Hi,
I've just upgraded a 8-STABLE box to 9-STABLE (well, just few commits
before it has been tagged as STABLE), which runs from NFS (pxebooted).
It has some IPSec config in ipsec.conf, like this for several boxes:
add 172.28.16.4 172.16.248.2 ah 15704 -A hmac-md5 asdfgh;
add
Dearest In The Lord
The time has come for Christians to worship God in spirit and in truth
according to the book of John chapter 4:vs23-24.But the hour cometh and now is
when the true worshipers shall worship the Father in spirit and in
truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him . God
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 01:46:03PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
Hi,
Hi.
I've just upgraded a 8-STABLE box to 9-STABLE (well, just few commits
before it has been tagged as STABLE), which runs from NFS (pxebooted).
It has some IPSec config in ipsec.conf, like this for several boxes:
Hi,
On 01/04/12 15:51, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
I've just upgraded a 8-STABLE box to 9-STABLE (well, just few commits
before it has been tagged as STABLE), which runs from NFS (pxebooted).
It has some IPSec config in ipsec.conf, like this for several boxes:
add 172.28.16.4
you are right to say you won't be trusted because a lot of false prophets used
the name of God to swindle honest and god fearing citizens. But judgement
belongs only to him. How many people have you sent this scam mail? May God in
his infinite mercy and compassion have forgive you if you are a
Please keep discussions like these away from the mailing list, it's not the
right place for such.
/Christoffer Persson
From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] on
behalf of Agnes Kanah [agnesm...@yahoo.com]
Sent:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 04:17:41PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
[]
#7 0x809bf779 in ipsec_process_done (m=0xfe000c7c7a00,
isr=0xfe001bf54380) at
/data/usr/src/sys/netipsec/ipsec_output.c:170
Here seems to be the problem
Can you do the following (in this
After this change I am recieving the attached error log.
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 04:20:56PM +, John Baldwin wrote:
Author: jhb
Date: Wed Jan 4 16:20:55 2012
New Revision: 229497
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/229497
Log:
MFC 225518,225793,227085:
Allow the ipfw.ko
On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 12:50:38 pm Jason Hellenthal wrote:
After this change I am recieving the attached error log.
My fault, looks like stable/8 doesn't have WITH_INET / WITHOUT_INET.
I'm doing tests on a fix now.
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 04:20:56PM +, John Baldwin wrote:
On 4. Jan 2012, at 18:01 , John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 12:50:38 pm Jason Hellenthal wrote:
After this change I am recieving the attached error log.
My fault, looks like stable/8 doesn't have WITH_INET / WITHOUT_INET.
I'm doing tests on a fix now.
Alternatively I
On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:09:44 pm Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 4. Jan 2012, at 18:01 , John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 12:50:38 pm Jason Hellenthal wrote:
After this change I am recieving the attached error log.
My fault, looks like stable/8 doesn't have
On 4. Jan 2012, at 19:40 , John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:09:44 pm Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 4. Jan 2012, at 18:01 , John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 12:50:38 pm Jason Hellenthal wrote:
After this change I am recieving the attached error log.
My
Hi all, I've noticed that the md5 hashes of a couple of files on
a gmirror change when I recalculate the hashes. The output usually
cycles between 2 hashes per file.
I'm guessing this is because each calculation reads the file
randomly from 1 of 2 component drives, and the files in question
had a
Hello everybody,
I'd like to remind you that only ca. 10 days have left to the status
report submission deadline. Note that we have only received 4 entries so
far. I guess most of the people's holidays have finished by now so I
hope we will receive much more than that by January 15, 2012.
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:16 PM, matt...@phoronix.com wrote:
Thanks.
My request for the person documenting the tunings also runs the benchmark to
ensure expected behaviour.
Why should you have to tune anything ? Did you tune the Oracle Server
install ? If not, you should not have to
Thanks for the comment Arnaud. For comparative benchmarking on
[1]Phoronix.com, Michael inva= riable leaves it in the default
configuration 'in the way the developers or= vendor wanted it for
production'. This is by rule.
However, i= nvariable the community or vendor for
Hmm... No sure what happened there again. What I sent (pulled from my
Sent folder...
===
Thanks for the comment Arnaud. For comparative benchmarking on
Phoronix.com http://Phoronix.com, Michael invariable leaves it in the
default configuration 'in the way the developers or vendor wanted it
Why not compare native builds to tinderbox?
2012/1/4 Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no
Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com writes:
That's not relevant to these errors. For some odd reason tinderbox
takes 1-2 iterations to reach equilibrium when someone makes a data
structure change, even a
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:31:55 -0800
matt...@phoronix.com wrote:
Thanks for the comment Arnaud. For comparative benchmarking
on[1]Phoronix.com, Michael inva configuration 'in the way the
developers or production'. This is by rule. However, i poor
scores on be 'it should be
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:16 PM, matt...@phoronix.com wrote:
Thanks.
My request for the person documenting the tunings also runs the benchmark to
ensure expected behaviour.
Why should you have to tune anything
Greetings everyone,
I was testing DNSSec resolution on BIND 9.8.1-P1 by adding the
following options:
options {
...
dnssec-enable yes;
dnssec-validation auto;
...
};
Unfortunately immediately after named is restarted one CPU reaches
100% utilization.
CPU: 30.1% user, 0.0% nice, 23.6% system,
TB --- 2012-01-04 21:24:08 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-01-04 21:24:08 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2012-01-04 21:24:08 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-01-04 21:25:01 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-01-04 21:25:01 -
TB --- 2012-01-04 22:56:38 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-01-04 22:56:38 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2012-01-04 22:56:38 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-01-04 22:57:14 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-01-04 22:57:14 -
23 matches
Mail list logo
