I am wondering if the numbers I am seeing is something expected or is
something broken somewhere. Output of bonnie -s 1024:
on UFS2 + SoftUpdates:
---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block---
Hi--
On Jun 16, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Andrew Reilly wrote:
I bought a pair of identical WD 750G SATA drives the other day
and was surprised to discover that they were different sizes:
ad4: 715403MB WDC WD7500AACS-00D6B1 01.01A01 at ata2-master SATA150
ad6: 715404MB WDC WD7500AACS-00D6B1 01.01A01
Hello folks,
I need to upgrade the OpenSSH from the shiped 4.5p1 versions in 6.x and
7.x branches to 4.5p2 or higher(1).
I've updated the source tree in 6.3 and 7.0 RELENG boxes with a system
upgrade in mind, but the version is 4.5p1:
# cat /usr/src/crypto/openssh/version.h | grep -i
Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
I need to upgrade the OpenSSH from the shiped 4.5p1 versions in 6.x and
7.x branches to 4.5p2 or higher(1).
[...]
¿How can I upgrade the OpenSSH in the _same_ RELENG? ¿Maybe using the
ports?
portsnap fetch update
cd /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable/
make
* Erik Stian Tefre e...@tefre.com [2009-06-17 12:34]:
Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
¿How can I upgrade the OpenSSH in the _same_ RELENG? ¿Maybe using the
ports?
portsnap fetch update
cd /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable/
make install clean
/etc/rc.d/sshd stop
Set sshd_enable=NO in
Hi.
This is on 6.4-RELEASE-p5
Early in boot (probably due to network outage)::
Hit [Enter] to boot immediately, or any other key for command prompt.
Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel]...
/boot/kernel/acpi.ko text*0x44f40 |
readin failed
elf32*loadimage: read failed
GDB: no debug ports present
and
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 10:00:49 am Bruce Simpson wrote:
Vlad Galu wrote:
...
Thanks, Ivan. I'll take a better look at this after our first release,
which is due in a couple of weeks. Right now the team efforts aren't
focused on portability, so it's a low priority issue, but something
hail,
I have a 8-current using a small zfs pool:
[r...@harry ~]# zpool status
pool: zdados
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
zdados ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1ONLINE 0 0 0
ad8
On 2009-06-17 16:09, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
And for virtualbox on amd64 purposes I want to run 7.2R or STABLE to use
VT-x and amd64 vm's under vbox. will I have to make anything, or it will
just work ?
Kip Macy created a branch were there is the new zfs code, but I didn't get
it if it is in
On Wed, June 17, 2009 11:16, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2009-06-17 16:09, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
And for virtualbox on amd64 purposes I want to run 7.2R or STABLE to use
VT-x and amd64 vm's under vbox. will I have to make anything, or it will
just work ?
Kip Macy created a branch were there is
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 07:03:34PM +0400, pluknet wrote:
As for allpcpu, I often see the picture, when one CPU runs the irq17:
bce1 aacu0 thread
and another one runs arcconf. I wonder if that might be a source of
bad locking or races, or..
The arcconf utility uses ioctl that goes into
2009/6/17 Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 07:03:34PM +0400, pluknet wrote:
As for allpcpu, I often see the picture, when one CPU runs the irq17:
bce1 aacu0 thread
and another one runs arcconf. I wonder if that might be a source of
bad locking or races, or..
The arcconf
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Wed, June 17, 2009 11:16, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2009-06-17 16:09, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
And for virtualbox on amd64 purposes I want to run 7.2R or STABLE to use
VT-x and amd64 vm's under vbox. will I have to make anything, or it will
just work ?
Kip Macy created a
The difference in layout can easily explain a 2x difference in
sequential transfer performance.
I seriously doubt your disk is really getting 23K seeks/s done in the
UFS case - 100/s sounds much more reasonable for real hardware. Perhaps
the results of caching?
Joe Koberg
Dan Naumov
In the last episode (Jun 17), Dan Naumov said:
I am wondering if the numbers I am seeing is something expected or is
something broken somewhere. Output of bonnie -s 1024:
on UFS2 + SoftUpdates:
---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input--
--Random--
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 16:51 +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
thanks, I was just looking for this update on web interface to cvs and
there is nothing in UPDATING for RELENG_7 there. is this really supposed
to happen ?
Sadly a known and ignored problem of cvsweb
Gavin Atkinson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 16:51 +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
thanks, I was just looking for this update on web interface to cvs and
there is nothing in UPDATING for RELENG_7 there. is this really supposed
to happen ?
Sadly a known and ignored problem of
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:34:02 +0200, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am wondering if the numbers I am seeing is something expected or is
something broken somewhere. Output of bonnie -s 1024:
on UFS2 + SoftUpdates:
---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input--
All the ZFS tuning guides for FreeBSD (including one on the FreeBSD
ZFS wiki) have recommended values between 64M and 128M to improve
stability, so that what I went with. How much of my max kmem is it
safe to give to ZFS?
- Dan Naumov
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Ronald
19 matches
Mail list logo
