In message 2010085940.4...@unknown, Bruce Cran writes:
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 21:23:48 +
Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk wrote:
http://phk/misc/build_options_stable_8_210741/
Did you mean http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/build_options_stable_8_210741/ ?
Yes, sorry, I was
on 23/08/2010 05:05 Dan Langille said the following:
On 8/22/2010 9:18 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
What does this mean?
kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813
kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status 0x
kernel: MCA: Vendor AuthenticAMD, ID 0xf5a, APIC ID 0
On 08/20/10 12:30, Heinrich Rebehn wrote:
I am somewhat concerned about the numbers for per-char-output and
per-char-input. In fact, i have never before seen that low numbers in a
bonnie test. Using a single disk with UFS yields about 6 times as much.
BTW: Running OpenSolaris on the same
It was brought to my attention that on FreeBSD with a hardware watchdog
in use (e.g. ichwd(4) + watchdogd(8)), once the kernel panics, it's
quite possible for the watchdog to fire (reboot the system) once the
panic has happened. This issue basically inhibits the ability for a
system with a
In message 20100823103412.ga21...@icarus.home.lan, Jeremy Chadwick writes:
It was brought to my attention that on FreeBSD with a hardware watchdog
in use (e.g. ichwd(4) + watchdogd(8)), once the kernel panics, it's
quite possible for the watchdog to fire (reboot the system) once the
panic has
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
PR bin/145183, opened in 2010 (not sure if this is the same):
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/145183
Speaking for this I think we can do it by issuing an explicit
watchdog(8) command on shutdown
on 23/08/2010 13:53 Poul-Henning Kamp said the following:
In message 20100823103412.ga21...@icarus.home.lan, Jeremy Chadwick writes:
It was brought to my attention that on FreeBSD with a hardware watchdog
in use (e.g. ichwd(4) + watchdogd(8)), once the kernel panics, it's
quite possible for
In message 4c725dfc.8000...@icyb.net.ua, Andriy Gapon writes:
on 23/08/2010 13:53 Poul-Henning Kamp said the following:
In message 20100823103412.ga21...@icarus.home.lan, Jeremy Chadwick writes:
Another workaround is to set watchdog timeout large enough for dumping to
complete, but that
On Monday, August 23, 2010 2:44:38 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 23/08/2010 05:05 Dan Langille said the following:
On 8/22/2010 9:18 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
What does this mean?
kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813
kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status
On Friday, August 20, 2010 8:46:04 am Mikhail T. wrote:
Hello!
With some trickery (had to define: WITHOUT_CDDL, WITHOUT_SSP, WITH_GCC3,
NO_WERROR) I upgraded my laptop directly from 6.3 to 8.1-STABLE. It now
boots nicely.
I'd like to make another round of buildworld/buildkernel -- using
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:07:47AM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote:
PR bin/145183, opened in 2010 (not sure if this is the same):
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/145183
Speaking for this I think we can do
23.08.2010 08:17, John Baldwin написав(ла):
With some trickery (had to define: WITHOUT_CDDL, WITHOUT_SSP, WITH_GCC3,
NO_WERROR) I upgraded my laptop directly from 6.3 to 8.1-STABLE. It now
boots nicely.
I'd like to make another round of buildworld/buildkernel -- using the
existing
On 2010-Aug-21 23:04:35 +0100, Tim Bishop t...@bishnet.net wrote:
I've had a problem on a FreeBSD 8.1R system for a few weeks. It seems
that ZFS gets in to an almost unresponsive state. Last time it did it
(two weeks ago) I couldn't even log in, although the system was up, this
time I could manage
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 08:20:35AM -0400 I heard the voice of
John Baldwin, and lo! it spake thus:
It is not private, it is in //depot/projects/mcelog/... in p4.
Which may as well be Siberia for us lowly non-developers. Any chance
you could stick a tarball or a patch against upstream mcelog
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 05:24:29PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Aug 21), Tim Bishop said:
I've had a problem on a FreeBSD 8.1R system for a few weeks. It seems
that ZFS gets in to an almost unresponsive state. Last time it did it
(two weeks ago) I couldn't even log in,
On 8/22/2010 10:05 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
On 8/22/2010 9:18 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
What does this mean?
kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813
kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status 0x
kernel: MCA: Vendor AuthenticAMD, ID 0xf5a, APIC ID 0
kernel: MCA: CPU
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 06:49:23AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2010-Aug-21 23:04:35 +0100, Tim Bishop t...@bishnet.net wrote:
I've had a problem on a FreeBSD 8.1R system for a few weeks. It seems
that ZFS gets in to an almost unresponsive state. Last time it did it
(two weeks ago) I couldn't
on 24/08/2010 02:43 Dan Langille said the following:
On 8/22/2010 10:05 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
On 8/22/2010 9:18 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
What does this mean?
kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813
kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status 0x
kernel: MCA:
On 8/23/2010 7:47 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 24/08/2010 02:43 Dan Langille said the following:
On 8/22/2010 10:05 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
On 8/22/2010 9:18 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
What does this mean?
kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813
kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105,
19 matches
Mail list logo
