Re: Xorg in swwrt

2011-02-06 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 03:19:12PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: I updated ports (portmaster -a basically) on this 8.2-PRE box and now I find X takes a long, long time to start up and uses lots of CPU. It shows the wchan as swwrt. eg.. last pid: 21791; load averages: 0.12, 0.29, 0.23

Re: Xorg in swwrt

2011-02-06 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 03:19:12PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: I updated ports (portmaster -a basically) on this 8.2-PRE box and now I find X takes a long, long time to start up and uses lots of CPU. It shows the wchan as swwrt. eg.. last pid: 21791; load averages: 0.12, 0.29, 0.23

Re: FreeBSD 8.2-RC3/7.4-RC3 Available...

2011-02-06 Thread Thomas Steen Rasmussen
On 03.02.2011 23:38, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: On 01/-10/-28163 20:59, Ken Smith wrote: The freebsd-update(8) utility supports binary upgrades of i386 and amd64 systems running earlier FreeBSD releases. Systems running 8.0-RELEASE, 8.1-RELEASE, 8.2-BETA1, 8.2-RC1 or 8.2-RC2 can upgrade as

Re: Xorg in swwrt

2011-02-06 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 11:27:32AM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 03:19:12PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: I updated ports (portmaster -a basically) on this 8.2-PRE box and now I find X takes a long, long time to start up and uses lots of CPU. It shows the wchan as

Re: FreeBSD 8.2-RC3/7.4-RC3 Available...

2011-02-06 Thread Jan Henrik Sylvester
On 02/06/2011 10:30, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote: On 03.02.2011 23:38, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: On 01/-10/-28163 20:59, Ken Smith wrote: The freebsd-update(8) utility supports binary upgrades of i386 and amd64 systems running earlier FreeBSD releases. Systems running 8.0-RELEASE,

Re: Xorg in swwrt

2011-02-06 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 06/02/2011, at 19:57, Kostik Belousov wrote: PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 21787 fiona 1 760 168M 134M swwrt 0 0:04 32.37% Xorg swwrt means waiting for the syncronous swap-out to finish. This is consistent with the top

bridge, ipv6 and rtadvd

2011-02-06 Thread Spil Oss
Hi All, Don't know if this is expected behaviour. My LAN (bge0) and WLAN (wlan0) are bridged in bridge0. I tried to run rtadvd on bridge0 but that didn't result in ipv6 addresses on my network. Tried running rtadvd directly /usr/sbin/rtadvd -c /etc/rtadvd.conf -f -D and saw the requests coming

Re: bridge, ipv6 and rtadvd

2011-02-06 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 06.02.2011 um 13:23 schrieb Spil Oss: Hi All, Don't know if this is expected behaviour. My LAN (bge0) and WLAN (wlan0) are bridged in bridge0. I tried to run rtadvd on bridge0 but that didn't result in ipv6 addresses on my network. Tried running rtadvd directly /usr/sbin/rtadvd -c

(8.2|7.4)-RC3 amd64 bits in place now

2011-02-06 Thread Colin Percival
Hi all, I forgot to upload some of the amd64 RC3 bits to the mirrors earlier. They should be in place now. -- Colin Percival Security Officer, FreeBSD | freebsd.org | The power to serve Founder / author, Tarsnap | tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid

8.1 amd64 lockup (maybe zfs or disk related)

2011-02-06 Thread Greg Bonett
Hi all, I am experiencing hard lockup when running 8.1-RELEASE amd64. The last two times it has happened I was running a zpool scrub (high cpu and io load). /var/log/messages has some errors looking like: kernel: ad0: FAILURE - READ_DMA4 but these didn't seem to correspond to the exact time of

em0 hangs without any messages like Watchdog timeout, only down/up reset it.

2011-02-06 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Freebsd-stable. My em0 (the same, copy'n'paste hardware info from previous mnessage): em0@pci0:0:25:0:class=0x02 card=0x82681043 chip=0x10bd8086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Intel 82566DM Gigabit Ethernet Adapter (82566DM)'

bind 9.6.2 dnssec validation bug

2011-02-06 Thread Russell Jackson
I haven't seen any mention of this anywhere. Are there any plans to update BIND in the 8.1/8.2 branches? https://www.isc.org/announcement/bind-9-dnssec-validation-fails-new-ds-record -- Russell A. Jackson r...@csub.edu Network Analyst California State University, Bakersfield

Re: 8.1 amd64 lockup (maybe zfs or disk related)

2011-02-06 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 01:01:14PM -0800, Greg Bonett wrote: Hi all, I am experiencing hard lockup when running 8.1-RELEASE amd64. The last two times it has happened I was running a zpool scrub (high cpu and io load). /var/log/messages has some errors looking like: kernel: ad0: FAILURE -

Re: bind 9.6.2 dnssec validation bug

2011-02-06 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 05:05:08PM -0800, Russell Jackson wrote: I haven't seen any mention of this anywhere. Are there any plans to update BIND in the 8.1/8.2 branches? https://www.isc.org/announcement/bind-9-dnssec-validation-fails-new-ds-record This was discussed vehemently in December

Re: bind 9.6.2 dnssec validation bug

2011-02-06 Thread Doug Barton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/06/2011 20:58, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: | On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 05:05:08PM -0800, Russell Jackson wrote: | I haven't seen any mention of this anywhere. Are there any plans to | update BIND in the 8.1/8.2 branches? | |

Re: bind 9.6.2 dnssec validation bug

2011-02-06 Thread Russell Jackson
On 02/06/2011 10:16 PM, Doug Barton wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/06/2011 20:58, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: | On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 05:05:08PM -0800, Russell Jackson wrote: | I haven't seen any mention of this anywhere. Are there any plans to | update BIND in the

Re: 8.1 amd64 lockup (maybe zfs or disk related)

2011-02-06 Thread Greg Bonett
Thanks for the response. I have no tunings in /boot/loader.conf according to http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide for amd64 FreeBSD 7.2+ has improved kernel memory allocation strategy and no tuning may be necessary on systems with more than 2 GB of RAM. I have 8GB of ram. do you think this is