Re: why the swapping

2006-05-19 Thread Tim Middleton
Thanks for the tips, all who responded (including a few who responded via email-only --- Kris, thanks for not just calling me an idiot outright. -; BTW, thanks for your BSDCan presentation ... really motivated me to try to get the 5.x boxes I have in production upgraded! I'll say no more...).

possible tcp problem

2006-05-19 Thread Andras Got
Hi, I'm using freebsd 6.1 and _sometimes_ (one for every ~30-40 minutes) I get mysql connect errors with permission denied. The mysql_connect returns error code 1, which is permission denied. The same happed to me when i tried to open a tcp connection between jails and it wasn't mysql

5.4=6.1 regression: nforce2 vs. APIC [+fix]

2006-05-19 Thread Andriy Gapon
[Disclaimer, just in case: I do mean APIC, not ACPI] This is a good lesson for me for not trying any RCs or BETAs in due time. Short description of my system: nforce2 based motherboard NF-7 v2 with the latest BIOS (v2.7), CPU is Athlon XP. After upgrading from 5.4 to 6.1 I started to

Re: 5.4=6.1 regression: nforce2 vs. APIC [+fix]

2006-05-19 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
Andriy Gapon wrote: [Disclaimer, just in case: I do mean APIC, not ACPI] Based on that info and the linux patch in that thread I came up with the following PCI fixup. Now I am running 6.1 with both APIC and C1 disconnect enabled for 2 days without any problems. Did you file a PR with

Re: 5.4=6.1 regression: nforce2 vs. APIC [+fix]

2006-05-19 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday 19 May 2006 10:27, Andriy Gapon wrote: [Disclaimer, just in case: I do mean APIC, not ACPI] This is a good lesson for me for not trying any RCs or BETAs in due time. Short description of my system: nforce2 based motherboard NF-7 v2 with the latest BIOS (v2.7), CPU is Athlon XP.

Re: 5.4=6.1 regression: nforce2 vs. APIC [+fix]

2006-05-19 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 19/05/2006 18:16 John Baldwin said the following: On Friday 19 May 2006 10:27, Andriy Gapon wrote: [Disclaimer, just in case: I do mean APIC, not ACPI] This is a good lesson for me for not trying any RCs or BETAs in due time. Short description of my system: nforce2 based motherboard NF-7

Re: 5.4=6.1 regression: nforce2 vs. APIC [+fix]

2006-05-19 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 19/05/2006 17:54 [LoN]Kamikaze said the following: Andriy Gapon wrote: [Disclaimer, just in case: I do mean APIC, not ACPI] Based on that info and the linux patch in that thread I came up with the following PCI fixup. Now I am running 6.1 with both APIC and C1 disconnect enabled for 2

ipw(4) breaking under load

2006-05-19 Thread Ulrich Spoerlein
Hi guys, is it just me, or is no one actually using ipw(4) under 6.1? Anyway, I set up a FreeBSD based AP using an ural(4) device. I'm connecting to it via laptop and ipw(4). This works fine, as long as you don't push it. Transferring some files via NFS gives me a lousy 100kB/s transfer rate,

Re: ipw(4) breaking under load

2006-05-19 Thread Patrick Lamaizière
Le Vendredi 19 Mai 2006 18:27, Ulrich Spoerlein a écrit : Hi guys, Hello, is it just me, or is no one actually using ipw(4) under 6.1? Anyway, I set up a FreeBSD based AP using an ural(4) device. I'm connecting to it via laptop and ipw(4). This works fine, as long as you don't push it.

Re: 4.11 snapshots?

2006-05-19 Thread Seth Kingry
You could build your own snapshots It's not hard (hint 'man release'). Seth Brett Glass wrote: Is there a server currently furnishing snapshots of the FreeBSD 4.11 security branch? We have some servers running various 4.x versions that might not be happy with 6.x due to memory

Re: possible tcp problem

2006-05-19 Thread Rostislav Krasny
Hi, On Fri, 19 May 2006 15:49:25 +0200 Andras Got [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The question is that what could cause this thing and what should we try to solve this. Errors: sendmail[37085]: gethostbyaddr(IP) failed: 1 Can't connect to MySQL server on 'IP' (1) Don't know about the second