RELENG_8: panic: wrong offset 4096 for sectorsize 2352

2011-05-24 Thread Joerg Wunsch
After I recently (finally) upgraded my main machine to RELENG_8, I tried to rip a CD today, using abcde, and got panic: wrong offset 4096 for sectorsize 2352 Any ideas why this happens, and how to avoid it? (I've got a coredump of the kernel, so I could analyze it if someone has got an idea

Re: RELENG_8: panic: wrong offset 4096 for sectorsize 2352

2011-05-24 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 24/05/2011 08:54 Joerg Wunsch said the following: After I recently (finally) upgraded my main machine to RELENG_8, I tried to rip a CD today, using abcde, and got panic: wrong offset 4096 for sectorsize 2352 Any ideas why this happens, and how to avoid it? (I've got a coredump of the

Re: RELENG_8: panic: wrong offset 4096 for sectorsize 2352

2011-05-24 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Andriy Gapon wrote: panic: wrong offset 4096 for sectorsize 2352 Any ideas why this happens, and how to avoid it? Backtrace would be a first thing. OK, here we go (the core has been dumped from within a serial console BREAK DDB entry, I'm omitting the frames related to that): #16

Re: RELENG_8: panic: wrong offset 4096 for sectorsize 2352

2011-05-24 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 24/05/2011 10:26 Joerg Wunsch said the following: As Andriy Gapon wrote: panic: wrong offset 4096 for sectorsize 2352 Any ideas why this happens, and how to avoid it? Backtrace would be a first thing. OK, here we go (the core has been dumped from within a serial console BREAK DDB

Re: RELENG_8: panic: wrong offset 4096 for sectorsize 2352

2011-05-24 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:26:18AM +0200, Joerg Wunsch wrote: As Andriy Gapon wrote: panic: wrong offset 4096 for sectorsize 2352 Any ideas why this happens, and how to avoid it? Backtrace would be a first thing. OK, here we go (the core has been dumped from within a serial

[poll] hyperthreading_allowed, hlt_logical_cpus, mp_watchdog

2011-05-24 Thread Andriy Gapon
I am planning on some changes in head and would like to see if people use the following features: - machdep.hyperthreading_allowed tunable and sysctl - machdep.hlt_logical_cpus tunable and sysctl - mp_watchdog kernel option If you are using any of the above, please let me know - better via a

gpart usage

2011-05-24 Thread Victor Balada Diaz
Hello, I'm trying to setup a MBR partition with a BSD slice in it using gpart on FreeBSD 8.1 RELEASE. From the fixit console in the install i try to do gpart create -s MBR ad0 gpart add -t freebsd ad0 gpart create -s BSD ad0s1 gpart add -t freebsd-ufs ad0s1 gpart set -a active -i 1 ad0 For

Re: [poll] hyperthreading_allowed, hlt_logical_cpus, mp_watchdog

2011-05-24 Thread Ivan Voras
On 24/05/2011 15:21, Andriy Gapon wrote: I am planning on some changes in head and would like to see if people use the following features: - machdep.hyperthreading_allowed tunable and sysctl - machdep.hlt_logical_cpus tunable and sysctl - mp_watchdog kernel option If you are using any of the

Re: gpart usage

2011-05-24 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 24.05.2011 17:20, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: Ie, no 16 sector offset in it. So my question is... What's the proper way of doing a MBR + BSD label partition and where is it documented? what are the different bootcodes and when is needed each one?[1] gptboot is used for GPT scheme. It

Re: gpart usage

2011-05-24 Thread Victor Balada Diaz
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:46:01PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: On 24.05.2011 17:20, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: also, how do i know about offsets each partitioning scheme needs? shouldn't GEOM take care of it without user needing to know anything about it? Usually you do not need to

Re: gpart usage

2011-05-24 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 24.05.2011 19:09, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:46:01PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: On 24.05.2011 17:20, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: also, how do i know about offsets each partitioning scheme needs? shouldn't GEOM take care of it without user needing to know

Re: [poll] hyperthreading_allowed, hlt_logical_cpus, mp_watchdog

2011-05-24 Thread Josh Carroll
Whatever you do, please leave at least some way (at least a tunable) to enable/disable HTT - some workloads are better with, and some without it, and some BIOSes are unreliable in enabling/disabling it :) I noticed that disabling HTT via the machdep.hyperthreading_allowed tunable resulted in

Re: gpart usage

2011-05-24 Thread Victor Balada Diaz
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:05:15PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: On 24.05.2011 19:09, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:46:01PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: On 24.05.2011 17:20, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: also, how do i know about offsets each partitioning scheme

Re: gpart usage

2011-05-24 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 24.05.2011 21:27, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: So the 16 sector offset in BSD label is really needed or isn't? First 8 KBytes of the freebsd partition are reserved for the boot code (/boot/boot). The table of BSD partitions itself is located in the second sector. So, if you plan to create

Re: Bring sio up to 8+

2011-05-24 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 5/22/2011 7:58 AM, Lars Eighner wrote: It seems increasing unlikely that uart will ever support the only internal hardware modem recently available in the US (PR kern/155196), so what are the chances of sio (which works in 7.x reasonably well and better with a one-line hack) being brought

Re: RELENG_8: panic: wrong offset 4096 for sectorsize 2352

2011-05-24 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 24.05.2011 10:53, schrieb Jeremy Chadwick: On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:26:18AM +0200, Joerg Wunsch wrote: As Andriy Gapon wrote: panic: wrong offset 4096 for sectorsize 2352 Any ideas why this happens, and how to avoid it? Backtrace would be a first thing. OK, here we go (the core has