Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Ronald Klop wrote: PS.: Just did an upgrade remote from 5.4-RELEASE to 6.0-RELEASE without any problems. Steps taken as described above ;) How do you reboot into single-usermode from remote? (Rebooting isn't really the problem, working in single-usermode is.)

kernel problem

2005-11-10 Thread Jens Holmqvist
hello i got a problem with my 6.0 GENERIC kernel i have done a kgdb on the dumps it gave out here is the output [EMAIL PROTECTED]kgdb kernel.debug /usr/local/var/crash/vmcore.1 [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: /usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined symbol

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2005-11-10 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2005-11-10 08:36:54 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2005-11-10 08:36:54 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2005-11-10 08:36:54 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2005-11-10 08:37:19 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2005-11-10 08:37:19 - cd

unmount pending error on 6.0

2005-11-10 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
Hi, [ Please Cc: me in replies, I'm not subscribed to this list. ] I run a recent RELENG_6 from three days ago. This is my file server and all my drives are doubled. I made a small script that mounts the mirror disk, rsync all files to it and finally unmount it. While testing this script, I

Re: kernel problem

2005-11-10 Thread Jens Holmqvist
On 11/10/05, Jens Holmqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello i got a problem with my 6.0 GENERIC kernel i have done a kgdb on the dumps it gave out here is the output [EMAIL PROTECTED]kgdb kernel.debug /usr/local/var/crash/vmcore.1 [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads:

Re: unmount pending error on 6.0

2005-11-10 Thread Xin LI
On 11/10/05, Jeremie Le Hen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I run a recent RELENG_6 from three days ago. This is my file server and all my drives are doubled. I made a small script that mounts the mirror disk, rsync all files to it and finally unmount it. While testing this script, I interrupted

Re: Filesystems 1TB not possible on 6.0-R (anymore?).

2005-11-10 Thread Xin LI
On 11/9/05, Barkley Vowk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got a 3TB (7 x 500GB w/ hot-spare) array on an areca board in amd64. Under 5.4-R I could have 1TB filesystems without an issue. I recall not having problems with 6.0-BETA5 too. [snip] Would you please consider to try gpt instead of

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Pete French
Thanks for all the comments - it sounds like it's a pretty safe thing to do. I have one more question though - when I upgrade a machine this wa I will remove all the ports first, so it is just back to the basic system. But Perl is now a port - should I remove this, or should I leave it alone, i.e.

After 6.0-RELEASE, still cannot find ATA disk com VIA8235

2005-11-10 Thread João Carlos Mendes Luis
Hi, After 5.4-RELEASE I did try to install FreeBSD on a spare desktop at work, but it failed to boot, with a kernel trap 12 and ATA_IDENTIFY time out. Knowning that 6.0 has a completely new ata driver, I did it again. Now the system boots, and shows absolutely no error message. But

Adaptec SATA 1210SA+ Freebsd 6.0

2005-11-10 Thread Filip Wuytack
Hi, I just installed freebsd 6 and it all runs fine, but when I try (via sysinstall) to make a new label on a partition on ar0, the system says: 'ata2 disconnect requested' and freezes. I there something extra I need to do make ar0 to work properly? Many thanks, Filip This is the output of my

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Andreas Nemeth
On Thursday 10 November 2005 12:27, Pete French wrote: Thanks for all the comments - it sounds like it's a pretty safe thing to do. I have one more question though - when I upgrade a machine this way I will remove all the ports first, so it is just back to the basic system. But Perl is now a

TCP error messages in 6.0

2005-11-10 Thread Patrik Roos
After 6.0 hit stable, I decided to upgrade my machine. Uname now reads: FreeBSD pumpkin.lolikon.org 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #0: Sat Nov 5 08:12:50 CET 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PUMPKIN i386 After the upgrade, however, I started getting spurts of error messages posted

Re: Apache2, mod_python and nss_ldap: Coredump...

2005-11-10 Thread Johan Ström
On 10 nov 2005, at 00.25, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:20:26AM +0100, Johan Ström wrote: Hi I got a new 6.0-STABLE box. Rebuilt kernel and world 2 hours ago (against RELENG_6), so it should be pretty new. Im trying to have apache 2.0.55, mod_python 3.1.4 and

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Pete French
You don't have to remove the ports prior to upgrading. Just recompile them later. Why would I want to do that though ? It gives me no advantages, and some serious disadvantages (especially if I am doing this on a 'live' system). Much easier to delete everything prior to the upgrade, and then I

RE: Adaptec SATA 1210SA+ Freebsd 6.0

2005-11-10 Thread Filip Wuytack
Hi, I also tried to create the label via the command line (following the handbook). web2# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ar0 count=2 2+0 records in 2+0 records out 1024 bytes transferred in 0.000757 secs (1352746 bytes/sec) web2# disklabel /dev/ar0 | disklabel -B -R -r ar0 /dev/stdin disklabel:

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:27:52 + Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: will remove all the ports first, so it is just back to the basic system. But Perl is now a port - should I remove this, or should I leave it alone, i.e. is it required for the build process ? No, nothing outside

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Pete French
No, nothing outside the base system is required to build the base system. But don't nuke the ports before running cvsup :) Heh, I have done that in the past, I have to admit :-) Also must note that one should not remove ones login shell before changing back to /bin/sh if one wants to be

Re: Anyone having problems with xorg 6.8.2 on 6.0-R

2005-11-10 Thread Roland Smith
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 08:47:41PM -0500, Will Saxon wrote: Hello, I upgraded my amd64 installation to 6.0-RELEASE, and I am no longer able to use X. It exits with a signal 11 error. I have recompiled from ports, installed from packages from freebsd.org and performed a clean installation

Re: Filesystems 1TB not possible on 6.0-R (anymore?).

2005-11-10 Thread David Kirchner
On 11/9/05, Barkley Vowk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got a 3TB (7 x 500GB w/ hot-spare) array on an areca board in amd64. Under 5.4-R I could have 1TB filesystems without an issue. I recall not having problems with 6.0-BETA5 too. However, 6.0-R gives me a tragic: /dev/da0s1d723G

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Oliver Fromme
Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, nothing outside the base system is required to build the base system. But don't nuke the ports before running cvsup :) Heh, I have done that in the past, I have to admit :-) Also must note that one should not remove ones login shell

Re: Apache2, mod_python and nss_ldap: Coredump...

2005-11-10 Thread David Adam
I can't help with most of your problem, but... On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Johan Ström wrote: Is there any way to check if a lib is strip'd/got debug symbols or not? file(1) will tell you. /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/libmagic/compress.o: ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), not

Re: After 6.0-RELEASE, still cannot find ATA disk com VIA8235

2005-11-10 Thread Oliver Fromme
João Carlos Mendes Luis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After 5.4-RELEASE I did try to install FreeBSD on a spare desktop at work, but it failed to boot, with a kernel trap 12 and ATA_IDENTIFY time out. Knowning that 6.0 has a completely new ata driver, I did it again. Now the

ahd0: Invalid Sequencer interrupt occurred.

2005-11-10 Thread Ricardo A. Reis
Hi all, The University where i work recent acquire a new server, i install FreeBSD 6.0 and update for STABLE yestarday, in dmesg i see this messages ahd0: Invalid Sequencer interrupt occurred. full-dmesg-output Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983,

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Filip Lenaerts
hi all On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 11:17:13AM +, Jan Grant wrote: FWIW I've just done a successful remote source-based upgrade from 5.4 to 6.0 (I'm brave) with no problems. I use a second root and /usr to be also did that last night with the latest sources, but failed when booting in

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Jan Grant
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Filip Lenaerts wrote: hi all On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 11:17:13AM +, Jan Grant wrote: FWIW I've just done a successful remote source-based upgrade from 5.4 to 6.0 (I'm brave) with no problems. I use a second root and /usr to be also did that last night with

Re: kernel problem

2005-11-10 Thread Xin LI
On 11/10/05, Jens Holmqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] trap number = 30 panic: unknown/reserved trap Uptime: 46m5s Looks weird. Would you please also attach the dmesg.boot generated with boot -v (or verbose boot if you use beastie boot menu), which may be helpful for us to figure out

Re: Apache2, mod_python and nss_ldap: Coredump

2005-11-10 Thread Johan Ström
On 10 nov 2005, at 13.55, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 01:46:37PM +0100, Johan Ström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote a message of 112 lines which said: Im trying to have apache 2.0.55, mod_python 3.1.4 and nss_ldap 239, all the latest from ports. The problem I have is this: If

RE: Anyone having problems with xorg 6.8.2 on 6.0-R

2005-11-10 Thread Will Saxon
-Original Message- From: Roland Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 7:38 AM To: Will Saxon Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Anyone having problems with xorg 6.8.2 on 6.0-R For DRI, you need an extra device on 6.0. On 5.4 it used to be: device

Re: kernel problem

2005-11-10 Thread Jens Holmqvist
On 11/10/05, Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/10/05, Jens Holmqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] trap number = 30 panic: unknown/reserved trap Uptime: 46m5s Looks weird. Would you please also attach the dmesg.boot generated with boot -v (or verbose boot if you use beastie

Re: Apache2, mod_python and nss_ldap: Coredump...

2005-11-10 Thread Johan Ström
On 10 nov 2005, at 12.54, Johan Ström wrote: On 10 nov 2005, at 00.25, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:20:26AM +0100, Johan Ström wrote: Hi I got a new 6.0-STABLE box. Rebuilt kernel and world 2 hours ago (against RELENG_6), so it should be pretty new. Im trying

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Marwan Burelle
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 02:13:26PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: Under some circumstances it can also be useful to have an emergency user which is not dependant on anything outside the base system (i.e. doesn't use anything from /usr/local, doesn't have its home on an NFS volume, doesn't has

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Oliver Fromme
Marwan Burelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 02:13:26PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: Under some circumstances it can also be useful to have an emergency user which is not dependant on anything outside the base system (i.e. doesn't use anything from /usr/local,

Re: ATA RAID problem in 6.0-RC1 (ata_alloc_request/ata_raid_init_request)

2005-11-10 Thread David Taylor
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, David Taylor wrote: I've been seeing a number of strange messages in my log since updating to 6.0-RC1. Usually they happen when some intense disk access is happening (e.g. when /etc/periodic/security/100.chksetuid is running at 03:01), but it doesn't happen _every_

Re: ATA RAID problem in 6.0-RC1 (ata_alloc_request/ata_raid_init_request)

2005-11-10 Thread Michael Butler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Taylor wrote: | [snip] | | I'm still seeing (lots) of these messages (below) on 6.0-RELEASE. | Should I just file a PR about it, and is there anything else that | would be useful to track down what's causing them? I get these with an

Re: ATA RAID problem in 6.0-RC1 (ata_alloc_request/ata_raid_init_request)

2005-11-10 Thread David Taylor
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Michael Butler wrote: David Taylor wrote: | [snip] | | I'm still seeing (lots) of these messages (below) on 6.0-RELEASE. | Should I just file a PR about it, and is there anything else that | would be useful to track down what's causing them? I get these with an

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread David Kirchner
On 11/10/05, Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I vote for /sbin/nologin as root's login shell. In single-user mode, the systems asks for the shell, with /bin/sh being the default. In multi-user mode, nobody should ever log in as root. You rather log in as normal user and then

Re: ATA RAID problem in 6.0-RC1 (ata_alloc_request/ata_raid_init_request)

2005-11-10 Thread Michael Butler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Taylor wrote: | ar0: 156334MB Promise Fasttrak RAID1 status: READY | ar0: disk0 READY (master) using ad6 at ata3-master | ar0: disk1 READY (mirror) using ad4 at ata2-master Ok - so the apparent kernel memory leak appears to be associated with

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Paul T. Root
How is this different from a fresh install? Except for a very limited amount in config files, which would be easier to save and restore. And home directories. Again, save and restore. Pete French wrote: *** This message has been scanned by the InterScan for CSC-SSM and found

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Pete French
How is this different from a fresh install? It doesnt require physical access to the machine and a CD drive (or any of the other hoops I sometime jump through to boot the install process). Much easier. -pcf. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

usbd.conf

2005-11-10 Thread Petr Holub
Hi, I've found that usbd on 6.0-RELEASE doesn't react on detach event properly: usbd.conf: device iKey 3000 Series Token vendor 0x04b9 product 0x1300 detach /usr/local/etc/rc.d/openct.sh stop attach /usr/local/etc/rc.d/openct.sh start what happens (usbd -d -): usbd:

Re: Filesystems 1TB not possible on 6.0-R (anymore?).

2005-11-10 Thread David Kirchner
On 11/9/05, Barkley Vowk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No. The installer showed only one slice da0s1d, and the whole disk was assigned to it. I'd check on the running box but: koth# disklabel -e /dev/da0 disklabel: disks with more than 2^32-1 sectors are not supported /dev only shows: koth# ls

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-10 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 18:26, Paul Root wrote: Michael C. Shultz wrote: *** This message has been scanned by the InterScan for CSC-SSM and found to be free of known security risks. ***-*** port and install or restart gnome-upgrade.sh I'm now

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-10 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Thursday 10 November 2005 09:42, Paul T. Root wrote: I moved the machine to a DSL line here, and am running portmanager. It seems to be working. We're going to investigate issues with this beta Cisco ASA machine. I am very interested at how things go with your upgrade, please keep me

Re: Filesystems 1TB not possible on 6.0-R (anymore?).

2005-11-10 Thread David Kirchner
On 11/10/05, Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would you please consider to try gpt instead of bsdlabel? BTW. The dmesg meesage indicates that your array is degraded :-( Is it possible to have sysinstall use gpt instead of bsdlabel, and then to boot from a gpt based array? I haven't had luck

Re: kernel panic with cdrecord

2005-11-10 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 18:41:05 +0100 Torfinn Ingolfsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but anything else fails. (Ok, I have tested the vommands -toc, -msinfo, -prcap, -atip, -checkdrive, -prcap) Ok, the machine now has 6.0-release / amd64 on it, and the error seems to be gone. At least none of the

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-10 Thread Paul T. Root
Things are running better now. I moved it to a dedicated DSL line in my lab, and it's chugging along. I see an occasional g_vfs_done message fly across. Error 16 on a read. Something like g_vfs_done: acd0[READ(offset=81920, length=2048) Error = 16 Opps, I crashed the machine. When I moved it,

Re: gnome-upgrade.sh

2005-11-10 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Thursday 10 November 2005 11:32, Paul T. Root wrote: Things are running better now. I moved it to a dedicated DSL line in my lab, and it's chugging along. I see an occasional g_vfs_done message fly across. Error 16 on a read. Something like g_vfs_done: acd0[READ(offset=81920,

Consistent 6.0-STABLE Hang

2005-11-10 Thread Cy Schubert
Running the Citrix ICA wfcmgr (from ports) to change settings, e.g. password, for connection to a Windows terminal server hangs FreeBSD 6.0 (as of Nov 4) quite consistently. I've tried this on one of my 6.0 systems at home and a 6.0 system here at work. I suspect it may have something to do

Re: loader.conf setting ignored

2005-11-10 Thread Ben Kelly
Sarxan Elxanzade wrote: It looks like console access is necessary. But may be someone prompt another solution. So it turns out you can set kern.geom.debugflags from loader.conf. The gvinum mirror problem I was trying to debug was causing the problem. Edits to loader.conf were only being

Crashing after umounting unavailable filesystems

2005-11-10 Thread William Denton
On 10 November 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote: Opps, I crashed the machine. When I moved it, I unplugged the USB DVD-RW and I had mounted one of the dist discs on there. When I did a umount it paniced. My bad. That happened to me the other day too. I'd mounted a USB flash drive, unplugged

Re: upgrading 5.4 - 6.0 without reinstalling. safe ?

2005-11-10 Thread Filip Lenaerts
You have an option to use the FreeBSD agp device support or nVidia's. I have no idea what criteria one might use to select between them. i'll try recompiling this evening the port and try a boot -s :) If the device is loaded from /boot/loader.conf you might need to disable that in

Re: i386/87208 : /dev/cuad[0/1] bad file descriptor error during

2005-11-10 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! I'm CCing this follow-up to freebsd-stable because this problem can prevent use of RELENG_6 machines in production (mgetty is quite usual example of such a use). This bug is a regression vs. RELENG_5/4. My analysis shows that it isn't only dup() problem. File descriptor 0 get somehow

Re: loader.conf setting ignored

2005-11-10 Thread Craig Boston
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 03:57:56PM -0500, Ben Kelly wrote: So it turns out you can set kern.geom.debugflags from loader.conf. The gvinum mirror problem I was trying to debug was causing the problem. Edits to loader.conf were only being written to the second disk, but the loader was reading

Re: ahd0: Invalid Sequencer interrupt occurred.

2005-11-10 Thread Ade Lovett
On Nov 10, 2005, at 05:30 , Ricardo A. Reis wrote: Reducing the problem to the relevant pieces: ahd0: Adaptec AIC7902 Ultra320 SCSI adapter port 0x2400-0x24ff, 0x2000-0x20ff mem 0xdd20-0xdd201fff irq 32 at device 2.0 on pci3 ahd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI

Re: loader.conf setting ignored

2005-11-10 Thread Craig Boston
Oh, ignore me I just read the thread from beginning and saw that you already thought of that and didn't have console access :-/ Craig ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To

RE: usbd.conf

2005-11-10 Thread Darren Pilgrim
usbd is deprecated. Please use devd. From: Petr Holub I've found that usbd on 6.0-RELEASE doesn't react on detach event properly: ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To

GENERIC kernel, crashing server

2005-11-10 Thread Jens Holmqvist
hello i got a problem with my server running 6.0 sometimes it just crashes and reboots i dont know why this fenomena might be when there is lot of access to my ar0 i have cut all access to it atm and havent crashed just a guess though but here is the output of kgdb with backtrace and below you

gvinum forgetting drives in 6.0R?

2005-11-10 Thread Marc Ramirez
I'm doing some testing in 6.0, and something strange is happening: 1) uname -a FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 2) I build a stripe set using 'gvinum create' and the following config: drive dr3