On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 10:53:00PM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 27-2-2010 21:32, Eirik Øverby wrote:
I've had a discussion with some folks on this for a while. I can easil=y
reproduce this situation by mounting a FreeBSD ZFS filesystem via
NFS-UDP from an OpenBSD machine. Telling
On Feb 28, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
I'm pulling in Robert Watson, who has some familiarity with the UDP
stack/code in FreeBSD. I'm not sure he'll be a sufficient source of
knowledge for this specific issue since it appears (?) to be specific to
NFS; Rick Macklem would be a
On 28 Feb 2010, at 03:22, Jim Pingle wrote:
On 2/27/2010 9:09 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 27 Feb 2010, at 20:29, Robert Watson wrote:
Progress on supporting 11n with atheros cards is on going. There's much more
to it than adapting the rate control algorithm. Please stay tuned.
Are you aware
On Feb 28, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
I'm pulling in Robert Watson, who has some familiarity with the UDP
stack/code in FreeBSD. I'm not sure he'll be a sufficient source of
knowledge for this specific issue since it appears (?) to be specific =to
NFS; Rick Macklem would
On Feb 28, 2010, at 2:52 PM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
well, I have further reduced the problem, it happens with NFS/UDP writes.
i'll try the wireshark road, but i'm very rusty with RPC, the other road is to
check the changes, my oldest is from late october (RC2) where it's happening,
while
On 2/28/2010 7:54 AM, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 28 Feb 2010, at 03:22, Jim Pingle wrote:
Are you aware if similar work ongoing for the mwl(4) based 802.11n
cards? I picked up a couple cheap this past week and have them working
with hostapd but, as with the OP in the thread, only with G rates.
The
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:21:28 + Robert N. M. Watson
rwat...@freebsd.org wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs? :
RNMW It's almost certainly one or a small number of very specific RPCs
RNMW that are triggering it -- maybe OpenBSD does an extra lookup, or
RNMW stat, or something, on a name
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:52:44 +0200 Daniel Braniss da...@cs.huji.ac.il
wrote about Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/udp (was: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs):
DB well, I have further reduced the problem, it happens with NFS/UDP
DB writes. i'll try the wireshark road, but i'm very rusty with RPC, the
DB other
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 12:38:19PM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote:
On 2/28/2010 7:54 AM, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 28 Feb 2010, at 03:22, Jim Pingle wrote:
Are you aware if similar work ongoing for the mwl(4) based 802.11n
cards? I picked up a couple cheap this past week and have them working
with
On 28 Feb 2010, at 17:38, Jim Pingle wrote:
On 2/28/2010 7:54 AM, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 28 Feb 2010, at 03:22, Jim Pingle wrote:
Are you aware if similar work ongoing for the mwl(4) based 802.11n
cards? I picked up a couple cheap this past week and have them working
with hostapd but, as with
A bunch of use have colo'd a server at an ISP. We each run our own KVM
(I have no other details at present). I've been running FreeBSD 7.3
inside my KVM (everyone else is running Linux.
I encountered a problem when I tried to upgrade the install from
7.2-stable to 7.3-stable.
The boot
On 2/28/2010 2:29 PM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 12:38:19PM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote:
[snip]
In this case, the mwl card is the AP. The client line is from an
associated Windows 7 laptop with an Intel 5100abgn card which does show
the AP as 802.11n in the AP list. I'm
On 2/28/2010 7:03 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 28 Feb 2010, at 17:38, Jim Pingle wrote:
Are there some other bits that need set in order to have clients
associate with HT rates? Or some other prerequisite conditions such as
number of attached antennae? I do only have one antenna attached as I
On 1 Mar 2010, at 02:26, Jim Pingle wrote:
On 2/28/2010 7:03 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 28 Feb 2010, at 17:38, Jim Pingle wrote:
Are there some other bits that need set in order to have clients
associate with HT rates? Or some other prerequisite conditions such as
number of attached antennae?
On 2/28/2010 9:41 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 1 Mar 2010, at 02:26, Jim Pingle wrote:
Ah, I wasn't aware of wlandebug(8). However, it doesn't seem to operate
on this mwl(4) card. It sets the value of the sysctl net.wlan.0.debug
and that doesn't show up on my system. Another system with a ral(4)
On 1 Mar 2010, at 03:05, Jim Pingle wrote:
On 2/28/2010 9:41 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 1 Mar 2010, at 02:26, Jim Pingle wrote:
Ah, I wasn't aware of wlandebug(8). However, it doesn't seem to operate
on this mwl(4) card. It sets the value of the sysctl net.wlan.0.debug
and that doesn't show up
On 2/28/2010 10:16 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 1 Mar 2010, at 03:05, Jim Pingle wrote:
On 2/28/2010 9:41 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 1 Mar 2010, at 02:26, Jim Pingle wrote:
Ah, I wasn't aware of wlandebug(8). However, it doesn't seem to operate
on this mwl(4) card. It sets the value of the sysctl
I have a few NASes based on FreeBSD 7.2 and quagga 0.99.14, they all have same
configuration with little changes.
When I add to network a test server based on FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE
with quagga 0.99.15, other servers doesn't receive HELLO packets from him.
nas9# tcpdump -i vr0 proto ospf
18 matches
Mail list logo
