Hi Tom,
I don't know how much documentation there is on this, but if you are
investigating this issue, maybe you would like to contribute/update
some documentation on it?
Royce gave me a link to the tools,
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/projects/freebsd-update-server/
reading
I asked this question a while ago, but got no answers. I'm trying again
Is there any possibility that heimdal 1.1 that works beautifully in
Current will be backported to FreeBSD-7.x?
Gunnar Flygt
Sveriges Radio Teknik/IT
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
If you have BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER compiled into the kernel, then try pressing
ctrl-alt-break on the console to see if you can drop into the debugger, or
issue a serial break on a serial console.
Well, I added BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER to the kernel config I had which contained
all the other stuff
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Pete French wrote:
If you have BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER compiled into the kernel, then try pressing
ctrl-alt-break on the console to see if you can drop into the debugger, or
issue a serial break on a serial console.
Well, I added BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER to the kernel config I had
effect on control flow, unlike, say, WITNESS, which significantly distorts
timing. Is there any chance you picked up any of the recent fixes that went
into RELENG_7 without noticing, and that perhaps one of those did it? With
I'm pretty certian of that - I hav just been changing kernel
Walter Venable pisze:
FreeBSD 7.1 upgrade broke my network access, machine is totally
offline (powered-on and I can play inside it at the terminal, but
absolutely 0 network access):
This happened AFTER make kernel but BEFORE make installworld. I think
this implies it's a kernel driver issue.
Hello all.
I have a 4.11 Stable version that has been working without problems
in the last years. We do not need nothing else for the moment but we
are looking to have more speed. It has been running under a double
Pentium III processor with 512MB of ram and it has a disk of 40GB.
I was
Hello,
Finally I found what is the problem.
from ACPI CA release notes:
...
14 May 2008. Summary of changes for version 20080514:
1) ACPI CA Core Subsystem:
Fixed a problem where GPEs were enabled too early during the ACPICA
initialization. This could lead to handler not installed errors on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ooops, sorry sleep() prevents loading of acpi module!
Krassimir Slavchev wrote:
Hello,
Finally I found what is the problem.
from ACPI CA release notes:
...
14 May 2008. Summary of changes for version 20080514:
1) ACPI CA Core Subsystem:
on 14/01/2009 16:34 Jorge Biquez said the following:
b) If is possible to clone the same installation to a new faster disk
(like a sata 250GB). I know I can install a /.x version and for sure
will work but here the idea is to have things running as usual without
problems. This installation is
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 06:39:53PM +0200, Omer Faruk Sen wrote:
Hi,
I am having kernel dump with FreeBSD 7.1:
Here is crashinfo output of it (Actually i don't know the state of
crashinfo in Fbsd 7.1)
7.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE #0: Thu Jan 1 08:58:24 UTC 2009
a) Only put the disk in a new machine at least a double core with 2GB
of RAM. My guess is that could boot with a few problems on
hardware what do you think?
That should work fine - I have moved discs between machines with no
problems.
b) If is possible to clone the same installation to
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 05:28:45PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 14/01/2009 16:34 Jorge Biquez said the following:
b) If is possible to clone the same installation to a new faster disk
(like a sata 250GB). I know I can install a /.x version and for sure
will work but here the idea is to
At 09:34 AM 1/14/2009, Jorge Biquez wrote:
Hello all.
I have a 4.11 Stable version that has been working without problems
in the last years. We do not need nothing else for the moment but we
are looking to have more speed. It has been running under a double
Pentium III processor with 512MB
my problem in with others under the asusmption that it's all the same. This
is onbiously pretty rare - out of 24 of the HP servers the problems only crops
up on 4 of them. But there is nothing dfferent about those 4.
Could it be different bios/firmware on the hp-servers?
Mr. Aliyev was unable
Hi,
I tried to mount root slice using the device nodes provided in /dev/ufs
directory. It works fine for other slices but not for the root slice. If I
try it I get prompt asking for root slice at boot time. It this not possible
at all or am I doing something wrong?
--
VH
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 19:00 +0100, Václav Haisman wrote:
Hi,
I tried to mount root slice using the device nodes provided in /dev/ufs
directory. It works fine for other slices but not for the root slice. If I
try it I get prompt asking for root slice at boot time. It this not possible
at all
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Ganbold ganb...@micom.mng.net wrote:
Ganbold wrote:
Harald Servat wrote:
Hello,
I downloaded FreeBSD 7.1 (DVD iso image) for amd64 architecture (with
correct SHA256 checksum), but I'm unable to start the system (Lenovo
T400).
The boot process starts
Frank Mayhar wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 19:00 +0100, Václav Haisman wrote:
Hi,
I tried to mount root slice using the device nodes provided in /dev/ufs
directory. It works fine for other slices but not for the root slice. If I
try it I get prompt asking for root slice at boot time. It this
Hello,
I am trying the new FIB stuff on -STABLE with IPFW, I made many tests
and it did not work as I expected.
Quick testing:
# lynx -dump http://www.whatismyip.org
200.165.75.10
# setfib -1 lynx -dump http://www.whatismyip.org
189.52.141.2
# setfib -2 lynx -dump http://www.whatismyip.org
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Václav Haisman v.hais...@sh.cvut.cz wrote:
Hi,
I tried to mount root slice using the device nodes provided in /dev/ufs
directory. It works fine for other slices but not for the root slice. If I
try it I get prompt asking for root slice at boot time. It this not
Dan Langille wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting this:
kernel: interrupt storm detected on irq22:; throttling interrupt source
Interesting how they sometimes span lines:
Jan 14 21:16:24 polo kernel: interrup
Jan 14 21:16:24 polo kernel: t storm detected on irq22:; thr
Jan 14 21:16:24 polo kernel:
Dan Langille wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting this:
kernel: interrupt storm detected on irq22:; throttling interrupt source
Interesting how they sometimes span lines:
Jan 14 21:16:24 polo kernel: interrup
Jan 14 21:16:24 polo kernel: t storm detected on irq22:; thr
Jan 14
Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting this:
kernel: interrupt storm detected on irq22:; throttling interrupt
source
Interesting how they sometimes span lines:
Jan 14 21:16:24 polo kernel: interrup
Jan 14 21:16:24 polo kernel: t storm detected on
From /var/log/messages:
starting BIND 9.4.3-P1 -t /var/named -u bind
could not get query source dispatcher (0.0.0.0#53)
loading configuration: address in use
exiting (due to fatal error)
I had just updated from 5-stable (at 5.5) to 6-stable (at 6.4). Upon
today's upgrade I got to 7.1.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 08:11:27PM -0800, Mike Lempriere wrote:
From /var/log/messages:
starting BIND 9.4.3-P1 -t /var/named -u bind
could not get query source dispatcher (0.0.0.0#53)
loading configuration: address in use
exiting (due to fatal error)
I had just updated from 5-stable (at
Dan Langille wrote:
Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting this:
kernel: interrupt storm detected on irq22:; throttling interrupt
source
what is your motherboard brand? I have the same issue with interrupt
storms, as stated in [1] and I think that
Mike Lempriere wrote:
loading configuration: address in use
This error generally means that the old named is still running. Try
'rndc stop', and then do 'ps -ax | grep named'. If you still see
something running do '/etc/rc.d/named stop' check ps again, then when
you're sure no other named is
Hello Marat, Dan,
I suppose you guys are running amd64? Could you try i386? AFAIR the
interrupt storms have gone away after I moved my MSI machine to i386
on an affected box.
--
Best regards,
Danielmailto:dan...@freebsd.org
Harald Servat wrote:
However, let me tell you what I've found now (I tried these options in the
following order).
**
a) I've started with option 2 (ACPI disabled) because I read somewhere
that FreeBSD did not support Lenovo T400's ACPI.
The system boots and freezes after showing
30 matches
Mail list logo
