On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 10:06:50PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Hi,
Has this patch beeen applied to CURRENT? So it will be in the next
release of FreeBSD?
Yes, about two weeks ago.
- Christian
--
Christian Brueffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key:
[quote=FreeBSD-SA-05:09.htt.asc]
NOTE: For users that are certain that their environment is not affected
by this vulnerability, such as single-user systems, Hyper-Threading
Technology may be re-enabled by setting the tunable
machdep.hyperthreading_allowed.
[/quote]
- Original Message -
Yo list!
I've found out that there are some hurdles in doing this upgrade, as
also pointed out by another user [0]. The problem is in make and I
think it happened during this change [1]. It can be solved by
installing the new make first, before the installkernel and
installworld process, e.g.:
[ resent, as I forgot to add the subject, sorry ]
I've found out that there are some hurdles in doing this upgrade, as
also pointed out by another user [0]. The problem is in make and I
think it happened during this change [1]. It can be solved by
installing the new make first, before the
On 2005-06-13 22:06, Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/vesa/patchset-highres.20050522
Has this patch beeen applied to CURRENT? So it will be in the next
release of FreeBSD?
Yes.
___
It's not related to more-than-full fs: it occured one more time without
it :(
Do someone have an idea ?
Geoffroy Desvernay a écrit :
This server (FreeBSD 5.4 RELENG) is crashing once a week or more since
5.4 (maybe before).
It may be related with a full filesystem:
I'm using snapshots on
On Jun 13, 2005, at 11:01 AM, Philippe PEGON wrote:
I contacted the author of the PR and he said he has the same
problem on two servers which seems to work fine with Linux : a HP
Proliant ML110 and an IBM. The only workaround he found is to
disable SMP and HTT. For information our server
On 13. jun. 2005, at 10.29, Marko uk wrote:
I have same hardware as before, when 5.3 was installed, except the
installation is new, 5.4. I have NFS mounted and some FTP app is
using it extensively and server crashes once / day.
How much memory do you have on the server? You may want to
I'm certain this is documented somewhere, but danged if I can find it.
I have a whole variety of custom scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d. For
years now, simply giving them a name ending in .sh and making them
executable has been sufficient to make them start on boot.
On 5.x, it's not. And now,
For scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d You should add an entry to /etc/rc.conf.
For example, if You script is somedaemon.sh, then add
somedaemon_enable='YES' to /etc/rc.conf and it will run at the next boot.
Cheers,
Gábor Kövesdán
Michael W. Lucas wrote:
I'm certain this is documented
You have to in rc.conf variable to run application as was for ssh and
others in this way:
if you want to run samba and dhcpd you have to put into rc.conf this:
samba_enable=YES
dhcpd_enable=YES
Il giorno mar, 14/06/2005 alle 11.02 -0400, Michael W. Lucas ha scritto:
I'm certain this is
That works fine for ports, but what about truly local custom scripts?
For example, I have a server with about 400 separate MRTG daemons on
it. (Yes, they must be separate, for administrative rather than
technical reasons.) Each daemon has a custom script. These aren't
ports, and they have no
On Jun 14, 2005, at 11:10 AM, Kövesdán Gábor wrote:
For scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d You should add an entry to /etc/
rc.conf.
For example, if You script is somedaemon.sh, then add
somedaemon_enable='YES' to /etc/rc.conf and it will run at the next
boot.
but his scripts don't use
Put them all in the same directory and write a quick script to loop through
the dir (make sure the directory's secure...). Then you could just add that
script to /etc/rc.conf?
peter
- Original Message -
From: Michael W. Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: K?vesd?n G?bor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
I'm certain this is documented somewhere, but danged if I can find it.
I have a whole variety of custom scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d. For
years now, simply giving them a name ending in .sh and making them
executable has been sufficient to make
On Jun 14, 2005, at 11:19 AM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
For example, I have a server with about 400 separate MRTG daemons on
it. (Yes, they must be separate, for administrative rather than
technical reasons.) Each daemon has a custom script. These aren't
ports, and they have no rcNG
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:22:07AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jun 14, 2005, at 11:10 AM, K?vesd?n G?bor wrote:
For scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d You should add an entry to /etc/
rc.conf.
For example, if You script is somedaemon.sh, then add
somedaemon_enable='YES' to /etc/rc.conf
On 6/14/05, Mars G. Miro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ resent, as I forgot to add the subject, sorry ]
I've found out that there are some hurdles in doing this upgrade, as
also pointed out by another user [0]. The problem is in make and I
think it happened during this change [1]. It can be
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 18:58, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:22:07AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jun 14, 2005, at 11:10 AM, K?vesd?n G?bor wrote:
For scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d You should add an entry to /etc/
rc.conf.
For example, if You script is somedaemon.sh,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for your answer.
I think that is not the problem. Here is my list of mounted filesystems:
/dev/ad0s2a on / (ufs, local)
devfs on /dev (devfs, local)
/dev/ad0s2e on /tmp (ufs, local, soft-updates)
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:58:36AM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:22:07AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jun 14, 2005, at 11:10 AM, K?vesd?n G?bor wrote:
For scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d You should add an entry to /etc/
rc.conf.
For example, if You script
I've been running FreeBSD 4.x for eons now, mainly because of the fact
that she's known in our environment ... UNIONFS isn't perfect, but all
of the obvious/major bugs have been worked out of her, etc ... but, she's
also a dead branch, so any outstanding bugs, nobody is interested in
fixing
I was thinking to do kernel programming can anybody tell please tell me what
the linuxulator is
Regards...
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 10:45:18AM -0700, salman rafique wrote..
I was thinking to do kernel programming can anybody tell please tell me what
the linuxulator is
The LINUX emulator.
A bit of research would have told you that..
--
Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vivek Khera a écrit :
On Jun 13, 2005, at 11:01 AM, Philippe PEGON wrote:
I contacted the author of the PR and he said he has the same problem
on two servers which seems to work fine with Linux : a HP Proliant
ML110 and an IBM. The only workaround he found is to disable SMP and
HTT. For
On Jun 14, 2005, at 2:07 PM, Philippe PEGON wrote:
Vivek Khera a écrit :
On Jun 13, 2005, at 11:01 AM, Philippe PEGON wrote:
I contacted the author of the PR and he said he has the same
problem on two servers which seems to work fine with Linux : a
HP Proliant ML110 and an IBM. The
Jon Simola wrote:
On 6/11/05, Paul Mather [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found array rebuilding to be troublesome on atacontrol RAID
Some bits from the in-house documentation I've been writing. I've
tested this on multiple occasions on my 1U Supermicro SATA boxes, so
might possibly be
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 06:43:55PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:58:36AM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:22:07AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jun 14, 2005, at 11:10 AM, K?vesd?n G?bor wrote:
For scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d You
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:19:04AM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
It's b) and this guess is wrong because we don't do any detection of
rcorder compatable scripts yet. See /etc/rc.d/localpkg for exactly how
the scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d get run.
My suggestion would be to write up a single
Has anyone tested this?
It doesn't seem to work for me (although from some brief googling I
got the impression it should).
In my testing the carp0 for em3 interface negotiates MASTER/BACKUP
as it should, however the carp1 interface never leaves the 'INIT'
state. From another host in the 111
On 2005.06.14 14:25:13 -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:19:04AM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
It's b) and this guess is wrong because we don't do any detection of
rcorder compatable scripts yet. See /etc/rc.d/localpkg for exactly how
the scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 02:25:13PM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:19:04AM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
It's b) and this guess is wrong because we don't do any detection of
rcorder compatable scripts yet. See /etc/rc.d/localpkg for exactly how
the scripts in
Michael Grant wrote:
I've been playing with snapshots (mksnap_ffs) recently. I've got a
script which does a daily snapshot and keeps 7 days of history. Last
night, the machine crashed and when it came back up, all the snapshots
referred to the current view of the disk, i.e. I lost the 7-day
Paul Civati wrote:
Has anyone tested this?
yes, it doesn't work, carp with vlan aren't supported on FreeBSD. There is
a thread about that on freebsd-pf :
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-pf/2005-May/001033.html
It doesn't seem to work for me (although from some brief
Hi,
I just got a new Tyan S5350 using twin Xeon processors I am told this is now a
very standard motherboard.
Unfortunately when I try to boot FreeBSD 5.4 Release I get the following
errors on the IDE/ATA/SATA connection.
The errors I get during boot up are as follows:
The hard disk is not
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 12:05, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Is there anyone out there using 5-STABLE and UNIONFS that are happy with
it, or is it still very problematic?
This probably isn't the heavy-duty example you wanted, but...
I run 5.4-STABLE on a laptop, and mount /usr/ports/distfiles
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:19:39AM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
For example, I have a server with about 400 separate MRTG daemons on
it. (Yes, they must be separate, for administrative rather than
technical reasons.) Each daemon has a custom script. These aren't
ports, and they have no
Philippe PEGON [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone tested this?
yes, it doesn't work, carp with vlan aren't supported on FreeBSD. There is
a thread about that on freebsd-pf :
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-pf/2005-May/001033.html
Thanks for the pointer, the patch listed
Paul Civati a écrit :
Philippe PEGON [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone tested this?
yes, it doesn't work, carp with vlan aren't supported on FreeBSD. There is
a thread about that on freebsd-pf :
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-pf/2005-May/001033.html
Thanks for the
Philippe PEGON [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also tested it with em card and for me it only runs if I connect the
network card after the boot, otherwise I have the INIT symptom on carp's
interfaces.
Did the patch apply cleanly?
I applied it to 5.4-REL sources, part of the code was already in
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 01:18, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jun 14, 2005, at 11:19 AM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
For example, I have a server with about 400 separate MRTG daemons on
it. (Yes, they must be separate, for administrative rather than
technical reasons.) Each daemon has a custom script.
On 6/15/05, Scot Hetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/14/05, Mars G. Miro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ resent, as I forgot to add the subject, sorry ]
I've found out that there are some hurdles in doing this upgrade, as
also pointed out by another user [0]. The problem is in make and I
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 10:46:22AM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 01:18, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jun 14, 2005, at 11:19 AM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
For example, I have a server with about 400 separate MRTG daemons on
it. (Yes, they must be separate, for administrative
43 matches
Mail list logo
