On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 08:58:12AM +0100, Gerrit K?hn wrote:
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:46:55 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote
about Re: fun with if_re:
PY Since you're using RTL8169SC it could be related with my commit
PY r180519(cvs rev 1.95.2.22). It seems that RTL8169SC does not
Hi,
I am using Ruby 1.8.6 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 287) on FreeBSD 7.0-
RELEASE-p7. I have some code that -among other things- parses XML
files and when it does in at least one case, it dumps core with the
following error msg:
-x-x-x-
/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/rexml/parent.rb:19: [BUG] object
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 18:42 +0100, Tomas Randa wrote:
Yes, I do portupgrade -Rrfia after upgrade of course.
I don`t think it is some new PHP bug, because my friend have same
problem with memory and he do not upgraded ports. But his box do not
free memory after apache reload, my yes
Any
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:28:04 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon pyu...@gmail.com wrote
about Re: fun with if_re:
PY I did build new nanobsd images with these patches meanwhile and will
PY start using them today. However, as it has worked without problems
PY for weeks with the buggy version before, I will not
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:05:46 +0100 Gerrit Kühn ger...@pmp.uni-hannover.de
wrote about Re: fun with if_re:
GK Sorry to be back so soon again, but I just noticed that I did in fact
GK not produce new images yesterday. :-)
GK Kernel build stopped with
[...]
Ignore me, my bad (downloaded the webpage
Kostik Belousov wrote:
Compile ddb into the kernel, and do ps from the ddb prompt. If there
are processes hung in the nbufkv state, then the patch below might
help.
The bonnie++ processes are in state newbuf and other hung processes
(bash, newly forked sshds, etc) appear to be in the ufs
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 11:26:58AM +, Matt Burke wrote:
Kostik Belousov wrote:
Compile ddb into the kernel, and do ps from the ddb prompt. If there
are processes hung in the nbufkv state, then the patch below might
help.
The bonnie++ processes are in state newbuf and other hung
Kostik Belousov wrote:
Compile ddb into the kernel, and do ps from the ddb prompt. If there
are processes hung in the nbufkv state, then the patch below might
help.
The bonnie++ processes are in state newbuf and other hung processes
(bash, newly forked sshds, etc) appear to be in the ufs
I have an NFS server and NFS client separated by a firewall. Both
servers are FreeBSD 7.1.
Server configuration:
nfs_server_enable=YES
nfs_server_flags=-t -n 4
rpcbind_enable=YES
mountd_flags=-r -p 737
mountd_enable=YES
The firewall allows tcp and udp to port 111, but only tcp to ports 2049
and
Hi John Birrell,
I am exploring DTrace on 7.1-STABLE FreeBSD amd64 and I found several
weird behaviors:
1) Not all kernel functions show up in fbt provider. Take isp(4) as example:
dtrace -l shows
static void isp_freeze_loopdown(ispsoftc_t *, int, char *);
___but not___
static
Hello,
I've created a new patch for all the pmc feature available on trunk
(02/05).
It has been tested on a core2duo in amd64 and i386 mode with success.
Feel free to test and give your feedback.
Thanks to Joseph Koshy for the hard work on pmc.
Patch is linked on the PmcTools wiki page:
As I don't own that server anymore, I'm afraid I can't tell you whether
it's working now. :(
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 10:31:47AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 06:37:53PM +0100, Henrik Friedrichsen wrote:
Hey.
I have had similar symptoms on a dedicated server with the
Forwarding to list because mail to ema...@freebsd.org bounced at the
location it is apparently being forwarded to so I'm not sure if it
was received. I'll add that the problem seems to follow a pattern where
it happens only twice after a reboot (usually in the morning when rsync runs)
and then
Chris H presented these words - circa 1/30/09 4:54 PM-
Hello Patrick, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Patrick Mahan ma...@mahan.org:
Chris H presented these words - circa 1/30/09 7:03 AM-
Hello Bruce, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Bruce M. Simpson b...@freebsd.org:
Chris
Hi,
on 2 different servers, running 7.1-stable + zfs, I get this
error rather frequently:
Feb 5 17:01:03 warhol-00 kernel: impossible packet length (543383918) from
nfs server sunfire:/dist
Feb 5 17:01:03 warhol-00 kernel: impossible packet length (1936028704) from
nfs server sunfire:/dist
On 2009-Feb-06 08:32:27 +0200, Danny Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il wrote:
on 2 different servers, running 7.1-stable + zfs, I get this
error rather frequently:
Feb 5 17:01:03 warhol-00 kernel: impossible packet length (543383918) from
nfs server sunfire:/dist
I gather warhol-00 is running
On 2009-Feb-06 08:32:27 +0200, Danny Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il wrote:
on 2 different servers, running 7.1-stable + zfs, I get this
error rather frequently:
Feb 5 17:01:03 warhol-00 kernel: impossible packet length (543383918) fro=
m=20
nfs server sunfire:/dist
So many quetsions :-)
17 matches
Mail list logo