Hello all,
is it correct to print OK here?
-- snip --
#!/bin/sh
if false || ! echo bla | grep -q bla; then
echo OK
fi
-- snap ---
7.2-STABLE (can't check others at the moment)
does which I think is wrong...
Thanks,
on 01/10/2009 17:49 Andre Albsmeier said the following:
Hello all,
is it correct to print OK here?
-- snip --
#!/bin/sh
if false || ! echo bla | grep -q bla; then
echo OK
fi
-- snap ---
7.2-STABLE (can't check
On Thu, 01-Oct-2009 at 18:44:08 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 01/10/2009 17:49 Andre Albsmeier said the following:
Hello all,
is it correct to print OK here?
-- snip --
#!/bin/sh
if false || ! echo bla | grep -q bla; then
echo OK
fi
On Thu, 01-Oct-2009 at 20:31:01 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
On Thu, 01-Oct-2009 at 18:44:08 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 01/10/2009 17:49 Andre Albsmeier said the following:
Hello all,
is it correct to print OK here?
-- snip --
Hi all
I've searched the archives and the web in vain. Maybe somebody here can tell me
how well FreeBSD stable supports Intel's entry level server board S3420GPLC?
specifically, will it work with the on board RAID?
thanks
Yuv
___
I have rxd and txd set to 1024. How high can I safely go?
# add more descriptors to em devices.
hw.em.rxd=1024
hw.em.txd=1024
### other settings... I have tried rx_int_delay=0 and 32 ... doesn't
seem to make the watchdogs go away.
dev.em.4.rx_int_delay: 32
dev.em.4.tx_int_delay: 66
I have a quad card in a PCIe 8x port, and there are 2 ports on the
motherboard. I just read the manual and see that the on board ports are
PCIe 1x.
I have been seeing watchdog events on the onboard ports as well as on
the PCIe card. The router is doing roughly 50Mbps on em0, em4 em5.
I would say that 1024 should be enough, I thought maybe you were at 256.
amd64 kernels just perform better at a lot of things, however I/O is not
necessarily
one of them, so I wouldn't claim it for sure, still I'd always default to 64
bit these
days unless there's some other reason not to.
What
What about system load, perhaps something is bogging the thing down so that
it cannot adequately service the network interrupts??
Hardly anything is running on the box...
Only things on the box: zebra bgpd (3 peers...) sshd snmpd
Here is the top of 'top':
load averages: 0.06, 0.08, 0.07
Apologies for including all of OP - but it was 3 months ago and
provides necessary context. See solution below OP.
On Wed, 08 Jul 2009, 18:52 +1000, John Marshall wrote:
I source upgraded a (test) server here (i386) from 7.2-RELEASE-p2 to
8.0-BETA1 this morning. I use GSSAPI as the primary
Having just spent ages trying to discover why I couldn't log in to one
of my recently-upgraded FreeBSD 8.0-RC1 servers...
Kerberos login processing has changed!
I had a .k5login file on the server with a single entry:
john/ad...@my.realm
On FreeBSD 7.2 that meant that I could log in as john on
11 matches
Mail list logo
