Re: portsdb

2006-05-12 Thread gareth
On Fri 2006-05-12 (07:31), Jonathan Noack wrote: Ah, I made a mistake in my explanation. Replace INDEX-5.db with INDEX-5. Sorry for the confusion... make fetchindex downloads the INDEX-x file (where 'x' is the major release number of the version of FreeBSD you are using -- in this case

Re: portsdb

2006-05-12 Thread Jonathan Noack
On 05/12/06 07:56, gareth wrote: On Fri 2006-05-12 (07:31), Jonathan Noack wrote: Ah, I made a mistake in my explanation. Replace INDEX-5.db with INDEX-5. Sorry for the confusion... make fetchindex downloads the INDEX-x file (where 'x' is the major release number of the version of FreeBSD

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-12 Thread Chris
On 12/05/06, Matthias Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jonathan Noack wrote: The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't some put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues thing. It was a long release cycle and

Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-12 Thread Chris
On 11/05/06, Mark Linimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 08:16:42PM +0100, Chris wrote: GNATS didnt reply so I will send the info about email address I used and see if I can find the pr number as well. Any problems you have with GNATS not responding, please email them to

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-12 Thread Scott Long
Chris wrote: On 12/05/06, Matthias Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jonathan Noack wrote: The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't some put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues thing. It was a long

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-12 Thread Mike Jakubik
Scott Long wrote: Sorry, things got lost in the shuffle to get this released. For your specific snapshot deadlocks, please test the changes that have gone into 7-CURRENT and report back if they fix your problem. Only with active testing will we know if they are good to be backported in time

Re: Jail testers needed (rc.d/jail)

2006-05-12 Thread Dan Rue
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:21:41AM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote: Hey lists, Two or three days before the CVS tree has been tagged for FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE, I've committed a broken version of the jail rc.d script. The symptoms are: - an ifconfig error message if you don't define a

Re: conf/97166

2006-05-12 Thread m m
Hey lists, Two or three days before the CVS tree has been tagged for FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE, I've committed a broken version of the jail rc.d script. The symptoms are: - an ifconfig error message if you don't define a jail_interface and have at least one jail configured, this one is harmless. - a

Fasttrak TX4310 RAID controller with FreeBSD-6.1

2006-05-12 Thread Lukas Razik
Hello! I've bought a Promise FastTrak TX4310 because I thought that it will be supported by FreeBSD's ata/ar driver...: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ataapropos=0sektion=0manpath=FreeBSD+6.0-stableformat=html I've updated the controller's BIOS to the newest available v2.5.1.3116:

builtin openssl and debugging?

2006-05-12 Thread Brandon Fosdick
How do I rebuild the builtin openssl with debugging symbols? I thought I could simply edit /usr/src/crypto/openssl/Makefile and then run make from the same directory, but that doesn't seem to work. Is there some way to do this w/o rebuilding world? Using the port isn't an option since I need

Re: builtin openssl and debugging?

2006-05-12 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (May 12), Brandon Fosdick said: How do I rebuild the builtin openssl with debugging symbols? I thought I could simply edit /usr/src/crypto/openssl/Makefile and then run make from the same directory, but that doesn't seem to work. Is there some way to do this w/o rebuilding

Re: RELENG_4 - 5 - 6: significant performance regression

2006-05-12 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin I don't know, it needs to be tested in your particular case. I've built another kernel, adding back makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin options QUOTA Results are almost the same as w/o these

Re: RELENG_4 - 5 - 6: significant performance regression

2006-05-12 Thread Dmitry Pryanishnikov
Hello! On Tue, 2 May 2006, Robert Watson wrote: options INVARIANTS options INVARIANT_SUPPORT In FreeBSD 5.x and FreeBSD 6.x, the INVARIANTS option has been significantly expanded to test a much larger set of invariants, and also incorporate kernel use-after-free checking,

pagezero again

2006-05-12 Thread Ivan Voras
Some time ago I reported that pagezero kernel thread sometime takes (what seems to me) a too large chunk of available CPU (30%) on a very busy web server. There were no replies :( Since then, I've reconfigured apache to use PHP as a fastcgi module and the problem seems to have gotten worse -

Re: pagezero again

2006-05-12 Thread Vlad GALU
On 5/13/06, Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some time ago I reported that pagezero kernel thread sometime takes (what seems to me) a too large chunk of available CPU (30%) on a very busy web server. There were no replies :( Since then, I've reconfigured apache to use PHP as a fastcgi module

Re: pagezero again

2006-05-12 Thread Ivan Voras
Vlad GALU wrote: How is the system, swapping-wise ? Good: no swapping, 100+ MB free memory. Free memory varies between ~90 and ~110 MB - maybe something is returning memory to the OS and reclaiming it too often? (looking at top, it could be php-cgi, but is there a way to precisely track

Re: pagezero again

2006-05-12 Thread Chuck Swiger
Ivan Voras wrote: Some time ago I reported that pagezero kernel thread sometime takes (what seems to me) a too large chunk of available CPU (30%) on a very busy web server. There were no replies :( Since then, I've reconfigured apache to use PHP as a fastcgi module and the problem seems to

Re: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

2006-05-12 Thread Mike Jakubik
David Kirchner wrote: Here's how to reproduce the snapshot deadlock I'm seeing, with 6.1-RC2 cvsup'd as of 5 or 6 hours ago: [...] It locks up every time for me, with no further disk activity. Unfortunately, for some reason, my server console became unaccessable, so I'm not able to get to the

Reproducable file corruption on 6-STABLE

2006-05-12 Thread Paul Schenkeveld
Hello, When I try to copy a large (7GB+) file from one filesystem to another the copy is not equal to te source file. This behaviour can be reproduced repeatedly. Details: - FreeBSD 6-STABLE, cvsupped yesterday - Intel L440GX+ main board, dual 700 MHz Pentium 3, 1 GB RAM - 2x Promise TX3

Re: pagezero again

2006-05-12 Thread Suleiman Souhlal
Ivan Voras wrote: Some time ago I reported that pagezero kernel thread sometime takes (what seems to me) a too large chunk of available CPU (30%) on a very busy web server. There were no replies :( Since then, I've reconfigured apache to use PHP as a fastcgi module and the problem seems to

Re: RELENG_4 - 5 - 6: significant performance regression

2006-05-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:32:44PM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: Hello! On Tue, 2 May 2006, Robert Watson wrote: options INVARIANTS options INVARIANT_SUPPORT In FreeBSD 5.x and FreeBSD 6.x, the INVARIANTS option has been significantly expanded to test a much larger set of

Re: RELENG_4 - 5 - 6: significant performance regression

2006-05-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 11:25:58PM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: Hello! On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin I don't know, it needs to be tested in your particular case. I've built another kernel, adding back makeoptions

Odd RS232 problem

2006-05-12 Thread Daniel O'Connor
Hi, I am trying to talk to a high voltage power supply unit we're using at work, it uses RS232 and you can read back current, voltage, faults, etc.. What I have seems to work fine except that occassionally I get junk read back, strangely it appears the longer my program runs the more often I see

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-12 Thread David Nugent
J. T. farmer wrote: Mike Jakubik wrote: Jonathan Noack wrote: The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't some put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est la vie. It's always a

Re: portsdb

2006-05-12 Thread gareth
On Wed 2006-05-10 (11:29), Jonathan Noack wrote: You are probably experiencing some of the VFS limitations in 5.3 (you'll be pleasantly surprised by 6.1!). portsdb -Uu is very CPU and IO intensive; it takes a long time on a fast machine. make fetchindex is provided as a replacement for

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-12 Thread Matthias Andree
Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jonathan Noack wrote: The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't some put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est la vie. It's always a

Jail testers needed (rc.d/jail)

2006-05-12 Thread Florent Thoumie
Hey lists, Two or three days before the CVS tree has been tagged for FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE, I've committed a broken version of the jail rc.d script. The symptoms are: - an ifconfig error message if you don't define a jail_interface and have at least one jail configured, this one is harmless. - a

Re: Jail testers needed (rc.d/jail)

2006-05-12 Thread Karol Kwiatkowski
On 12/05/2006 11:21, Florent Thoumie wrote: Hey lists, Two or three days before the CVS tree has been tagged for FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE, I've committed a broken version of the jail rc.d script. The symptoms are: - an ifconfig error message if you don't define a jail_interface and have at

Re: portsdb

2006-05-12 Thread Jonathan Noack
On 05/12/06 03:20, gareth wrote: On Wed 2006-05-10 (11:29), Jonathan Noack wrote: You are probably experiencing some of the VFS limitations in 5.3 (you'll be pleasantly surprised by 6.1!). portsdb -Uu is very CPU and IO intensive; it takes a long time on a fast machine. make fetchindex is