Hello!
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
%Sys %Intr %Idl
RELENG_6 + rl0 45 40 15
RELENG_6 + fxp0 45 35 20
%Sys %Intr %Idl time md5 -t wall clock time
RELENG_6 + rl0 34 24 42 1:43
RELENG_6 + fxp0
Hello!
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
So maybe it's time to add, say,
options INVARIANTS_EXTENDED
for these new and expensive checks, and leave only basic and cheap (yet
effective for bug hunting) asserts enabled when only
options INVARIANTS
is defined?
No, they are
On 05/13/06 01:59, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
On Fri, 12 May 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
%Sys %Intr %Idl
RELENG_6 + rl0 45 40 15
RELENG_6 + fxp0 45 35 20
%Sys %Intr %Idl time md5 -t wall clock time
RELENG_6 + rl0 34
I have a test PC here which
is quite old (FreeBSD 4.mumble, Tcl 8.2) and it never
sees any problems. I am soon going to try an identical system
to the one failing (6.0-STABLE)
Have you checked if the PC's serial port adheres to RS232 specs?
--
FreeBSD Developer,
On Saturday 13 May 2006 19:15, Joseph Koshy wrote:
I have a test PC here which
is quite old (FreeBSD 4.mumble, Tcl 8.2) and it never
sees any problems. I am soon going to try an identical system
to the one failing (6.0-STABLE)
Have you checked if the PC's serial port adheres to RS232
Boris Samorodov wrote on Thu, 11 May 2006 09:46:
On Thu, 11 May 2006 01:28:29 +0200 Jakob Breivik Grimstveit wrote:
Here is a transcript of what is shown on-screen before crash appears:
nvidia0: GeForce 6800 mem
0xfa00-0xfaff,0xe800-oxeff,0xfb00-0xfbff irq
16 at
I just installed FreeBSD 6.1 and had no problems during the basic
installation. I did a Custom install and seleced All in the
Choose Distributions menu.
When I attempt to run a program compiled on release 5.4 under
release 6.1, the system complains that it cannot find libc.so.5.
On my release
Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
Can you give the output of top(1)? Until this is fixed, you can disable
pagezero with sysctl vm.idlezero_enable=0.
It's weekend so the load is not that great today:
last pid: 39200; load averages: 0.94, 1.07, 1.06up 3+19:07:24
13:55:38
131 processes: 4
Hello,
I've recently became an owner of Xircom 16-bit PCMCIA 10/100 Ethernet Card,
which gets picked up by FreeBSD-6.1 as xe0 by the if_xe(4) driver. Here is a
line from dmesg:
snip
xe0: Xircom CreditCard Ethernet 10/100 at port 0xd040-0xd04f iomem
0xff904000-0xff904fff irq 11 function 0
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 03:01:18AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Jonathan Noack, and lo! it spake thus:
Have you tried putting I586_CPU in there? See
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-December/020696.html.
As Peter Jeremy mentioned in
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 02:13:08PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to talk to a high voltage power supply unit we're using at work,
it uses RS232 and you can read back current, voltage, faults, etc..
What I have seems to work fine except that occassionally I get junk read back,
On Saturday 13 May 2006 20:59, Dan Strick wrote:
When I attempt to run a program compiled on release 5.4 under
release 6.1, the system complains that it cannot find libc.so.5.
On my release 5.4 system, /usr/lib/compat contains old shared
libraries. On my release 6.1 system, /usr/lib/compat
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08:59:01AM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
I'm just trying to understand why performance of RELENG_6 is worse than
in RELENG_4 _that much_, and whether this sad situation can be improved
somehow.
The architecture of the system substantially changed in the 5.X
Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
39 root1 -44 -163 0K 8K pgzero 1 772:59 18.41%
pagezero
It looks like the pagezero thread has a wrong priority. It should be 171
. I guess there's a bug in
Sam Leffler wrote:
Maybe this is the same problem jhb recently fixed in head with threads
getting assigned the wrong priority under certain conditions (it showed
up most easily with taskq threads).
Is it this one:
jhb 2006-04-17 18:20:38 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 10:37:40AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Kris Kennaway, and lo! it spake thus:
With respect to INVARIANTS, you just need to get used to the fact
that running thousands of checks for bugs is incompatible with
running at optimal speed.
(I'm not sure what the point of
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 10:52:32AM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 10:37:40AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Kris Kennaway, and lo! it spake thus:
With respect to INVARIANTS, you just need to get used to the fact
that running thousands of checks for bugs is
Hi Mateusz,
On Sat, May 13, 2006 2:04 pm, Mateusz JÄdrasik wrote:
I've recently became an owner of Xircom 16-bit PCMCIA 10/100 Ethernet
Card,
which gets picked up by FreeBSD-6.1 as xe0 by the if_xe(4) driver. Here is
a
line from dmesg:
snip
xe0: Xircom CreditCard Ethernet 10/100 at port
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 11:58:26AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Kris Kennaway, and lo! it spake thus:
FYI, INVARIANTS adds checks but does not (is not supposed to) divert
code paths.
It does at least in UMA; it does a lot of bzero()/NULL'ing out of
memory, which might hide later
I just noticed these messages in my security log on one of my production
servers, running 6.1. Can anyone shed some light as to what is going on
here? This is a dual core opteron system, on a tyan mb, with a nvidia
chipset. The filesystem is on the nvidia raid1 controller.
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE
On 5/13/06, Paul Schenkeveld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
When I try to copy a large (7GB+) file from one filesystem to another the
copy is not equal to te source file. This behaviour can be reproduced
repeatedly.
Details:
- FreeBSD 6-STABLE, cvsupped yesterday
Hi!
I have very
Jared wrote:
Hi -stable!
I'd like to bring something to the attention of -stable that was posted
to -amd64 but has not yet being resolved:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=amd64/95554
I'm unable to test to see if this occurs on i386 aswell so am unsure if
this is the right list
go to the web site http://geocities.com/MeeabelKyleGui/
beside them on to sharp rocks below; but each of them took a good coil
of rope wound tight about his waist, and so at last without mishap they
reached the little grassy bay. There they made their third camp, hauling
up what they
On Fri, 5 May 2006 05:33 pm, Paul Koch wrote:
Hi,
I have just upgraded some of our product build machines to 6.1RC2 and
I am having a few problems getting a custom install.cfg to work with
the way sysinstall now selects/installs kernels. I am trying to
select a custom distribution set using
I have been having repeated filesystem corruption issues on 5.4 and 5.5-beta4.
The problems only occur on disks connected to the VIA 82C596B UDMA66
controller. There have been no problems at all with the HighPoint controller.
The problems only occur under heavy load with lots of reads and
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08:33:38PM +0300, Matti J. Karki wrote:
On 5/13/06, Paul Schenkeveld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
When I try to copy a large (7GB+) file from one filesystem to another the
copy is not equal to te source file. This behaviour can be reproduced
repeatedly.
Rostislav Krasny wrote:
Hi,
May 13 03:01:29 ns1 kernel: DOH! ata_alloc_composite failed!
May 13 03:01:29 ns1 last message repeated 2 times
I'm not a FreeBSD developer but after looking at the source code I can
say that that kernel message goes from src/sys/dev/ata/ata-raid.c
because
[I may have missed some responses to my original posting because the
current set of postings has been cleaned out but not yet installed
in the mailing list archive.]
I just installed FreeBSD 6.1, selecting All in the distributions
selection menu, and discovered that the compat* distributions are
Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 19:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dan Strick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[I may have missed some responses to my original posting because the
current set of postings has been cleaned out but not yet installed
in the mailing list archive.]
I just installed
On Sunday 14 May 2006 12:10, Dan Strick wrote:
Is this the official work-around? I see that there are also compat4x
and compat3x ports in /usr/ports/misc. Is 1x, 20, 21, and 22
compatibility support gone forever? (Not that I would miss it. I only
need 4x and 5x compatibility.)
It isn't a
30 matches
Mail list logo
