Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Errata Notice FreeBSD-EN-09:05.null

2009-10-07 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Corrected: 2009-10-02 18:09:56 UTC (RELENG_8, 8.0-RC2) 2009-10-02 18:09:56 UTC (RELENG_7, 7.2-STABLE) 2009-10-02 18:09:56 UTC (RELENG_7_2, 7.2-RELEASE-p4) 2009-10-02 18:09:56 UTC (RELENG_7_1, 7.1-RELEASE-p8) 2009-10-02

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Errata Notice FreeBSD-EN-09:05.null

2009-10-07 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Corrected: 2009-10-02 18:09:56 UTC (RELENG_8, 8.0-RC2) 2009-10-02 18:09:56 UTC (RELENG_7, 7.2-STABLE) 2009-10-02 18:09:56 UTC (RELENG_7_2, 7.2-RELEASE-p4) 2009-10-02 18:09:56 UTC (RELENG_7_1,

Installing Cacti from Ports

2009-10-07 Thread mailinglist
I hada VM running an older installation of FreeBSD 7.2. I recently got back to it and tried to install Cacti from the ports collection. I cvsup'd in an up-to-date ports collection, and did the usual make, make install for Cacti. During the make install process a dependency failed to build.

samba - SIGABRT

2009-10-07 Thread Oliver Lehmann
Hi, I wonder what may have caused this and how should I debug it to find the source? I Installed samba 3.3.7 on a clean 8.0-RC1 and I upgraded then my system to the latest RELENG_8. Since I've not the time searching much longer for the error I'll just go to upgrade to 3.3.8 (recompile it...)

RE: Installing Cacti from Ports

2009-10-07 Thread mailinglist
As part of the freebsd-update process I did run a few portupgrade commands. But I thought portupgrade only did whatever it does to installed ports. Or are you saying it upgraded the xcb port which allowed Cacti to build to completion? Also, off topic I know, but what is the proper way to

Re: Installing Cacti from Ports

2009-10-07 Thread Adam Vande More
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:31 PM, mailinglist mailingl...@ucwv.edu wrote: I hada VM running an older installation of FreeBSD 7.2. I recently got back to it and tried to install Cacti from the ports collection. I cvsup'd in an up-to-date ports collection, and did the usual make, make install

Re: Installing Cacti from Ports

2009-10-07 Thread Adam Vande More
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:21 PM, mailinglist mailingl...@ucwv.edu wrote: As part of the freebsd-update process I did run a few portupgrade commands. But I thought portupgrade only did whatever it does to installed ports. Or are you saying it upgraded the xcb port which allowed Cacti to build

Re: samba - SIGABRT

2009-10-07 Thread jhell
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 20:09 +0200, lehmann@ wrote: Hi, I wonder what may have caused this and how should I debug it to find the source? I Installed samba 3.3.7 on a clean 8.0-RC1 and I upgraded then my system to the latest RELENG_8. Since I've not the time searching much longer for the error I'll

Re: samba - SIGABRT

2009-10-07 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On Wednesday 07 October 2009 20:09:59 Oliver Lehmann wrote: Hi, I wonder what may have caused this and how should I debug it to find the source? I Installed samba 3.3.7 on a clean 8.0-RC1 and I upgraded then my system to the latest RELENG_8. Since I've not the time searching much longer for

Re: 8.0-RC1: kernel page fault in NLM master thread (VIMAGE or ZFS related?)

2009-10-07 Thread Jamie Gritton
Rick Macklem wrote: On Sun, 27 Sep 2009, Robert Watson wrote: On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Jamie Gritton wrote: It seems to be NFS related. I think the null pointer in question is from the export's anonymous credential. Try the patch below and see if it helps (which I guess means run it overnight

[SOLVED] Re: libthr and daemon()

2009-10-07 Thread Matthew Fleming
2) why would fork resolve to the one in libc (presumably, I'm not sure how to prove this) instead of the one in libthr? Well, I'm not sure how the application plus libraries linked, but there was no explicit -lthr or -lpthread in the Makefile. So the resulting binary used the fork() in libc.

NDIS broken?

2009-10-07 Thread Jeff Dowsley
Folks Just upgraded from 7.2 to 8.0RC1 Under 7.2, I was using an ndis wrapper to provide a Windows network driver for an old Linksys PCMIA card (non-ath). Worked beautifully as per the Handbook under 7.2. Sadly, under 8.0RC1, the process to generate the wrapper appears to work OK, but

Re: NDIS broken?

2009-10-07 Thread Glen Barber
Hi On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Jeff Dowsley jeff.dows...@mac.com wrote: Folks Just upgraded from 7.2 to 8.0RC1 Under 7.2, I was using an ndis wrapper to provide a Windows network driver for an old Linksys PCMIA card (non-ath). Worked beautifully as per the Handbook under 7.2. Sadly,

r197748 - base/stable/7/bin/sh/ 7.2-STABLE i386

2009-10-07 Thread jhell
r197748 | jilles | 2009-10-04 13:16:11 -0400 (Sun, 04 Oct 2009) | 7 lines MFC r197371: Mention that NUL characters are not allowed in sh(1) input. I do not consider this a bug because POSIX permits it and argument

Re: r197748 - base/stable/7/bin/sh/ 7.2-STABLE i386

2009-10-07 Thread Barney Wolff
I believe you are wrong about prior behavior. sudo is from a port and is in /usr/local/bin. Any shell is going to expand the list of args *before* giving control to the executable. So the system will churn for a while before sudo gets to ask for the password. On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 12:59:36AM