on 23/06/2010 05:58 Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira said the following:
Hi,
I am getting more than 4 thousand of the following messages a day:
WARNING pid 24509 (python2.6): ioctl sign-extension ioctl 8004667e
This ioctl is FIONBIO.
I believe that I saw another report about it
# grep REQUIRE /etc/rc.d/ppp
# REQUIRE: netif ldconfig
^ i had to add this
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Hi again,
I am pretty sure that Adam is right about the version mismatch. I
used sysinstall to update the ports tree and had to change options from
8.0-RELEASE-p3 to 8.0-RELEASE. Cvsup deleted the ports tree. Don't know
if I have to change the RELENG_8 to something else.
# $FreeBSD:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Nathan Maier maier.nat...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi again,
I am pretty sure that Adam is right about the version mismatch. I used
sysinstall to update the ports tree and had to change options from
8.0-RELEASE-p3 to 8.0-RELEASE. Cvsup deleted the ports tree.
Okay,
THe mouse is working well enough. I changed my label in
ports-supfile to tag=. which I found in documentation as
applicable to ports supfiles. Is this different from source
supfiles where . means CURRENT release.
Anyhow, after portupgrade -a, I tried xdm with
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:54:41AM -0500, Nathan Peet Maier wrote:
I changed my label in ports-supfile to tag=. which I found in
documentation as applicable to ports supfiles. Is this different
from source supfiles where . means CURRENT release.
Correct. The tag= line for
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Nathan Maier maier.nat...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi again,
I am pretty sure that Adam is right about the version mismatch. I used
sysinstall to update the ports tree and had to change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 2010/06/22 19:58, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote:
Hi,
I am getting more than 4 thousand of the following messages a day:
WARNING pid 24509 (python2.6): ioctl sign-extension ioctl 8004667e
[...]
I think we may need
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 02:12 pm, Xin LI wrote:
Hi,
On 2010/06/22 19:58, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote:
Hi,
I am getting more than 4 thousand of the following messages a
day:
WARNING pid 24509 (python2.6): ioctl sign-extension ioctl
8004667e
[...]
I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010/06/23 11:37, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 02:12 pm, Xin LI wrote:
Hi,
On 2010/06/22 19:58, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote:
Hi,
I am getting more than 4 thousand of the following messages a
day:
WARNING pid
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 02:41 pm, Xin LI wrote:
On 2010/06/23 11:37, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 02:12 pm, Xin LI wrote:
Hi,
On 2010/06/22 19:58, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote:
Hi,
I am getting more than 4 thousand of the following messages a
day:
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 03:01 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 02:41 pm, Xin LI wrote:
On 2010/06/23 11:37, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 02:12 pm, Xin LI wrote:
Hi,
On 2010/06/22 19:58, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote:
Hi,
I am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010/06/23 12:10, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
It is still a kludge and it won't be fixed. :-(
Another thought - what about just hiding the printf under #ifdef
DIAGNOSTIC... I don't really see any reason why we must print it out if
we truncate it every
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 03:16 pm, Xin LI wrote:
On 2010/06/23 12:10, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
It is still a kludge and it won't be fixed. :-(
Another thought - what about just hiding the printf under #ifdef
DIAGNOSTIC... I don't really see any reason why we must print it
out if we truncate it
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 03:10 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 03:01 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 02:41 pm, Xin LI wrote:
On 2010/06/23 11:37, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 02:12 pm, Xin LI wrote:
Hi,
On 2010/06/22 19:58,
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 03:38 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 03:10 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 03:01 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 02:41 pm, Xin LI wrote:
On 2010/06/23 11:37, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 23 June 2010
16 matches
Mail list logo
