Re: Too short ethernet frame...

2005-08-18 Thread Ian Dowse
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Iva Hesy writes: OK, now, I get the result: tag=RELENG_6 date=2005.07.30.22.00.00 works fine, tag=RELENG_6 date=2005.07.31.03.00.00 makes noise, many many ethernet frames can be sniffered. the cvsup log: Updating collection src-all/cvs Edit src/sys/dev/mlx/mlx_pci.c

portsdb (Warning: Duplicate INDEX)

2005-08-18 Thread bob self
My system: --- FreeBSD ..org 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Mon Aug 15 19:06:46 EDT 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 The problem: I ran cvsup with no problems. But then I ran portsdb and I get these warnings: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: portsdb (Warning: Duplicate INDEX)

2005-08-18 Thread Zimmerman, Eric
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bob self Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 08:05 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: portsdb (Warning: Duplicate INDEX) My system: --- FreeBSD ..org 5.4-STABLE

Re: portsdb (Warning: Duplicate INDEX)

2005-08-18 Thread Benjamin Lutz
You can try downloading a new index: cd /usr/ports make fetchindex Then run portsdb again. Cheers Benjamin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: portsdb (Warning: Duplicate INDEX)

2005-08-18 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 09:04:38AM -0400, bob self wrote: My system: --- FreeBSD ..org 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Mon Aug 15 19:06:46 EDT 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 The problem: I ran cvsup with no problems. But

Re: acc Monitor error message

2005-08-18 Thread Vinny Abello
At 11:25 PM 8/17/2005, Huang wen hui wrote: hi, I have DELL PE4600 server with acc driver , running 5.4 Release. when system boot, got this message: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/aacd0s1a aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Error Event [command:0x2a] aac0: **Monitor** ID(0:02:0); Hardware Error

nve0 nvidia onboard ethernet dies daily on 6.0 beta1

2005-08-18 Thread alan bryan
I'm still having problems with my onboard ethernet. It usually runs for a day or two and then I see this in the dmesg: ... nve0: device timeout (63) nve0: link state changed to DOWN nve0: link state changed to UP nve0: device timeout (63) nve0: link state changed to DOWN nve0: link state changed

Re: nve0 nvidia onboard ethernet dies daily on 6.0 beta1

2005-08-18 Thread Kövesdán Gábor
alan bryan wrote: I'm still having problems with my onboard ethernet. It usually runs for a day or two and then I see this in the dmesg: ... nve0: device timeout (63) nve0: link state changed to DOWN nve0: link state changed to UP nve0: device timeout (63) nve0: link state changed to DOWN

Re: nve0 nvidia onboard ethernet dies daily on 6.0 beta1

2005-08-18 Thread alan bryan
Forgot to also add the details of the Ethernet as it's being detected if that helps: nve0: NVIDIA nForce MCP9 Networking Adapter port 0xb000-0xb007 mem 0xd810-0xd8100fff irq 5 at device 10.0 on pci0 nve0: Ethernet address 00:30:1b:b8:86:dc miibus0: MII bus on nve0 ukphy0: Generic IEEE 802.3u

Re: nve0 nvidia onboard ethernet dies daily on 6.0 beta1

2005-08-18 Thread alan bryan
--- Kövesdán Gábor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The nve driver has a lot of problems. You experienced just device timeouts, but other people - including me - experiences system crashes. As for me, I've had two kind of kernel panics, and device timeouts too. Cheers, Gabor Kovesdan Do you

Re: nve0 nvidia onboard ethernet dies daily on 6.0 beta1

2005-08-18 Thread Kövesdán Gábor
alan bryan wrote: --- Kövesdán Gábor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The nve driver has a lot of problems. You experienced just device timeouts, but other people - including me - experiences system crashes. As for me, I've had two kind of kernel panics, and device timeouts too. Cheers, Gabor

Re: Too short ethernet frame...

2005-08-18 Thread Christian S.J. Peron
Yes, This appears to be a mistake on my part, please commit this patch. Thanks for catching this! On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 09:59:50AM +0100, Ian Dowse wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Iva Hesy writes: OK, now, I get the result: tag=RELENG_6 date=2005.07.30.22.00.00 works fine,

Re: Too short ethernet frame...

2005-08-18 Thread Christian S.J. Peron
Or if you want, I will commit it. On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 09:59:50AM +0100, Ian Dowse wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Iva Hesy writes: OK, now, I get the result: tag=RELENG_6 date=2005.07.30.22.00.00 works fine, tag=RELENG_6 date=2005.07.31.03.00.00 makes noise, many many ethernet frames

Re: DELL SC430 ahd0: Adaptec 39320A Ultra320 SCSI adapter

2005-08-18 Thread Hutterer Robert
Thank you very much for the reaction (about a dozen user reported similar problems the last month -but there seems no answer/solution) From what I can tell from the full card dump state, the 39320 attempted to send 77 transactions to your drive during a single connection. This connection

Re: DELL SC430 ahd0: Adaptec 39320A Ultra320 SCSI adapter

2005-08-18 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
--On Friday, August 19, 2005 12:20 AM +0200 Hutterer Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you very much for the reaction (about a dozen user reported similar problems the last month -but there seems no answer/solution) From what I can tell from the full card dump state, the 39320 attempted

Re: DELL SC430 ahd0: Adaptec 39320A Ultra320 SCSI adapter

2005-08-18 Thread Ronald Klop
I had (about) the same problem at a linux server at my work last weekend. But is was not repeatable for me. Maybe it contains some info which helps you. Log: http://ronald.klop.ws/~ronald/linux.scsi.txt Ronald. On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 00:20:41 +0200, Hutterer Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: DELL SC430 ahd0: Adaptec 39320A Ultra320 SCSI adapter

2005-08-18 Thread Ronald Klop
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 01:29:03 +0200, Ronald Klop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had (about) the same problem at a linux server at my work last weekend. But is was not repeatable for me. Maybe it contains some info which helps you. Log: http://ronald.klop.ws/~ronald/linux.scsi.txt Forgot to

Re: Too short ethernet frame...

2005-08-18 Thread Iva Hesy
On 8/18/05, Ian Dowse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There appear to be some braces missed in that revision of bpf.c. Does the following patch help? Ian Thank you very much, your patch works fine for me... ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

update from 5.4RELESE to 5.4RELEASEP1 how

2005-08-18 Thread jiann chen
Hi, I am new to FreeBSD. Please let me know the setup steps to update from 5.4RELEASE to 5.4RELEASEP1. Thanks, - Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org

panic: page fault while in kernel mode

2005-08-18 Thread Rong-En Fan
Hi all, It is an 5.4-STABLE running on i386, date is about Aug 10 4am UTC. When I'm doing: cat /var/log/maillog | ./log.pl to do some log analysis, I panicked this system. Here are some console log and kgdb output. I'll keeping this dump for sometime, so if anyone wants any information, feel free