TB --- 2012-02-03 07:12:50 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-02-03 07:12:50 - starting RELENG_8_2 tinderbox run for
powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2012-02-03 07:12:50 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-02-03 07:13:21 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-02-03
Mike,
For many days now (almost a week?) there have been tinderbox build mails
coming from the sentex.ca build cluster, specific to powerpc, mips, and
sparc64 platforms.
The errors in question are strange and may indicate some kind of
filesystem corruption or equivalent -- I'm really not sure.
TB --- 2012-02-03 08:06:42 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-02-03 08:06:42 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2012-02-03 08:06:42 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-02-03 08:06:42 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-02-03 08:06:42 -
Hi, what would be the best choice?
1. turn off SUJ and dump using -L flag and the turn it on again (but I'm
affraid to destroy the system this way - is this possible?)
2. dump the unmounted partitions with a live cd, per example
Sorry for top posting, mobile mail client problem.
Em 30/01/2012
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 06:45:58AM -0200, Marcel Bonnet wrote:
Hi, what would be the best choice?
1. turn off SUJ and dump using -L flag and the turn it on again (but I'm
affraid to destroy the system this way - is this possible?)
2. dump the unmounted partitions with a live cd, per example
On 2/3/2012 15:45, Marcel Bonnet wrote:
Hi, what would be the best choice?
1. turn off SUJ and dump using -L flag and the turn it on again (but I'm
affraid to destroy the system this way - is this possible?)
Yes, this is what I have done for my 9.0 servers. Unfortunately you
need to be in
On 3 February 2012 08:23, Adam Strohl adam.str...@ateamsystems.com wrote:
On 2/3/2012 17:15, Adam Strohl wrote:
After doing this I have been using dump(8) nightly via cron(8) for about a
week now under 9.0 without issue. Running it on 11 servers currently.
P.S.
To be clear, I am using
On 2/3/2012 17:15, Adam Strohl wrote:
After doing this I have been using dump(8) nightly via cron(8) for
about a week now under 9.0 without issue. Running it on 11 servers
currently.
P.S.
To be clear, I am using dump with -L (snapshots) without issue.
So, I was trying to create a disc witha sector size of 4096 bytes, and I
assumed that simply creating a zvol with that blocksize would do the trick.
But it appears that whatever the blocksize is on the xvol, diskinfo is
reporting the sector size as 512 bytes.
I this the intended behaviour ? I
I'm running FreeBSD 9 on a number of systems and finally decided to take
advantage of the quota system to enforce limits on my users.
No real issues setting it all up aside from finding that
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/quotas.html
needs to be updated. The new
On 2/3/2012 3:48 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Mike,
For many days now (almost a week?) there have been tinderbox build mails
coming from the sentex.ca build cluster, specific to powerpc, mips, and
sparc64 platforms.
Hi,
I will let des@freebsd speak to the errors. We host the boxes
George Mitchell george+free...@m5p.com writes:
Apparently two or three people have all recently checked in code
without first verifying that it compiled (let alone ran), or else
possibly did not completely commit their changes, and then absconded
to a place where they fail to receive these
Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com writes:
For many days now (almost a week?) there have been tinderbox build mails
coming from the sentex.ca build cluster, specific to powerpc, mips, and
sparc64 platforms.
The errors in question are strange and may indicate some kind of
filesystem
On Thursday, February 02, 2012 7:17:14 pm George Mitchell wrote:
On 02/02/12 15:37, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
[... one of three errors it's been reporting repeatedly for days ...]
Talk about a lack of focus! Apparently two or three people have all
recently checked in code without first
On Friday, February 03, 2012 3:48:17 am Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Mike,
For many days now (almost a week?) there have been tinderbox build mails
coming from the sentex.ca build cluster, specific to powerpc, mips, and
sparc64 platforms.
The errors in question are strange and may indicate some
FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org writes:
cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -std=c99 -Wall
-Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign
-fformat-extensions -nostdinc
Kenneth D. Merry schreef:
Hi folks,
The LSI-supported version of the mps(4) driver that supports their 6Gb SAS
HBAs as well as WarpDrive controllers, is now in stable/9 and stable/8.
Please test it out and let me and Kashyap (CCed) know if you run into
any problems.
In addition to supporting
On Fri, February 3, 2012 07:25, Pete French wrote:
So, I was trying to create a disc witha sector size of 4096 bytes, and I
assumed that simply creating a zvol with that blocksize would do the
trick.
But it appears that whatever the blocksize is on the xvol, diskinfo is
reporting the sector
Hi Johan,
I have already figure out this issue in our lab.
I also have fix for this issue. (Just don't want to create regression, that is
why I have not posted outside)
Since you have seen similar issue, It is worth to try my patch.
My machine is not getting IP right now. I will send you patch
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 07:30:54PM +0700, Adam Strohl wrote:
I'm running FreeBSD 9 on a number of systems and finally decided to take
advantage of the quota system to enforce limits on my users.
No real issues setting it all up aside from finding that
AFAIK, there is no way to specify the sector size to use in a ZFS pool: it
is completely automatic when you call zpool create. Ideally it should
query the disk about its sector size and use that, but I don't know if
that has been implemented (and can't be bothered to dig through the source
at
Desai, Kashyap schreef:
Hi Johan,
I have already figure out this issue in our lab.
I also have fix for this issue. (Just don't want to create regression, that is
why I have not posted outside)
Since you have seen similar issue, It is worth to try my patch.
My machine is not getting IP right
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Pete French petefre...@ingresso.co.ukwrote:
So, I was trying to create a disc witha sector size of 4096 bytes, and I
assumed that simply creating a zvol with that blocksize would do the trick.
But it appears that whatever the blocksize is on the xvol, diskinfo
On Fri, February 3, 2012 10:03, Pete French wrote:
[...] But what I am talking about is the sector size
presneted by the 'fake' disc that a ZVOL creates - that always seems
to be 512 bytes, despite the fact that the zvol blocksize is 8k. Seems
odd to me (and that 8k size os alterable, but just
TB --- 2012-02-03 15:07:14 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-02-03 15:07:14 - starting RELENG_8_1 tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2012-02-03 15:07:14 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-02-03 15:07:29 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-02-03 15:07:29 -
Try the following from the zfs(1M) man page:
zfs create [-ps] [-b blocksize] [-o property=value] ... -V size volume
[...]
-b blocksize
Equivalent to -o volblocksize=blocksize. If this option is
specified in conjunction with -o volblocksize, the
You can use the method described here to create a zvol with 4k sector size:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2010-December/010350.html
I saw that, but it describes setting up a zpool, not a zvol - or are
you saying that a zvol created on such a zpool will have 4k sectors ?
On Fri, February 3, 2012 11:05, Pete French wrote:
You can use the method described here to create a zvol with 4k sector
size:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2010-December/010350.html
I saw that, but it describes setting up a zpool, not a zvol - or are
you saying that a zvol
Desai, Kashyap schreef:
Try attached patch.! (This patch is not taken against upstream code, so you may
see some hunk fail.)
~ Kashyap
-Original Message-
From: Johan Hendriks [mailto:joh.hendr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 8:42 PM
To: Desai, Kashyap
Cc: freebsd-stable
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 30/01/2012 13:06, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
For now I've turned off journaling (soft updates seem fine) and that
works around the issue.
Let me know if I can provide more details etc!
I'm not sure, but this may be an
-Original Message-
From: Johan Hendriks [mailto:joh.hendr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 10:02 PM
To: Desai, Kashyap
Cc: freebsd-stable
Subject: Re: LSI supported mps(4) driver in stable/9 and stable/8
Desai, Kashyap schreef:
Try attached patch.! (This patch is
Desai, Kashyap schreef:
-Original Message-
From: Johan Hendriks [mailto:joh.hendr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 10:02 PM
To: Desai, Kashyap
Cc: freebsd-stable
Subject: Re: LSI supported mps(4) driver in stable/9 and stable/8
Desai, Kashyap schreef:
Try attached
-Original Message-
From: Johan Hendriks [mailto:joh.hendr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 10:53 PM
To: Desai, Kashyap
Cc: freebsd-stable
Subject: Re: LSI supported mps(4) driver in stable/9 and stable/8
Desai, Kashyap schreef:
-Original Message-
From:
TB --- 2012-02-03 17:24:15 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-02-03 17:24:15 - starting RELENG_8_2 tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2012-02-03 17:24:15 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-02-03 17:24:23 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-02-03 17:24:23 -
TB --- 2012-02-03 17:50:25 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-02-03 17:50:25 - starting RELENG_8_2 tinderbox run for
powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2012-02-03 17:50:25 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-02-03 17:50:54 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-02-03
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:45:26 -0800
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
Actually all the OP needs to do is to make sure the src tree is up to
date and run mergemaster. I MFC'ed the relevant changes to rc.d/devd
last April.
Strange, my machine was rebuilt later than that (yes, I always run
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:34:10 +0300
Sergey Kandaurov pluk...@gmail.com wrote:
Please apply this patch and report how it goes for you.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/etc/rc.d/devd.diff?r1=1.12;r2=1.13
This is not in 8-STABLE yet.
It looks like it (or almost the same) is here
TB --- 2012-02-03 18:49:49 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-02-03 18:49:49 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2012-02-03 18:49:49 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-02-03 18:50:19 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-02-03 18:50:19 -
TB --- 2012-02-04 01:30:58 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-02-04 01:30:58 - starting RELENG_8_1 tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2012-02-04 01:30:58 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-02-04 01:31:06 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-02-04 01:31:06 -
On 02/03/2012 05:34, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, February 02, 2012 7:17:14 pm George Mitchell wrote:
On 02/02/12 15:37, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
[... one of three errors it's been reporting repeatedly for days ...]
Talk about a lack of focus! Apparently two or three people have all
TB --- 2012-02-04 03:54:57 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-02-04 03:54:57 - starting RELENG_8_2 tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2012-02-04 03:54:57 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-02-04 03:55:06 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-02-04 03:55:06 -
Just because of what I read already is pretty terse I am top-posting for
a reason.
$ su -
# /etc/rc.d/devd stop
# pgrep -l devd (This should show nothing if so kill the results)
# /sbin/devd -D -d (Paste the results)
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 08:41:10PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen
TB --- 2012-02-04 04:13:46 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-02-04 04:13:46 - starting RELENG_8_2 tinderbox run for
powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2012-02-04 04:13:46 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2012-02-04 04:14:14 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2012-02-04
43 matches
Mail list logo
