Re: gnokii on FreeBSD 6.0 and Dell PE 2850

2006-04-04 Thread Morten A. Middelthon
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 03:17:36PM +0100, Anders Nordby wrote: Hi, Interesting problem, as I am also going to move my Gnokii phone to 6.0 soon. Did you try your phone with gnokii, running 6.0 on another system? Maybe the problem is with the serial port on your server. Hi, I have upgraded

Re: gnokii on FreeBSD 6.0 and Dell PE 2850

2006-04-04 Thread Morten A. Middelthon
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 12:13:50PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mar 22 08:41:38 nefarian kernel: sio0: 2 more silo overflows (total 16) This is often related to interrupt contention. Probably your new machine shares the IRQ of /dev/cuad0 with other devices. If another device hangs on

Re: FreeBSD unstable on Dell 1750 using SMP?

2006-04-04 Thread Rutger Bevaart
Argh. After all the fixes done on the 5.4-STABLE and 6.0 codebases my Dell PE1750 still reboots randomly. Again last night at 03.03 :- ( essages still shows nothing, nothing special was going on at the time (loadavg ~ 0.00). It's running: FreeBSD xyz 6.0-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE-p4

Re: Problem with Razer Copperhead (USB-mouse)

2006-04-04 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
The problem is that the Razer Copperhead registers itself as a mouse and a keyboard. FreeBSD in connection with some mainboards seems to have problems with that, but you can get a Firmware from Razer that removes this behaviour. The mouse will not support recorded macros anymore after the patch.

Re: [HACKERS] semaphore usage port based?

2006-04-04 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Mon, 2006-Apr-03 14:55:10 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: That is all I'm advocatin / asking for ... some way of reverting kill(PID, 0) back to the old, FreeBSD 4.x behaviour, where this works beautifully :( At least until someone does get around to 'virtualization of SysV IPC' :( There's the

Re: new feature: private IPC for every jail

2006-04-04 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Mon, 2006-Apr-03 16:34:59 +0100, Robert Watson wrote: (2) The name space model for system v ipc is flat, so while it's desirable to allow the administrator in the host environment to monitor and control resource use in the jail (for example, delete allocated but unused segments),

Re: new feature: private IPC for every jail

2006-04-04 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Peter Jeremy wrote: On Mon, 2006-Apr-03 16:34:59 +0100, Robert Watson wrote: (2) The name space model for system v ipc is flat, so while it's desirable to allow the administrator in the host environment to monitor and control resource use in the jail (for example,

Re: new feature: private IPC for every jail

2006-04-04 Thread Koen Martens
Robert Watson wrote: Hmm. This sounds like it might be workable. To make sure I understand your proposal: - We add a new prison ID field to the in-kernel description of each segment, semaphore, message queue, etc. This is initialized to the prison ID of the process creating the

Re: new feature: private IPC for every jail

2006-04-04 Thread Koen Martens
Koen Martens wrote: FWIW, I already implemented this once for 5.x a while back, but abandoned the project due to lack of time back then. If no-one else is going to pick this up, i might try and dig up that code again, and port it to 6.x, since this feature is still quite high on my wish

Re: new feature: private IPC for every jail

2006-04-04 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Koen Martens wrote: FWIW, I already implemented this once for 5.x a while back, but abandoned the project due to lack of time back then. If no-one else is going to pick this up, i might try and dig up that code again, and port it to 6.x, since this feature is still quite

Re: Problem with Razer Copperhead (USB-mouse)

2006-04-04 Thread Christian Baer
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:09:18 +0200 [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: The problem is that the Razer Copperhead registers itself as a mouse and a keyboard. FreeBSD in connection with some mainboards seems to have problems with that, but you can get a Firmware from Razer that removes this behaviour. Can you

Re: new feature: private IPC for every jail

2006-04-04 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Tue, 2006-Apr-04 11:47:14 +0100, Robert Watson wrote: Hmm. This sounds like it might be workable. To make sure I understand your proposal: - We add a new prison ID field to the in-kernel description of each segment, - shmget(), et al, will, in addition to matching the key when searching for

Re: new feature: private IPC for every jail

2006-04-04 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Peter Jeremy wrote: On Tue, 2006-Apr-04 11:47:14 +0100, Robert Watson wrote: Hmm. This sounds like it might be workable. To make sure I understand your proposal: - We add a new prison ID field to the in-kernel description of each segment, - shmget(), et al, will, in

Re: Problem with Razer Copperhead (USB-mouse)

2006-04-04 Thread Christian Baer
On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 22:10:12 -0400 Anish Mistry wrote: Is there a ukbd in your dmesg? If there is, I'd suggest loading=20 kbdmux. Yes there is - but only the darn mouse. Not sure if I need a keyboard multiplexer, since I rather need to *ignore* this keyboard. Currently there isn't support

Re: new feature: private IPC for every jail

2006-04-04 Thread Michael Butler
Robert Watson wrote: Would it make more sense to simply allocate ID's sequentially, and simply not allow access to objects with a non-matching prison? .. This depends on the expected size of the system-wide pool; sequential allocation invites sequential searches of the name/id-space when

Re: new feature: private IPC for every jail

2006-04-04 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Julian Elischer wrote: (2) The name space model for system v ipc is flat, so while it's desirable to allow the administrator in the host environment to monitor and control resource use in the jail (for example, delete allocated but unused segments),

Re: new feature: private IPC for every jail

2006-04-04 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: However, I can't find info whether / is legal as the 1st character of IPC object ID. If yes, we should use another prefix. This approach won't work if there are no restriction on IPC object IDs 1st character. Are there any? System V IPC object

Re: Problem with Razer Copperhead (USB-mouse)

2006-04-04 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
Christian Baer wrote: On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:09:18 +0200 [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: The problem is that the Razer Copperhead registers itself as a mouse and a keyboard. FreeBSD in connection with some mainboards seems to have problems with that, but you can get a Firmware from Razer that removes

Re: FreeBSD unstable on Dell 1750 using SMP?

2006-04-04 Thread Vivek Khera
On Apr 4, 2006, at 4:37 AM, Rutger Bevaart wrote: I'm completely at a loss, and inclined to remove FreeBSD and install another OS as it is an important management machine for us, that reboots about monthly. Any clues, tips, help, know bugs? Either bad hardware or pilot error. Here's

Re: [HACKERS] semaphore usage port based?

2006-04-04 Thread Vivek Khera
On Apr 3, 2006, at 3:41 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote: ... and you *still* haven't shown *why* kill() reporting a PID is in use, even if its not in the current jail, is such a security threat ... For reducing attacks I suppose. But conceptually, something running in a jail shouldn't be allowed

Re: [HACKERS] semaphore usage port based?

2006-04-04 Thread Vivek Khera
On Apr 3, 2006, at 8:07 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: All PostgreSQL processes use port * 1000 as their starting port for semId ... if port * 1000 is reported as in use, the first thing that the PostgreSQL process does is kill(PID, 0) the PID returned by semctl(GETPID) to see if, in fact,

Re: [HACKERS] semaphore usage port based?

2006-04-04 Thread Craig Boston
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:17:18AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: Perhaps you can hack into the postgresql master a flag that alters the 1000 parameter, or starts at a port * 1000 + N, then hard-code that flag into your startup script per jail. A quick and dirty hack to fudge with the requested

Re: Problem with Razer Copperhead (USB-mouse)

2006-04-04 Thread Anish Mistry
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 07:41, Christian Baer wrote: On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 22:10:12 -0400 Anish Mistry wrote: Is there a ukbd in your dmesg? If there is, I'd suggest loading=20 kbdmux. Yes there is - but only the darn mouse. Not sure if I need a keyboard multiplexer, since I rather need to

Have the expanded rcorder behaviour merged to RELENG_5?

2006-04-04 Thread Kövesdán Gábor
Hello, I saw in the Porters Handbook this OSVERSION macro: 6.0-STABLE after incorporating scripts from the local_startup directories into the base rcorder(8) http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=rcordersektion=8. 600101 I think that change has been merged to the RELENG_5 branch but I1m

Re: Problem with Razer Copperhead (USB-mouse)

2006-04-04 Thread Joe Altman
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:07:24AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 14. Problem with Razer Copperhead (USB-mouse) (Christian Baer) -- Message: 14 Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 01:37:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Christian Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Problem with Razer

Re: [HACKERS] semaphore usage port based?

2006-04-04 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Peter Jeremy wrote: On Mon, 2006-Apr-03 14:55:10 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: That is all I'm advocatin / asking for ... some way of reverting kill(PID, 0) back to the old, FreeBSD 4.x behaviour, where this works beautifully :( At least until someone does get around to

Re: Issues with nullconsole in FreeBSD 6.0-p6

2006-04-04 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Jonas Blow wrote this message on Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 00:24 +0200: I've tried to debug the problem. I've not figured out how to remotely debug a kernel when using nullconsole. The escape to debugger hot keys (Ctrl+Alt+Esc or Ctrl+SysReq) does not work when using nullconsole. Therefor it is not

Re: new feature: private IPC for every jail

2006-04-04 Thread Julian Elischer
Robert Watson wrote: On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Peter Jeremy wrote: On Mon, 2006-Apr-03 16:34:59 +0100, Robert Watson wrote: (2) The name space model for system v ipc is flat, so while it's desirable to allow the administrator in the host environment to monitor and control resource use

Re: FreeBSD unstable on Dell 1750 using SMP?

2006-04-04 Thread Charles Swiger
On Apr 4, 2006, at 4:37 AM, Rutger Bevaart wrote: This because we have 2850's that experience exactly the same problems, just less frequently (about once every 4 months). I'm completely at a loss, and inclined to remove FreeBSD and install another OS as it is an important management machine

Is Makefile.inc1 in 6 wrong?

2006-04-04 Thread Lars Eighner
It appears to me that either I have a wrong version of awk or this Makefile.inc1 is wrong: # # $FreeBSD: src/Makefile.inc1,v 1.499.2.11 2006/04/04 14:24:03 glebius Exp $ # Snippage MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX?= /usr/obj .if !defined(OSRELDATE) .if exists(/usr/include/osreldate.h) OSRELDATE!= awk

Re: Is Makefile.inc1 in 6 wrong?

2006-04-04 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 05:14 pm, Lars Eighner wrote: It appears to me that either I have a wrong version of awk or this Makefile.inc1 is wrong: # # $FreeBSD: src/Makefile.inc1,v 1.499.2.11 2006/04/04 14:24:03 glebius Exp $ # Snippage MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX?=/usr/obj .if

Re: Is Makefile.inc1 in 6 wrong?

2006-04-04 Thread Lars Eighner
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Tuesday 04 April 2006 05:14 pm, Lars Eighner wrote: It appears to me that either I have a wrong version of awk or this Makefile.inc1 is wrong: # # $FreeBSD: src/Makefile.inc1,v 1.499.2.11 2006/04/04 14:24:03 glebius Exp $ # Snippage

Re: gmirror on existing filesystem (was Fresh install on gmirror'ed disks?)

2006-04-04 Thread Mike Jakubik
Eric Anderson wrote: Mike Jakubik wrote: Craig Boston wrote: On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 09:04:02AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote: There's no need to copy files around. gmirror handles it all for you behind the scenes. Just create the gmirror labels using the existing disks/slices/partitions,

Re: Is Makefile.inc1 in 6 wrong?

2006-04-04 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 05:32 pm, Lars Eighner wrote: On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Tuesday 04 April 2006 05:14 pm, Lars Eighner wrote: It appears to me that either I have a wrong version of awk or this Makefile.inc1 is wrong: # # $FreeBSD: src/Makefile.inc1,v 1.499.2.11

Re: Is Makefile.inc1 in 6 wrong?

2006-04-04 Thread Lars Eighner
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Tuesday 04 April 2006 05:32 pm, Lars Eighner wrote: On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Tuesday 04 April 2006 05:14 pm, Lars Eighner wrote: It appears to me that either I have a wrong version of awk or this Makefile.inc1 is wrong: # #

rpcbind: connect from 127.0.0.1 to dump() ??

2006-04-04 Thread Andrew Reilly
Hi there, I'm running an NFS server on one of my FreeBSD-6-STABLE systems, and it keeps putting that message into my /var/log/auth.log file. When I say keeps, there are thousands of such logs per day, sometimes separated by seconds, sometimes by many minutes or hours. I can't find anything on

Re: Is Makefile.inc1 in 6 wrong?

2006-04-04 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 06:19 pm, Lars Eighner wrote: On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Tuesday 04 April 2006 05:32 pm, Lars Eighner wrote: On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Tuesday 04 April 2006 05:14 pm, Lars Eighner wrote: It appears to me that either I have a wrong

Re: Is Makefile.inc1 in 6 wrong?

2006-04-04 Thread Andrew Reilly
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 05:19:33PM -0500, Lars Eighner wrote: I think this is wrong for a SINGLE QUOTED argument to be passed to awk. The Makefile is wrong. I am right. Make doesn't care about quotes much at all. The single-tick quotes in the awk line are the perfectly normal single tick

Re: Is Makefile.inc1 in 6 wrong?

2006-04-04 Thread Andrew Reilly
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 09:25:27AM +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote: On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 05:19:33PM -0500, Lars Eighner wrote: And also in man make. The ` is an accent key, not a quote key. Typographically, `' were often used as matching single quote pairs, in systems that had to render to

Re: make problems as non root user

2006-04-04 Thread Derek Kuliñski
Hello Chris, Sunday, April 2, 2006, 12:02:18 PM, you wrote: This happens with a lot of source apps, eggdrop, psybnc, ultimateircd etc. It only happens as non root users. It seems to only happen right after running configure, so if I do anything like cd . or logout and relogin as the user

Re: Issues with nullconsole in FreeBSD 6.0-p6

2006-04-04 Thread Doug Ambrisko
Jonas B?low writes: | I'm experiencing a really strange problem using nullconsole in FreeBSD | 6.0-p6. Briefly, what happens is that the use of nullconsole affects | the behavior of the OS negatively, very negatively. | | There are two different setups with different kernel | configurations. They