On 2007-01-17, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 January 2007 at 3:16:44 +0100, Roland Smith wrote:
Personally I like tabbed browsing a lot, but different strokes for
different folks.
It probably depends on your window manager. Tabs are a reasonable
workaround for window
Ken Smith wrote:
The FreeBSD Release Engineering Team is pleased to announce the availability
of FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE. This release continues the development of the
6-STABLE branch providing performance and stability improvements, many
bug fixes and new features. Some of the highlights:
* Colin Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12.01.2007 06:53]:
Hello Everyone,
I usually let security advisories speak for themselves, but I want to call
special attention to this one: If you use jails, READ THE ADVISORY, in
particular the NOTE WELL part below; and if you have problems after
Hi,
in my previous mail (message ID [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) I
described problems with ACPI on my HP Compaq nx6325 with freeBSD 6.1
release.
Meanwhile I have freeBSD 6.2 stable (of yesterday), but ACPI still
doesn't work. Booting with ACPI enabled results in the the system being
unresponsive,
A poll for opinions if I may?
I've got a few gmirrors running on various machines, all of which
pair up two drives at the physical level (i.e. mirror /dev/ad0s1
with /dev/ad1s1). Of course there are other ways of doing it to,
like mirroring at the partition level, ie pairing /dev/ad0s1a with
On 1/17/07, Josef Karthauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A poll for opinions if I may?
I've got a few gmirrors running on various machines, all of which
pair up two drives at the physical level (i.e. mirror /dev/ad0s1
with /dev/ad1s1). Of course there are other ways of doing it to,
like mirroring
Hi there!
I am looking for a solution for a small problem regarding a high
availability setup.
I am running heartbeat on a STABLE-system, the failover works fine for
IP-adresses and I am able to see that a
'/usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server start' statement is issued. BUT since
the variables for
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:47:37 +0100
Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there!
I am looking for a solution for a small problem regarding a high
availability setup.
I am running heartbeat on a STABLE-system, the failover works fine for
IP-adresses and I am able to see that a
Apart from potentially avoiding a whole disk from being copied
during a resync after a crash, are there any other advantages to
using partition level mirroring instead of drive level mirroring?
Joe,
Partition-level software RAID plus LVM is how the following Slashdot
poster manages extendable
Hello,
just modify the /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server script.
Cheers, -vlado
Richard píše v st 17. 01. 2007 v 13:47 +0100:
Hi there!
I am looking for a solution for a small problem regarding a high
availability setup.
I am running heartbeat on a STABLE-system, the failover works fine for
In response to Vladimir Botka [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Richard píše v st 17. 01. 2007 v 13:47 +0100:
Hi there!
I am looking for a solution for a small problem regarding a high
availability setup.
I am running heartbeat on a STABLE-system, the failover works fine for
IP-adresses and I am
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Or waiting until the snapshot operation finishes. You (still) haven't
determined that it's actually hanging as opposed to just waiting for
the snapshot operation to finish.
Just upgraded to 6.2-STABLE, and I must say that things are a LOT better:
- It did return a
Am Mittwoch, den 17.01.2007, 13:16 + schrieb Dominic Marks:
setup.
I am running heartbeat on a STABLE-system, the failover works fine for
IP-adresses and I am able to see that a
'/usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server start' statement is issued. BUT since
the variables for mysql are not set
On 1/17/07, Matthew X. Economou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apart from potentially avoiding a whole disk from being copied
during a resync after a crash, are there any other advantages to
using partition level mirroring instead of drive level mirroring?
Joe,
Partition-level software RAID plus
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:47:43 +0100
Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 17.01.2007, 13:16 + schrieb Dominic Marks:
setup.
I am running heartbeat on a STABLE-system, the failover works fine for
IP-adresses and I am able to see that a
'/usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server
Am Mittwoch, den 17.01.2007, 17:47 +0400 schrieb Rauf Kuliyev:
Try '/usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server forcestart'
.
I am running heartbeat on a STABLE-system, the failover works fine for
IP-adresses and I am able to see that a
'/usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server start' statement is issued.
Try '/usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server forcestart'
On 1/17/07, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there!
I am looking for a solution for a small problem regarding a high
availability setup.
I am running heartbeat on a STABLE-system, the failover works fine for
IP-adresses and I am able to see
Hi!
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 01:47:37PM +0100, Richard wrote:
I am running heartbeat on a STABLE-system, the failover works fine for
IP-adresses and I am able to see that a
Why you ignore carp(4) and ports/net/ifstated?
'/usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server start' statement is issued. BUT since
Am Mittwoch, den 17.01.2007, 14:04 + schrieb Dominic Marks:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:47:43 +0100
Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 17.01.2007, 13:16 + schrieb Dominic Marks:
setup.
I am running heartbeat on a STABLE-system, the failover works fine for
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:20:32 +0100
Richard Verwayen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 17.01.2007, 14:04 + schrieb Dominic Marks:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:47:43 +0100
Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 17.01.2007, 13:16 + schrieb Dominic Marks:
setup.
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 14:47, Richard wrote:
Hi there!
I am looking for a solution for a small problem regarding a high
availability setup.
I am running heartbeat on a STABLE-system, the failover works fine for
IP-adresses and I am able to see that a
'/usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server
Am Mittwoch, den 17.01.2007, 17:25 +0300 schrieb Dmitriy Kirhlarov:
Hi!
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 01:47:37PM +0100, Richard wrote:
I am running heartbeat on a STABLE-system, the failover works fine for
IP-adresses and I am able to see that a
Why you ignore carp(4) and
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 23:51, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 05:13:16AM +0100, Par Leijonhufvud wrote:
I have a FreeBSD box (running ancient 4.8) that used to collect email
fine with fetchmail. Then after te latest portupgrade of fetchmail it
stopped working. When trying
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 03:10:29PM +0100, Richard wrote:
Try '/usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server forcestart'
Hm, that's only a temporary solution.
As a background:
Heartbeat monitors the HA nodes via a UDP ping (or other method) and if
one of the nodes goes down, it takes over a
Hi Nikos!
Am Mittwoch, den 17.01.2007, 16:08 +0200 schrieb Nikos Vassiliadis:
I am running heartbeat on a STABLE-system, the failover works fine for
IP-adresses and I am able to see that a
'/usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server start' statement is issued. BUT since
the variables for mysql are
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 03:20:32PM +0100, Richard Verwayen wrote:
Oh, should I have mentioned that it is a shared SCSI-Storage in between?
You can use gmirror(8) with ggated(8).
By.
Dmitriy
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 06:29, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 1/17/07, Josef Karthauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A poll for opinions if I may?
I've got a few gmirrors running on various machines, all of which
pair up two drives at the physical level (i.e. mirror /dev/ad0s1
with
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 01:51, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 06:24:23 +0100
Par Leijonhufvud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I tell portupgrade that I *know*, just go ahead anyway?
Is it 'portupgrade -f portname' you want?
There's always the traditional
cd
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 8:37 AM
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Failover-HA-Setup
Am Mittwoch, den 17.01.2007, 17:25 +0300 schrieb Dmitriy Kirhlarov:
Hi!
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 01:47:37PM
In the cvs repository, there has appeared src/lib/ncurses, which seems
to be a copy of lib/libncurses. Is this meant to be?
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
In the cvs repository, there has appeared src/lib/ncurses, which seems
to be a copy of lib/libncurses. Is this meant to be?
Yes, this is a repo-copy in preparation of ncurses update.
BTW. I think the files appeared on -HEAD, no?
Cheers,
--
Xin LI [EMAIL
On 1/18/07, Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the cvs repository, there has appeared src/lib/ncurses, which seems
to be a copy of lib/libncurses. Is this meant to be?
Yes. it's for the upcoming ncurses update, which will occur within one week.
I'm waiting the current exp
Hello!
I am having a VERY weird problem.
The pc config is:
1) Celeron 1+ GHZ
2) Intel PCI ethernet nic
3) Fasttrak TX2000 raid + 2 mirrored disks (seagate 80gb)
4) teac dvd driver
5) 512 MB ram
6) Chaintech montherboard (old one)
also tried on gigabyte motherboard
I insert boot cd and when
Hi all.
I seem to have screwed up my ports nicely. I have two versions of the
same php modules
installed. GAH!
php5-session-5.1.6_3 The session shared extension for php
php5-session-5.2.0 The session shared extension for php
php5-shmop-5.1.6_3 The shmop shared extension for php
Matthew Herzog wrote:
Hi all.
I seem to have screwed up my ports nicely. I have two versions of the
same php modules
installed. GAH!
php5-session-5.1.6_3 The session shared extension for php
php5-session-5.2.0 The session shared extension for php
php5-shmop-5.1.6_3 The shmop shared
On 1/17/07, Matthew Herzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
I seem to have screwed up my ports nicely. I have two versions of the
same php modules
installed. GAH!
php5-session-5.1.6_3 The session shared extension for php
php5-session-5.2.0 The session shared extension for php
Matthew Herzog wrote:
Hi all.
I seem to have screwed up my ports nicely. I have two versions of the
same php modules
installed. GAH!
php5-session-5.1.6_3 The session shared extension for php
php5-session-5.2.0 The session shared extension for php
php5-shmop-5.1.6_3 The shmop shared
Please don't post replies to messages on the freebsd lists above the
message. While that's common in other circles (especially the business
world) it's not how we do things here.
Rauf Kuliyev wrote:
Try '/usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server forcestart'
If your intention is to start a service
Bill Milford wrote:
You can modify the keyword section of the
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server(.sh) and add nostart This
allows you to start it manually with
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/mysql-server start, but it will not start at
boot time as rcorder skips files with the nostart keyword. The
Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 03:20:32PM +0100, Richard Verwayen wrote:
Oh, should I have mentioned that it is a shared SCSI-Storage in between?
You can use gmirror(8) with ggated(8).
I think his problem is that you can't have two machines RW mounting the
same device
Richard wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 17.01.2007, 16:08 +0200 schrieb Nikos Vassiliadis:
I remember that heartbeat can call any script you it tell to.
So, you have to let heartbeat start MySQL. rc will just start
heartbeat.
Yes, you are right, and exactly that was my problem. It didn't start.
Hi,
I have the following options in /etc/make.conf:
NO_PROFILE=true
NO_SENDMAIL=true
NO_GAMES=true
NO_I4B=true
NO_ATM=true
NO_INET6=true
NO_BLUETOOTH=true
NO_IPFILTER=true
NO_RCMDS=true
NO_KERBEROS=true
However after a make buildworld installworld the utilities and libs
associated with these
Tom Judge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I have the following options in /etc/make.conf:
NO_PROFILE=true
NO_SENDMAIL=true
NO_GAMES=true
NO_I4B=true
NO_ATM=true
NO_INET6=true
NO_BLUETOOTH=true
NO_IPFILTER=true
NO_RCMDS=true
NO_KERBEROS=true
However after a make buildworld
Jack Vogel wrote:
On 1/16/07, Mike Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a strange issue with em0 watchdog timeouts that I think is not the
same as the ones everyone was having during the 6.2 beta cycle...
I have six systems, each with two Intel GigE ports onboard:
Systems A and B:
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 22:07, Jack Vogel wrote:
On 1/16/07, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:53:04AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
There are some management related issues with this NIC, first if you
have not done so make a DOS bootable device, and run
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 13:52, Victor Snezhko wrote:
Tom Judge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I have the following options in /etc/make.conf:
NO_PROFILE=true
NO_SENDMAIL=true
NO_GAMES=true
NO_I4B=true
NO_ATM=true
NO_INET6=true
NO_BLUETOOTH=true
NO_IPFILTER=true
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 14:29, John Nielsen wrote:
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 13:52, Victor Snezhko wrote:
Tom Judge [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I have the following options in /etc/make.conf:
NO_PROFILE=true
NO_SENDMAIL=true
NO_GAMES=true
NO_I4B=true
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 10:20 am, Tom Judge wrote:
I have the following options in /etc/make.conf:
NO_PROFILE=true
NO_SENDMAIL=true
NO_GAMES=true
NO_I4B=true
NO_ATM=true
NO_INET6=true
NO_BLUETOOTH=true
NO_IPFILTER=true
NO_RCMDS=true
NO_KERBEROS=true
However after a make
Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
I have the following options in /etc/make.conf:
NO_PROFILE=true
NO_SENDMAIL=true
NO_GAMES=true
NO_I4B=true
NO_ATM=true
NO_INET6=true
NO_BLUETOOTH=true
NO_IPFILTER=true
NO_RCMDS=true
NO_KERBEROS=true
However after a make buildworld installworld the
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 02:48:18PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Or waiting until the snapshot operation finishes. You (still) haven't
determined that it's actually hanging as opposed to just waiting for
the snapshot operation to finish.
Just upgraded to
Since this was just seen, and the patch below validated as working I wanted
to send general email to capture this:
The Lenovo X60 can have issues with long ping times, this is a KNOWN
hardware problem, and Intel is working with IBM/Lenovo, a final 'fix' has
not been decided on yet. Nevertheless,
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 02:48:18PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Or waiting until the snapshot operation finishes. You (still) haven't
determined that it's actually hanging as opposed to just waiting for
the snapshot operation to finish.
Just
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 1/17/07, Josef Karthauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A poll for opinions if I may?
I've got a few gmirrors running on various machines, all of which
pair up two drives at the physical level (i.e. mirror /dev/ad0s1
with /dev/ad1s1). Of course there are other ways of
Ivan Voras wrote:
Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 03:20:32PM +0100, Richard Verwayen wrote:
Oh, should I have mentioned that it is a shared SCSI-Storage in between?
You can use gmirror(8) with ggated(8).
I think his problem is that you can't have two machines RW mounting
I'd like to know, are documentation iso files for amd64 and i386 arch
exactly the same? MD5 is different. I have the one for i386. Should I
get also for amd64 and use it for 64 bit box? In other words, are they
arch specific?
Best regards
Zoran
On 1/18/07, Scott Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 1/17/07, Josef Karthauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A poll for opinions if I may?
I've got a few gmirrors running on various machines, all of which
pair up two drives at the physical level (i.e. mirror /dev/ad0s1
- Mark Saad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 03:20:32PM +0100, Richard Verwayen wrote:
Oh, should I have mentioned that it is a shared SCSI-Storage in
between?
You can use gmirror(8) with ggated(8).
I think his
If memory serves me right, Zoran Kolic wrote:
I'd like to know, are documentation iso files for amd64 and i386 arch
exactly the same? MD5 is different. I have the one for i386. Should I
get also for amd64 and use it for 64 bit box? In other words, are they
arch specific?
The content is
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:47:37 +0100
From: Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Failover-HA-Setup
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Hi there!
I am looking for a solution for a small problem regarding a high
availability setup.
I am
On 17/01/07, Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...after reading the slashdotter's piece of wisdom...]
Yes, but that's the kind of functionality I have always
expected to be present in software raid solutions. I
hope I'll live to see this implemented in geom.
That made my eyes
I've found word 'installathon' in share/dict/freebsd dictionary. Is it
error?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 06:22:31AM +0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found word 'installathon' in share/dict/freebsd dictionary. Is it
error?
No, this is a dictionary of freebsd-related jargon. An installathon
is an advocacy event where the aim is to install FreeBSD on many
computers.
I've found word 'installathon' share/dict/freebsd dictionary. Is it error?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've found word 'installathon' share/dict/freebsd dictionary. Is it error?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 17/01/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] suggested:
I've found word 'installathon' share/dict/freebsd dictionary. Is it error?
If you really think so, I suppose
you could remove it, though it
would tend to pop back up with
every installworld
Assuming
You do not make some kind of mad
Hi,
I have a patch here to MFC the rstp code to RELENG_6. It should be all
fine and dandy as for API but will cause the default spanning tree
version to change from stp to rstp.
Is it ok to change the protocol version for the STABLE users (rstp is
backwards compatable with stp) or should it
Torfinn Ingolfsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.01.17] wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 06:24:23 +0100
Par Leijonhufvud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I tell portupgrade that I *know*, just go ahead anyway?
Is it 'portupgrade -f portname' you want?
Nope, that does not do it, what it did was remove
67 matches
Mail list logo
