Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote:
... TCC and throttling ...
they were intended for thermal management, not power management.
Shouldn't the two be equivalent? Heat generated is directly related
to power consumed.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
On 13.05.2010 06:46, Andy Dills wrote:
I'm working on getting p0f integrated with amavisd-new. Everything is
great, with the exception that I can't get the neccessary commands to
execute on boot.
I started with rc.local and that didn't work. So I made this simple script
in
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 00:09:05 -0700
From: per...@pluto.rain.com
Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote:
... TCC and throttling ...
they were intended for thermal management, not power management.
Shouldn't the two be equivalent? Heat generated is directly related
to power consumed.
On 05/13/10 01:50, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Perhaps, your BEFORE: securelevel may be a culprit, it's too early
to run something from /usr/local/bin.
securelevel is one of the last things to run, and must run after all the
file systems are mounted.
Doug
--
... and that's just a
rihad writes:
| Hi, I'm thinking of enabling the watchdog on our Dell PowerEdge 2950 /
| FreeBSD 8.0 amd64, so that it reboots the machine in case of lockups.
| Right now it doesn't work:
|
| # watchdog
| watchdog: patting the dog: Operation not supported
| #
| Looking through the kernel
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Brandon Gooch
jamesbrandongo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2010/5/12 David DEMELIER demelier.da...@gmail.com:
I remove the patch, and built the kernel (I updated the src this
morning) and it does not
2010/5/14 Giovanni Trematerra giovanni.tremate...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Brandon Gooch
jamesbrandongo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2010/5/12 David DEMELIER demelier.da...@gmail.com:
I remove the patch, and
Hello,
I recently reinstalled FreeBSD 8.0 on my computer, after a long hiatus
(last version before that was 7-CURRENT before 7.0-RELEASE, on an old
computer). I read a lot of documentation to try and make sure I caught
up with any important changes before messing too much with the system.
I did a
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:00:38PM -0300, Fred Souza wrote:
I did a similar procedure as I used to on the old system, grabbed a
fresh ports.tar.gz, uncompressed it under /usr, installed cvsup and
proceeded to updating /usr/src to -STABLE (using the RELENG_8 tag). So
far, so good.
1) We use
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:00:38PM -0300, Fred Souza wrote:
I give up and reinstall (that first install had given me quite a
headache with incorrect drive geometry [that I had to fix with a lot
of research to get to TestDisk and GAG], so I thought it was best to
just start fresh). I do the
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 23:51, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
1) We use csup now, not cvsup. csup comes with the base system, so
there's no need to install cvsup.
2) I'm not sure why you're downloading ports.tar.gz and extracting it.
This means that /var/db/sup/ports-all
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 00:06, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
There is probably an ata(4) device layer change which either fixes (yes
really), breaks (possibly), or enhances (likely) support for your ATA or
SATA controller. This is pretty much how the ata(4) layer has behaved
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:16:47AM -0300, Fred Souza wrote:
I'd recommend booting/trying an actual 8.0-STABLE snapshot image from
here:
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/201004/
This will allow you to boot and install 8.0-STABLE on your system. You
should see devices ad10
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 00:25, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
Absolutely. I've done it myself many times over the years, including
remotely over serial console. However, you said you did that then typed
exit rather than reboot, and the end result was a kernel panic.
Yes, I
I'm reposting this over here at the suggestion of the Forums moderator.
The original post is at http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=14163
Got an interesting crash just now (well, as interesting as a crash on a
soon-to-be production system can be).
This is 8-STABLE/amd64, last cvsup'd
On 05/14/2010 04:13 AM, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
rihad writes:
| Hi, I'm thinking of enabling the watchdog on our Dell PowerEdge 2950 /
| FreeBSD 8.0 amd64, so that it reboots the machine in case of lockups.
| Right now it doesn't work:
|
| # watchdog
| watchdog: patting the dog: Operation not
16 matches
Mail list logo
