting my promise fasttrak tx4200 (PDC20619)
to work on FreeBSD 5.3. It wont show up on dmesg or when i use
atacontrol list. when i use pciconf -lv it give me this.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:8:0: class=0x010400 card=0x3519105a
What about fdisk?
Is the 4.x one dangerously dedicated?
I have a lot of data on the ad1 hdd from webpages i was hosting .. admittedly
i got most backed up .. but there was a lot of other important data i cant
re-retrieve without severe cost to myself which id rather very much not have
to do.
I didn't suggest you trash it I just want to know if it was setup as
dangerously dedicated, and what the output of the fdisk command on both
drives is..
Soz mis understood..
*** Working on device /dev/ad0 ***
parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are:
cylinders=232581 heads=16
Dear list, dear Pawel,
I think it's a big error that ordinary users can issue a 'gmirror
stop /dev/mirrir/sample' with success!
Thanks,
-Harry
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
On 2005.01.08 15:32:22 +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
Dear list, dear Pawel,
I think it's a big error that ordinary users can issue a 'gmirror
stop /dev/mirrir/sample' with success!
Are you sure about that? I can't do it on my test system:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] gmirror stop /dev/mirror/sys0
Dear all,
my machine hard locks with the attached ruleset.
If I set debug.mpsafenet to 0 everything is fine. This was a wild guess from
me, I could nowhere find the info that PF needs this tweaking and I think
it's not intended, otherwise it would be done in rc.conf e.g.
I read about user
Building stable I have this problem
=== lib/libc
cc -pg -O -pipe -I/usr/src/lib/libc/include
-I/usr/src/lib/libc/../../include -I/usr/src/lib/libc/i386
-D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -I/usr/src/lib/libc/../../contrib/gdtoa -DINET6
-I/usr/obj/usr/src/lib/libc -DPOSIX_MISTAKE
Am Samstag, 8. Januar 2005 15:41 schrieb Simon L. Nielsen:
I think it's a big error that ordinary users can issue a 'gmirror
stop /dev/mirrir/sample' with success!
Are you sure about that? I can't do it on my test system:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] gmirror stop /dev/mirror/sys0
Permission
I did some in the comp.unix.bsd.freebsd news group, and I found some
people with the same problem. I'm suspecting that it is impossible to
boot FreeBSD by using NTLDR to load the FreeBSD boot sector from a
file when FreeBSD is placed on a second disk.
Can anyone confirm that this is the case?
On 2005.01.08 15:49:16 +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
Am Samstag, 8. Januar 2005 15:41 schrieb Simon L. Nielsen:
I think it's a big error that ordinary users can issue a 'gmirror
stop /dev/mirrir/sample' with success!
Are you sure about that? I can't do it on my test system:
[EMAIL
Aron Stansvik wrote:
I did some in the comp.unix.bsd.freebsd news group, and I found some
people with the same problem. I'm suspecting that it is impossible to
boot FreeBSD by using NTLDR to load the FreeBSD boot sector from a
file when FreeBSD is placed on a second disk.
Can anyone confirm that
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 07:49:10AM -0700, RJ45 wrote:
Building stable I have this problem
/usr/src/lib/libc/gen/syslog.c:336: error: `_PATH_LOG_PRIV' undeclared
I guess that you are building RELENG_5, rather than RELENG_4? The
error suggests that either /usr/src/sys/sys/syslog.h is out of
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
my machine hard locks with the attached ruleset. If I set
debug.mpsafenet to 0 everything is fine. This was a wild guess from me,
I could nowhere find the info that PF needs this tweaking and I think
it's not intended, otherwise it would be
On Saturday 08 January 2005 17:52, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
my machine hard locks with the attached ruleset. If I set
debug.mpsafenet to 0 everything is fine. This was a wild guess from me,
I could nowhere find the info that PF needs this tweaking
Aron Stansvik skrev:
I did some in the comp.unix.bsd.freebsd news group, and I found some
people with the same problem. I'm suspecting that it is impossible to
boot FreeBSD by using NTLDR to load the FreeBSD boot sector from a
file when FreeBSD is placed on a second disk.
Can anyone confirm that
Am Samstag, 8. Januar 2005 18:24 schrieb Max Laier:
Yes, it is not intended. Please keep in mind that debug.mpsafenet cannot
be alterted at runtime, hence rc.conf would be too late anyway. Just
making that clear.
Right, but I meant that at least a note would pop up which tells me to modify
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 04:33:14PM +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
+ I'm not really sure it is expected that you can do that when being in
+ the operator group.
Yes. If you want to change it you should do:
# chmod 600 /dev/geom.ctl
--
Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On 2005.01.08 19:39:42 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 04:33:14PM +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
+ I'm not really sure it is expected that you can do that when being in
+ the operator group.
Yes. If you want to change it you should do:
# chmod 600
On Sat, 2005-Jan-08 16:58:10 +1000, Warren wrote:
I didn't suggest you trash it I just want to know if it was setup as
dangerously dedicated, and what the output of the fdisk command on both
drives is..
Soz mis understood..
Try running disklabel on ad0s1 and ad1s1. Slice numbers should now
On Sat, 2005-Jan-08 19:54:56 +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
On 2005.01.08 19:39:42 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 04:33:14PM +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
+ I'm not really sure it is expected that you can do that when being in
+ the operator group.
Yes. If you
M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brandon Fosdick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Judging from the man page, ucom is limited to acting like a tty with no
: support for sio. Is this true? Is there some magic config bit somewhere
: that will enable hidden sio support?
Ummm,
thanks I will try this out as soon as possible and report back.
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:38:54 -0500, Bosko Milekic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please try the attached patch. It's not exactly perfect but it might
solve your problem. Let me know.
-Bosko
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 02:12:33PM
I have a very bad problem. I need to seetup
large number of jails (about 100) to do virtual hosting
and i am doing it on 5.3-STABLE (not 5.3-RELEASE, i mean
-STABLE which is cvsupped). So, when i setup one jail -
everything runs fine for many days. If i setup one more jail
or 3 or more - server
On 8 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a very bad problem. I need to seetup large number of jails (about
100) to do virtual hosting and i am doing it on 5.3-STABLE (not
5.3-RELEASE, i mean -STABLE which is cvsupped). So, when i setup one
jail - everything runs fine for many days. If i
Dominic Marks wrote:
From a quick look in sys/ata and Google the PDC20619 seems to be the
TX4000 rather than the TX4200. Promise's website is, ... less than helpful
in finding these sorts of things out.
You are right (on both counts ...). The lack of detection now makes it
bit more sense,
On Jan 7, 2005, at 22:34, fredrik engberg wrote:
Hey.
I'm having some trouble getting my promise fasttrak tx4200 (PDC20619)
to work on FreeBSD 5.3. It wont show up on dmesg or when i use
atacontrol list. when i use pciconf -lv it give me this.
It's a PDC20571, and support is underway. It will
Hi,
I'm having trouble moving to FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE on my laptop. My
problems concern the behaviour of the laptop when suspend/resume is
used. Firstly I'd like to congratulate the FreeBSD team on this
release. It resolves several problems that I had with FreeBSD 4.x on
this hardware so the draw
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 06:08, Brandon Fosdick wrote:
If I use tip it works fine. But if I try to write a C program that opens
the device it hangs on open, unless I set it to non-blocking. Then open
returns and I set it back to blocking then try a read or a write. read()
blocks regardless of
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Is it blocking waiting for carrier detect to come up?
Try using the cuaNN device instead.
The software in question worked fine using a cuaNN device until said
device died.
Somebody else mentioned that I could set the device to ignore the
carrier detect signal. How do I do
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 12:42:25PM -0800, Scott Sewall wrote:
I'm running FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p3 that occasionally panics. The panic
occurs seems to happen when I'm running rsync of large directories
possibly in combination with reading or writing to a compact flash
attached to USB.
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:28, Brandon Fosdick wrote:
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Is it blocking waiting for carrier detect to come up?
Try using the cuaNN device instead.
The software in question worked fine using a cuaNN device until said
device died.
Somebody else mentioned that I could set the
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
ie setting CLOCAL.
That fixed it, thanks.
Is it worthwhile to change the ucom man page to not imply that it only
works for tty? That led me astray. I think I would have eventually found
CLOCAL if I hadn't stopped looking. Or am I the only one that finds it
misleading?
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Jeremy wri
tes:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 12:42:25PM -0800, Scott Sewall wrote:
I'm running FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p3 that occasionally panics. The panic
occurs seems to happen when I'm running rsync of large directories
possibly in combination with reading
I am helping a friend work out problems with the latest release of
streamripper. I run 5.3, he runs 4.10. The issue we currently have
concerns iswcntrl, or rather the lack of iswcntrl in 4.10. Has thought
been given to any sort of MFC to 4.11 or is his only recourse upgrading
to 5.3?
/Joe
The topic says all. I'd like to increase the size of the last GPT id (and
there's space after the last sector of the last ID).
Is it safe to delete it and create a new one with a bigger size?
Thanks,
-Harry
pgphD0rfLb0i0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Jan 8, 2005, at 7:54 PM, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
The topic says all. I'd like to increase the size of the last GPT id
(and
there's space after the last sector of the last ID).
Is it safe to delete it and create a new one with a bigger size?
The gpt(8) utility does not destroy the partition
If so I'd like to hear success/failure reports..
looking at closing or otherwise acting on:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/39341
however the original submitter has dissappeared.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
39 matches
Mail list logo
