whats best pracfive for ZFS on a whole disc these days ?

2009-10-26 Thread Pete French
just about to build a new ZFS based system and I was wondering what the recommended way to dedicate a whole disc to ZFS is these days. Should I just give it 'da1', 'da2' etc as I have done in the past, or is it better to use GPT to create a partition over the whole disc, which is marked as being

Modbus Serial - Modbus TCP/IP

2009-10-26 Thread Exemys
This is a message in multipart MIME format. Your mail client should not be displaying this. Consider upgrading your mail client to view this message correctly. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Possible scheduler (SCHED_ULE) bug?

2009-10-26 Thread Arnaud Houdelette
Jaime Bozza a écrit : The additional information I have (over the PR) is that: 1) Files over 64K cause the problem, not just larger files I thought it was over 1 MB or so. But maybe I'm wrong. ISTR that I couldn't trigger it with some images of around 70K. I discovered it

Re: Possible scheduler (SCHED_ULE) bug?

2009-10-26 Thread Jacob Myers
Arnaud Houdelette wrote: I had the same issue using 7.1 amd64, with ZFS, no SMP. Not really sure what is the size boundary. I can't really test either, as the machine is remote. But I confirm that each tentative upload of certain relatively 'big' files (around 1MB) with wordpress hanged the

NULL-pointer reference in ulpt

2009-10-26 Thread Alban Hertroys
I didn't get any replies to my previous report, so I'm trying again. I frequently get a kernel-panic after printing something to my USB printer (A Samsung ML-1210). It looks like usb_setup_xfer() is called with a NULL-pointer for xfer from ulpt_tick(). System is a 7.2-STABLE, last updated

Re: FreeBSD and SATA Port Multipliers

2009-10-26 Thread Steve Polyack
Alexander Motin wrote: Steve Polyack wrote: Alexander Motin wrote: You can try this patch against today's HEAD: http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/cam-ata.20091022.patch I tried the patch this morning against a fresh checkout of HEAD. Immediately after boot only one device per

RE: Possible scheduler (SCHED_ULE) bug?

2009-10-26 Thread Jaime Bozza
From: Jacob Myers [mailto:ja...@whotookspaz.org] Arnaud Houdelette wrote: I had the same issue using 7.1 amd64, with ZFS, no SMP. Not really sure what is the size boundary. I can't really test either, as the machine is remote. But I confirm that each tentative upload of certain

Re: FreeBSD and SATA Port Multipliers

2009-10-26 Thread Alexander Motin
Steve Polyack wrote: I'm about to try today's head and patch. I'll let you know how it goes. Ok. Just to be sure it is not cabling issue (I have seen such), try also limit port speed to 1.5Gbps by adding to loader.conf: hint.siisch.0.sata_rev=1 hint.siisch.1.sata_rev=1 hint.siisch.2.sata_rev=1

RE: Possible scheduler (SCHED_ULE) bug?

2009-10-26 Thread Jaime Bozza
Sincerely, Jaime Bozza MindSites Group, LLC From: Dylan Cochran [mailto:heliocent...@gmail.com] Superficially, this seams identical to a deadlock I reported for 7.1-RC1. Would you mind compiling a kernel with these options: snip KDB: stack backtrace:

RE: Possible scheduler (SCHED_ULE) bug?

2009-10-26 Thread Jaime Bozza
From: Kostik Belousov [mailto:kostik...@gmail.com] Can you look up the source line for kern_sendfile+0x90d in your kernel ? Do kgdb kernel.debug, then execute list *(kern_sendfile+0x90d). In my case, it was kern_sendfile+0x6ad (rebuilt with RELENG_7 this weekend). Here's the output: (kgdb)

Re: MCP55 SATA solution to test

2009-10-26 Thread Pascal Hofstee
2009/10/25 Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org: Hi. Thanks to one man who provided access to his machine, I seem to found how to fix device detection on nVidia MCP55 SATA controller on amd64 8.0. Looks like this controller need some time (very short) to enable BAR(5) memory access after PCI

Re: FreeBSD and SATA Port Multipliers

2009-10-26 Thread Steve Polyack
Alexander Motin wrote: Steve Polyack wrote: I'm about to try today's head and patch. I'll let you know how it goes. Ok. Just to be sure it is not cabling issue (I have seen such), try also limit port speed to 1.5Gbps by adding to loader.conf: hint.siisch.0.sata_rev=1

Re: FreeBSD and SATA Port Multipliers

2009-10-26 Thread Steve Polyack
Steve Polyack wrote: Alexander Motin wrote: Steve Polyack wrote: I'm about to try today's head and patch. I'll let you know how it goes. Ok. Just to be sure it is not cabling issue (I have seen such), try also limit port speed to 1.5Gbps by adding to loader.conf:

RE: Broadcom on HP Proliant ML150G6 not detected by 8.0RC1 AMD64

2009-10-26 Thread Johan Hendriks
Hello all I just installed FreeBSD 8.0RC1 AMD64 on my new HP Proliant ML150 G6 server. It fails to detect the Broadcom network interface. Pciconf -lv gives me the following. no...@pci0:4:0:0:class=0x02 card=0x705d10c chip=0x165b14e4 rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 vendor

Re: whats best pracfive for ZFS on a whole disc these days ?

2009-10-26 Thread Robert Noland
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 11:19 +, Pete French wrote: just about to build a new ZFS based system and I was wondering what the recommended way to dedicate a whole disc to ZFS is these days. Should I just give it 'da1', 'da2' etc as I have done in the past, or is it better to use GPT to create a

Re: Broadcom on HP Proliant ML150G6 not detected by 8.0RC1 AMD64

2009-10-26 Thread Stanislav Sedov
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:49:37 +0100 Johan Hendriks jo...@double-l.nl mentioned: I saw a commit from Bjoern A. Zeeb which describe the hang, but do not know if this can be reverted back to 8.x before the release. svn commit: r198049 - head/sys/dev/bge Bjoern A. Zeeb regards, and thank you

Re: Broadcom on HP Proliant ML150G6 not detected by 8.0RC1 AMD64

2009-10-26 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday 23 October 2009 11:17:33 am Johan Hendriks wrote: On Thursday 22 October 2009 11:07:23 am Johan Hendriks wrote: Hello all I just installed FreeBSD 8.0RC1 AMD64 on my new HP Proliant ML150 G6 server. It fails to detect the Broadcom network interface. Pciconf -lv

RE: Possible scheduler (SCHED_ULE) bug?

2009-10-26 Thread Jaime Bozza
From: Arnaud Houdelette [mailto:arnaud.houdele...@tzim.net] I haven't tried larger files - Maybe the boundary is different on amd64? Doing some quick tests right now, I was able to upload a 100MB file without a problem, but this is an AMD64 system with SMP, plus the filesystem is all ZFS,

RE: Broadcom on HP Proliant ML150G6 not detected by 8.0RC1 AMD64

2009-10-26 Thread Johan Hendriks
I saw a commit from Bjoern A. Zeeb which describe the hang, but do not know if this can be reverted back to 8.x before the release. svn commit: r198049 - head/sys/dev/bge Bjoern A. Zeeb regards, and thank you for your time. cc'ed stas@ and bz@ ( hope they do not mind, if so I am

RE: Broadcom on HP Proliant ML150G6 not detected by 8.0RC1 AMD64

2009-10-26 Thread Johan Hendriks
Ok done that, and the card is found, only the server is not very stable right now. It does not continue the boot. It stops at setting the hostname Setting hostname: server01.mydomain.local And it stays there. Can you tell what it is doing (with Ctrl-T, or perhaps including ddb and

8.0-RC2

2009-10-26 Thread Brian Whalen
I just got this via csup, guess we are getting close, excellent. Brian ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: NULL-pointer reference in ulpt

2009-10-26 Thread Ronald Klop
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:51:23 +0100, Alban Hertroys dal...@solfertje.student.utwente.nl wrote: I didn't get any replies to my previous report, so I'm trying again. I frequently get a kernel-panic after printing something to my USB printer (A Samsung ML-1210). It looks like usb_setup_xfer()

Re: 8.0: glabel on a gjournaled FS is broken

2009-10-26 Thread Oliver Lehmann
Oliver Lehmann wrote: [glabel with gjournaled device not working] So should I create a PR for that since none responded to that topic? -- Oliver Lehmann http://www.pofo.de/ http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Some questions about da0 on USB2 (recent bad behaviour)

2009-10-26 Thread Andrew Reilly
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 07:07:00PM +, b. f. wrote: That is: it seems to work fine for some fraction of a minute (doesn't seem to be longer than a minute, anyway), and then stops completely for several minutes (processes reading or writing sit in D state in ps) and then starts again, after

Re: Some questions about da0 on USB2 (recent bad behaviour)

2009-10-26 Thread b. f.
On 10/26/09, Andrew Reilly arei...@bigpond.net.au wrote: On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 07:07:00PM +, b. f. wrote: ... I haven't run -current for, probably, ten years, and the occasional messages about lock-order-reversals worry me a bit, but don't seem to be doing any harm. Should I report

uart(4) on stable/7

2009-10-26 Thread Matthew Fleming
I am interested in using uart(4) instead of sio(4) on stable/7, to ease our eventual transition to stable/8 or CURRENT. I added device uart and changed up /boot/device.hints (there were no entries in /etc/ttys that mentioned sio), and I get something that boots and has messages on the console, up

Re: uart(4) on stable/7

2009-10-26 Thread Andrew Thompson
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:57:42PM -0700, Matthew Fleming wrote: I am interested in using uart(4) instead of sio(4) on stable/7, to ease our eventual transition to stable/8 or CURRENT. I added device uart and changed up /boot/device.hints (there were no entries in /etc/ttys that mentioned

Re: whats best pracfive for ZFS on a whole disc these days ?

2009-10-26 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Mon, October 26, 2009 13:38, Robert Noland wrote: On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 11:19 +, Pete French wrote: just about to build a new ZFS based system and I was wondering what the recommended way to dedicate a whole disc to ZFS is these days. Should I just give it 'da1', 'da2' etc as I have

Re: uart(4) on stable/7

2009-10-26 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Oct 26, 2009, at 2:57 PM, Matthew Fleming wrote: I can ssh to my box, echo to /dev/console appears on the console; messages on reboot appear on the console, just not the login prompt. Does anyone know what else I may be missing to use uart(4)? As Andrew pointed put, you need to update