On 10/21/10 21:06, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:50:03AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 05:48 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 20/10/2010 21:28 Sean Bruno said the following:
I guess, I could replace the kernel on the CD and have them reburn it?
That should
On 10/21/10 21:08, Randy Bush wrote:
FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #2: Thu Oct 21 15:30:45 UTC 2010
r...@rip.psg.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RIP amd64
console recording
em0: discard frame w/o packet header
em0: discard frame w/o packet header
em0: discard frame w/o packet header
em0: discard
I've seen people discuss about this and it happened to me as well.
Freebsd 8.1 stable 25th september amd64
This server has one single boot disk with ufs + 1 array (hardware, 3ware)
which hold 2,7TB data. I've formatted the latter with ZFS.
Things seemed to work ok until I upgraded the system.
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 03:03:53PM +0200, Giulio Ferro wrote:
[...snip; focusing specifically on this piece...]
If I launch du -s under /zfs (host machine, not jail) I get a total space
of about 750GB, but df -h always turns up with 2,7TB space occupied.
Is the ZFS filesystem (not pool)
On 10/22/2010 03:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 03:03:53PM +0200, Giulio Ferro wrote:
[...snip; focusing specifically on this piece...]
If I launch du -s under /zfs (host machine, not jail) I get a total space
of about 750GB, but df -h always turns up with 2,7TB space
At 03:08 PM 10/21/2010, Randy Bush wrote:
FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #2: Thu Oct 21 15:30:45 UTC 2010
r...@rip.psg.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RIP amd64
console recording
em0: discard frame w/o packet header
em0: discard frame w/o packet header
em0: discard frame w/o packet header
Hi Randy,
Do you know how this panic is triggered ? Are you able to
create it on demand ?
no i do not. bring server up and it'll happen in half an hour.
and the server was happy for two months. so i am thinking hardware.
randy
___
At 10:18 AM 10/22/2010, Randy Bush wrote:
Do you know how this panic is triggered ? Are you able to
create it on demand ?
no i do not. bring server up and it'll happen in half an hour.
and the server was happy for two months. so i am thinking hardware.
Perhaps. The reason I ask is that I
On 10/22/10 16:25, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 10:18 AM 10/22/2010, Randy Bush wrote:
Do you know how this panic is triggered ? Are you able to
create it on demand ?
no i do not. bring server up and it'll happen in half an hour.
and the server was happy for two months. so i am thinking
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:25:34 +0100 Pete French wrote:
PF Well, I bit the bullet and moved to using hast - all went beautifully,
PF and I migrated the pool with no downtime. The one thing I do notice,
PF however, is that the synchronisation with hast is much slower
PF than the older
To all,
I recently received an older AMD Athlon 64 3400+ machine, 1 GB of RAM and
200 GB of SATA disk. I have installed the 64-bit amd64 version of FBSD
7.3-STABLE on this box and everything is running perfectly.
I have several other smaller, far less powerful 32-bit i386 machines, which
need
on 22/10/2010 17:33 Simon Chang said the following:
But when I exported /usr/src and /usr/obj read-only from the AMD machine and
mounted them through machine-1, and I tried to installkernel from machine-1,
I kept running into errors right at the beginning of the process.
Try the other way
Do you know how this panic is triggered ? Are you able to
create it on demand ?
no i do not. bring server up and it'll happen in half an hour.
and the server was happy for two months. so i am thinking hardware.
Perhaps. The reason I ask is that I had a box go down last night with
the
Just a quick note to say the target schedule for the release of
FreeBSD 7.4 and 8.2 has been worked out. We will be shooting
for a dual release (same target dates for both releases). The
major highlights are:
Freeze: Nov. 28, 2010
BETA1: Dec. 3, 2010
RC1:Dec. 17,
Try the other way around - it's better to run install{kernel,world} on the
same
machine were you did the build.
DESTDIR is your friend too.
--
Andriy Gapon
Andriy,
But if I run installkernel and installworld on the same machine, I won't be
able to install the 32-bit binaries on the slow
on 22/10/2010 19:27 Simon Chang said the following:
Try the other way around - it's better to run install{kernel,world} on
the same
machine were you did the build.
DESTDIR is your friend too.
--
Andriy Gapon
Andriy,
But if I run installkernel and installworld
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 02:46 -0700, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 10/21/10 21:06, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:50:03AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 05:48 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 20/10/2010 21:28 Sean Bruno said the following:
I guess, I could replace the
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 12:06 -0700, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:50:03AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 05:48 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 20/10/2010 21:28 Sean Bruno said the following:
I guess, I could replace the kernel on the CD and have them
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 05:51:03PM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:25:34 +0100 Pete French wrote:
PF Well, I bit the bullet and moved to using hast - all went beautifully,
PF and I migrated the pool with no downtime. The one thing I do notice,
PF however, is that the
From: Mikolaj Golub to.my.troc...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:51:03 +0300
Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:25:34 +0100 Pete French wrote:
PF Well, I bit the bullet and moved to using hast - all went beautifully,
PF and I migrated the pool with
At 11:15 AM 10/22/2010, Randy Bush wrote:
Do you know how this panic is triggered ? Are you able to
create it on demand ?
no i do not. bring server up and it'll happen in half an hour.
and the server was happy for two months. so i am thinking hardware.
Perhaps. The reason I ask is that
I got your point the first time.
The idea is to run installworld on your fast machine. You did everything
correctly for the build, BTW.
I guess that you should be able now to see how to use DESTDIR in that case
:-)
P.S. there is something unconventional about how your mail client handles
Do you know how this panic is triggered ? Are you able to
create it on demand ?
no i do not. bring server up and it'll happen in half an hour.
and the server was happy for two months. so i am thinking hardware.
Perhaps. The reason I ask is that I had a box go down last night with
the
Ok I'll try testing that on some box I can reach with both hands.
fyi nagasaki is:
[r...@nagasaki ~]# uname -a
FreeBSD nagasaki.bogus.com 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #13:
Sun May 30 22:19:23 UTC 2010
r...@nagasaki.bogus.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
[r...@nagasaki ~]#
On
on 22/10/2010 21:51 Simon Chang said the following:
I got your point the first time.
The idea is to run installworld on your fast machine. You did everything
correctly for the build, BTW.
I guess that you should be able now to see how to use DESTDIR in that
case :-)
Note, Warren and I attempted to test this this evening on a 10.04 Ubuntu
box, no crashy-crashy...
-chris
On 10/22/10 16:27, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
Ok I'll try testing that on some box I can reach with both hands.
fyi nagasaki is:
[r...@nagasaki ~]# uname -a
FreeBSD nagasaki.bogus.com
At 08:01 PM 10/22/2010, Chris Morrow wrote:
Note, Warren and I attempted to test this this evening on a 10.04 Ubuntu
box, no crashy-crashy...
I was able to do it, but not the box I expected
4 boxes
(a) Attacking host 2001:db8:1:1/64
(b) victim, not on a connected interface with a). Outside
At 09:11 PM 10/22/2010, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 08:01 PM 10/22/2010, Chris Morrow wrote:
Note, Warren and I attempted to test this this evening on a 10.04 Ubuntu
box, no crashy-crashy...
I was able to trigger the issue on box (c). I was ping6ing box (a)
when I did a hard down of (d)'s
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
on 22/10/2010 21:51 Simon Chang said the following:
I got your point the first time.
The idea is to run installworld on your fast machine. You did
everything
correctly for the build, BTW.
I guess
Odd, can you make any connection between this and the em complaints??
Jack
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote:
At 09:11 PM 10/22/2010, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 08:01 PM 10/22/2010, Chris Morrow wrote:
Note, Warren and I attempted to test this this evening on a
30 matches
Mail list logo
