Re: zfs kernel panic

2009-09-09 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 18:44:13 +0200 Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote about Re: zfs kernel panic: PJD If this is amd64, add vm.kmem_size=4G to your loader.conf back. Yes, it is amd64 (sorry I did not mention that). I will add the option back (the one I used before was set to a somewhat

Re: zfs kernel panic

2009-09-09 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 18:44:13 +0200 Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote about Re: zfs kernel panic: PJD If this is amd64, add vm.kmem_size=4G to your loader.conf back. What about vm.kmem_size_max? Does that also need tuning? cu Gerrit ___

Re: Detecting CPU throttling on over temperature

2009-09-09 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Robert Noland wrote: On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 10:20 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Ian Smith wrote: Does anyone know if it is possible to determine if this is the case? ie is there a way to be informed if throttling has occurred? Might

Re: Detecting CPU throttling on over temperature

2009-09-09 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Alexander Motin wrote: Daniel O'Connor wrote: On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Alexander Motin wrote: Daniel O'Connor wrote: I recently discovered a system where the floppy drive cable was intermittently fouling the CPU fan - I believe this caused the CPU to overheat and then get

Re: zfs kernel panic

2009-09-09 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:07:15AM +0200, Gerrit Kühn wrote: On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 18:44:13 +0200 Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote about Re: zfs kernel panic: PJD If this is amd64, add vm.kmem_size=4G to your loader.conf back. What about vm.kmem_size_max? Does that also need tuning?

8.0-BETA2 on soekris discarding packets?

2009-09-09 Thread Ruben de Groot
Hi, I'm trying 8.0-BETA2 on a 4511 soekris board, but found a problem. Outgoing networking is fine, but it looks like incoming connections are silently discarded. No firewall is configured. Here's a tcpdump of normal outgoing DNS traffic (IP address of the soekris is 192.168.179.15): listening

Re: System crawls after Upgrade 7.0-7.2

2009-09-09 Thread Tobias Lott
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:19:45 +0200 Tobias Lott tl...@gamesnet.de wrote: Hey Everyone, I upgraded a Dual Core Machine to 7.2-Stable (2 Days ago), all OS related Stuff is located on an UFS Slice, Application is on a ZFS Volume. After the Upgrade everything seemed fine, but a User noticed

Re: zfs kernel panic

2009-09-09 Thread Danny Carroll
On 9/09/2009 6:33 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:07:15AM +0200, Gerrit Kühn wrote: On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 18:44:13 +0200 Pawel Jakub Dawidekp...@freebsd.org wrote about Re: zfs kernel panic: PJD If this is amd64, add vm.kmem_size=4G to your loader.conf back. What

Re: zfs kernel panic

2009-09-09 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 07:41:08PM +1000, Danny Carroll wrote: On 9/09/2009 6:33 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:07:15AM +0200, Gerrit Kühn wrote: On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 18:44:13 +0200 Pawel Jakub Dawidekp...@freebsd.org wrote about Re: zfs kernel panic: PJD If

Re: Upgrade FreeBSD 7.1 to 7.2

2009-09-09 Thread Michael Sperber
Robert Watson rwat...@freebsd.org writes: FWIW, the main problem I ran into with my 8.0 upgrade is that 8.0 uses the uart(4) driver for serial ports, and sio(4), 7.2's default, has been removed. They require mutually exclusive lines in device.hints and different /etc/ttys lines. If you rely

Re: Upgrade FreeBSD 7.1 to 7.2

2009-09-09 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2009-09-09 14:25, Michael Sperber wrote: If you rely on a serial console, I would recommend first switching 7.2 to using uart ... Could you briefly elaborate on how that's done with 7.x? I.e. is changing device.hints and /etc/ttys enough (what changes?), or do I need to recompile the

Re: Detecting CPU throttling on over temperature

2009-09-09 Thread Robert Noland
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 17:47 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Alexander Motin wrote: Daniel O'Connor wrote: On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Alexander Motin wrote: Daniel O'Connor wrote: I recently discovered a system where the floppy drive cable was intermittently fouling the

Re: Detecting CPU throttling on over temperature

2009-09-09 Thread Alexander Motin
Robert Noland wrote: On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 17:47 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Alexander Motin wrote: Daniel O'Connor wrote: On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Alexander Motin wrote: Daniel O'Connor wrote: I recently discovered a system where the floppy drive cable was intermittently

Re: Detecting CPU throttling on over temperature

2009-09-09 Thread Robert Noland
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 16:16 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: Robert Noland wrote: On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 17:47 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Alexander Motin wrote: Daniel O'Connor wrote: On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Alexander Motin wrote: Daniel O'Connor wrote: I recently

Re: Detecting CPU throttling on over temperature

2009-09-09 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! [on coretemp module, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:] AFAIR C2D supports three protection technologies. When CPU is hot, it starts reducing frequency (multiplier) and voltage, alike to IEST. If it is insufficient, it starts to skip core cycles, alike to TCC. If it is still

Re: Detecting CPU throttling on over temperature

2009-09-09 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 09/09/2009 18:38 Kurt Jaeger said the following: Hi! [on coretemp module, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:] AFAIR C2D supports three protection technologies. When CPU is hot, it starts reducing frequency (multiplier) and voltage, alike to IEST. If it is insufficient, it starts to

Re: ifconfig_ed0=DHCP does not work on 8.0-BETA3

2009-09-09 Thread Brooks Davis
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 01:06:35PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote: Le Ven 4 sep 09 ? 23:57:47 +0200, Brooks Davis bro...@freebsd.org ?crivait?: This is a know issue with some devices supported by ed(4). You can work around it by changing DHCP to SYNCDHCP which will cause dhclient to

Re: Detecting CPU throttling on over temperature

2009-09-09 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! Any information on what can be done with AMD CPUs with respect to temperature monitoring ? amdtemp(4) ? :-) home$ man amdtemp No manual entry for amdtemp It's on 8.0-BETA4, but I have no amd64 running with that, yet. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372

general protection fault on boot.

2009-09-09 Thread Vincent Hoffman
Hi all, I've been running the 8.0-BETAs in a xen virtual machine (hvm/fully virtualised) for testing and something between r196730 and r196746 causes a general protection fault on boot. I'll try and narrow it down if i get a chance but I'm a a bit busy at the moment. backtrace is

Re: System crawls after Upgrade 7.0-7.2

2009-09-09 Thread Clifton Royston
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:48:07AM +0200, Tobias Lott wrote: On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:19:45 +0200 Tobias Lott tl...@gamesnet.de wrote: Hey Everyone, I upgraded a Dual Core Machine to 7.2-Stable (2 Days ago), all OS related Stuff is located on an UFS Slice, Application is on a ZFS Volume.

Re: ifconfig_ed0=DHCP does not work on 8.0-BETA3

2009-09-09 Thread Thierry Thomas
Le Mer 9 sep 09 à 17:52:57 +0200, Brooks Davis bro...@freebsd.org écrivait : I'd rather not mention the link state changed message since I'd love to see it go away. How's this? Seems good, go! -- Th. Thomas. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing

Re: Detecting CPU throttling on over temperature

2009-09-09 Thread Thierry Thomas
Le Mar 8 sep 09 à 14:39:36 +0200, Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au écrivait : Hi, I recently discovered a system where the floppy drive cable was intermittently fouling the CPU fan - I believe this caused the CPU to overheat and then get throttled by the BIOS. Does anyone know if

Get 15% off the Vintage America Collection for Nine West by Donating to Soles4Souls

2009-09-09 Thread Soles4Souls and Nine West
Get 15% off the Vintage America Collection for Nine West by Donating to Soles4Souls ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: incorrect usleep/select delays with HZ 2500

2009-09-09 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 5:01:00 pm Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 01:08:23PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Sunday 06 September 2009 11:51:54 am Luigi Rizzo wrote: [Note 3] the TSC frequency is computed reading the tsc around a call to DELAY(100) and assuming

Re: general protection fault on boot.

2009-09-09 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 12:32:51 pm Vincent Hoffman wrote: Hi all, I've been running the 8.0-BETAs in a xen virtual machine (hvm/fully virtualised) for testing and something between r196730 and r196746 causes a general protection fault on boot. I'll try and narrow it down if

Re: general protection fault on boot.

2009-09-09 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 1:38:59 pm John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday 09 September 2009 12:32:51 pm Vincent Hoffman wrote: Hi all, I've been running the 8.0-BETAs in a xen virtual machine (hvm/fully virtualised) for testing and something between r196730 and r196746 causes a

Re: general protection fault on boot.

2009-09-09 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 01:38:59PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday 09 September 2009 12:32:51 pm Vincent Hoffman wrote: Hi all, I've been running the 8.0-BETAs in a xen virtual machine (hvm/fully virtualised) for testing and something between r196730 and r196746 causes a

Re: System crawls after Upgrade 7.0-7.2

2009-09-09 Thread Tobias Lott
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 07:02:13 -1000 Clifton Royston clift...@lava.net wrote: On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:48:07AM +0200, Tobias Lott wrote: On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:19:45 +0200 Tobias Lott tl...@gamesnet.de wrote: Hey Everyone, I upgraded a Dual Core Machine to 7.2-Stable (2 Days ago),

Re: System crawls after Upgrade 7.0-7.2

2009-09-09 Thread Tobias Lott
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 21:30:22 +0200 Tobias Lott tl...@gamesnet.de wrote: On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 07:02:13 -1000 Clifton Royston clift...@lava.net wrote: On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:48:07AM +0200, Tobias Lott wrote: On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:19:45 +0200 Tobias Lott tl...@gamesnet.de wrote:

Re: incorrect usleep/select delays with HZ 2500

2009-09-09 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 01:24:53PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday 08 September 2009 5:01:00 pm Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 01:08:23PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Sunday 06 September 2009 11:51:54 am Luigi Rizzo wrote: [Note 3] the TSC frequency is computed reading

Re: ifconfig_ed0=DHCP does not work on 8.0-BETA3

2009-09-09 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 07:07:01PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote: Le Mer 9 sep 09 ? 17:52:57 +0200, Brooks Davis bro...@freebsd.org ?crivait?: I'd rather not mention the link state changed message since I'd love to see it go away. How's this? Seems good, go! Thanks. I've committed

Re: incorrect usleep/select delays with HZ 2500

2009-09-09 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 4:32:16 pm Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 01:24:53PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Tuesday 08 September 2009 5:01:00 pm Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 01:08:23PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Sunday 06 September 2009 11:51:54 am

Re: Upgrade FreeBSD 7.1 to 7.2

2009-09-09 Thread N.J. Mann
In message y9lws488fu9@c052021.wlan.net.ed.ac.uk, Michael Sperber (sper...@deinprogramm.de) wrote: Robert Watson rwat...@freebsd.org writes: FWIW, the main problem I ran into with my 8.0 upgrade is that 8.0 uses the uart(4) driver for serial ports, and sio(4), 7.2's default,

Re: GCC -m32 option on FreeBSD/AMD64 7.2

2009-09-09 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2009-Sep-01 19:13:03 +0200, Václav Haisman v.hais...@sh.cvut.cz wrote: is C++ + GCC -m32 option officially supported by FreeBSD/AMD64 7.2? The short answer is no - though this is a common request and there are some PRs open for it. At present, the only supported way to build i386 code on

Re: incorrect usleep/select delays with HZ 2500

2009-09-09 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 04:42:05PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: ... It would explain why it gets better later since the uhci(4), ohci(4) and ehci(4) drivers disable the SMI# interrupts while attaching to the controllers. ok makes sense -- if the SMI interrupts last longer than 1/HZ

Re: general protection fault on boot.

2009-09-09 Thread Vincent Hoffman
John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday 09 September 2009 1:38:59 pm John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday 09 September 2009 12:32:51 pm Vincent Hoffman wrote: Hi all, I've been running the 8.0-BETAs in a xen virtual machine (hvm/fully virtualised) for testing and something between

Re: general protection fault on boot.

2009-09-09 Thread Vincent Hoffman
Kostik Belousov wrote: On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 01:38:59PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday 09 September 2009 12:32:51 pm Vincent Hoffman wrote: Hi all, I've been running the 8.0-BETAs in a xen virtual machine (hvm/fully virtualised) for testing and something between

Re: Detecting CPU throttling on over temperature

2009-09-09 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Robert Noland wrote: I am pretty sure it would be throttling but I think that works by maintaining the frequency but stalling the CPU some percentage of the time. I have p4tcc loaded (in GENERIC) but it doesn't show up, I only get.. Is this a core2duo? IIRC, they

Re: Detecting CPU throttling on over temperature

2009-09-09 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Alexander Motin wrote: around 100C. I did pull the c2d cpu docs at one point trying to look at cpufreq. If you are bored, you can grab the docs from intel and double check. AFAIR C2D supports three protection technologies. When CPU is hot, it starts reducing