On 1 Mar, 2011, at 01:33 , Robert Watson wrote:
Dear all:
Just an FYI that I've gone ahead and merged userspace DTrace support to
FreeBSD 8.x from 9.x. While it appeared to pass build tests locally, boot
and run, etc, this is a non-trivial merge, and it's possible I've messed up.
If
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 11:03:07AM +0200, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On 1 Mar, 2011, at 01:33 , Robert Watson wrote:
Dear all:
Just an FYI that I've gone ahead and merged userspace DTrace support to
FreeBSD 8.x from 9.x. While it appeared to pass build tests locally, boot
and run, etc,
Le Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:26:23 -0500,
Ken Smith kensm...@buffalo.edu a écrit :
Hello,
8.2-RELEASE and 7.4-RELEASE have been announced. The announcement
messages are available here:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.2R/announce.html
There is a small typo in the name of the usb image:
«
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 10:26:07AM +0100, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Le Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:26:23 -0500,
Ken Smith kensm...@buffalo.edu a écrit :
Hello,
8.2-RELEASE and 7.4-RELEASE have been announced. The announcement
messages are available here:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 11:03:07AM +0200, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On 1 Mar, 2011, at 01:33 , Robert Watson wrote:
Dear all:
Just an FYI that I've gone ahead and merged userspace DTrace support to
FreeBSD 8.x from 9.x. While it appeared to pass build tests locally, boot
and run, etc,
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 10:26 +0100, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Le Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:26:23 -0500,
Ken Smith kensm...@buffalo.edu a écrit :
Hello,
8.2-RELEASE and 7.4-RELEASE have been announced. The announcement
messages are available here:
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 02:05 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Not to mention, the block size specified doesn't jibe with what's in the
FreeBSD Handbook (which uses bs=64k):
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-pre.html
Other users have pointed this out to me on my
I have been running with 7.2.2 and so far so good. However, its hard to
say in my case as the box I would only periodically see the issue.
Jan, have you had a chance to try 7.2.2 ? You seemed to hit the issue
the most frequently. There are also some alternate patches in
Hello, Mike.
You wrote 1 марта 2011 г., 17:20:49:
I have been running with 7.2.2 and so far so good. However, its hard to
say in my case as the box I would only periodically see the issue.
As I wrote to Jack, my NIC hangs today with 7.2.2
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov
I had a machine deadlock just now and the only thing on the serial
console was
CPU0: local APIC error 0x40
CPU1: local APIC error 0x40
prior to it hanging. Anyone know what that error is ? Googling didnt
really show much definitive. Someone suggested bad hardware ? Is there
a way to narrow
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 08:50:17PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I had a machine deadlock just now and the only thing on the serial
console was
CPU0: local APIC error 0x40
CPU1: local APIC error 0x40
prior to it hanging. Anyone know what that error is ? Googling didnt
really show much
On 3/1/2011 9:04 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 08:50:17PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I had a machine deadlock just now and the only thing on the serial
console was
CPU0: local APIC error 0x40
CPU1: local APIC error 0x40
The error in question I'm not familiar with, but
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 09:32:58PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 3/1/2011 9:04 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 08:50:17PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I had a machine deadlock just now and the only thing on the serial
console was
CPU0: local APIC error 0x40
CPU1: local
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Lev Serebryakov l...@serebryakov.spb.ru wrote:
Hello, Mike.
You wrote 1 марта 2011 г., 17:20:49:
I have been running with 7.2.2 and so far so good. However, its hard to
say in my case as the box I would only periodically see the issue.
As I wrote to
14 matches
Mail list logo
