Installing libpcap from ports does not help. Error message is same.
Running nmap with -dd yield next:
Starting Nmap 6.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2012-06-01 05:42 EEST
Fetchfile found /usr/local/share/nmap/nmap-services
PORTS: Using top 1000 ports found open (TCP:1000, UDP:0, SCTP:0)
Fetchfile
Hello.
On 06/01/2012 05:47, Doug Barton wrote:
On 5/31/2012 12:21 PM, Alexander Pronin wrote:
But, is it suitable to write sh script for 9.0, that does not work in 8.3?
No. Our tools need to work in all supported versions of FreeBSD, which
at this time includes 7 as well.
I see two
On 31.05.12 18:41, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
You missed the bit about 3 reboots, while these don't take 15 mins each,
they're still time consuming and disruptive.
1/ reboot after installing new kernel
2/ reboot after installing new world
3/ reboot after rebuilding ports
About the only time I
On 5/31/12 9:51 PM, Nick Gustas wrote:
On 5/31/2012 12:52 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 5/31/12 6:37 PM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
On 5/31/2012 5:41 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Furthermore, when upgrading the CARP Master firewall, we need to plan
with the Project Manager a failover to the CARP
On 5/31/12 8:13 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 31/05/2012 16:41, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
You missed the bit about 3 reboots, while these don't take 15 mins each,
they're still time consuming and disruptive.
1/ reboot after installing new kernel
2/ reboot after installing new world
3/ reboot
On 6/1/12 8:54 AM, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
On 31.05.12 18:41, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
You missed the bit about 3 reboots, while these don't take 15 mins each,
they're still time consuming and disruptive.
1/ reboot after installing new kernel
2/ reboot after installing new world
3/ reboot
On 01/06/2012 09:16, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
The reason I rebuild the ports last is because, unless I'm wrong, any
port that's statically linked to a system library would be linked to the
old library from the old world.
Uh -- if it's statically linked, then the object code is copied from the
TB --- 2012-06-01 06:08:29 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-01 06:08:29 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.2-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #4: Wed Sep 28 13:48:49 UTC 2011
mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2012-06-01
Hi,
(I'm using FreeBSD 9.0-REL).
ifconfig_em0_ipv6_alias0 doesn't work. I've to use
ifconfig_em0_alias0 for both ipv4 and ipv6.
This is not consequent. My working config
looks like this:
ifconfig_em0=inet 192.168.100.50/28
ifconfig_em0_ipv6=inet6 2a00:abcd:0:405::2/64
ifconfig_em0_alias0=inet
TB --- 2012-06-01 06:34:47 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-01 06:34:47 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.2-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #4: Wed Sep 28 13:48:49 UTC 2011
mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2012-06-01
On 1. Jun 2012, at 09:29 , Thomas Krause wrote:
Hi,
(I'm using FreeBSD 9.0-REL).
ifconfig_em0_ipv6_alias0 doesn't work. I've to use
ifconfig_em0_alias0 for both ipv4 and ipv6.
This is not consequent.
It is actually a lot more consistent now that way than it was ever before.
The reason
There's a nice discussion going on, over at Phoronix.
http://phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?71263
For some reason, they don't seem to like us very much.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On 6/1/2012 17:19, Katinka wrote:
There's a nice discussion going on, over at Phoronix.
http://phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?71263
For some reason, they don't seem to like us very much.
Lots of the comments remind me about Linux vs. Windows in the late 90s,
and taken with a grain of
I think this iterates my point on the Forums.. To gain critical mass
FreeBSD needs to start showing some benchmarks and numbers to back up
the advocacy claims. I think this will also give the dev team
technical direction to get back into grind of tweaking for performance
and not just features.
I
On 6/1/2012 18:03, Jason Leschnik wrote:
I may be totally incorrect with my above ideas, but it's what i would
like to see from FreeBSD *again*... This is the reason in the first
place most people used FreeBSD, stability/scalability/performance are
the hallmarks of FreeBSD. If we have these hard
On 01.06.12 13:19, Katinka wrote:
There's a nice discussion going on, over at Phoronix.
http://phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?71263
For some reason, they don't seem to like us very much.
Do we really care?
The number of really bright people, or even people who are able to
reasonably
Dear Community Members,
It is FreeBSD 9.0 release, system was functioning normal for many months
now. Today I enabled Xserver in /etc/rc.conf
gdm_enable=YES
gnome_enable=YES
After 5 minutes of booting some process start killing the cpu, than
eventually with in 7 minutes, processor get stack
Dear All ,
There is a thread
Why Are You Using FreeBSD ?
I think another thread with the specified subject 'Why Are You NOT Using
FreeBSD ? may be useful :
If you are NOT using FreeBSD for any area or some areas , would you please
list those areas with most important first to least
Hi,
Am 01.06.2012 um 13:48 schrieb Shiv. NK:
Dear Community Members,
It is FreeBSD 9.0 release, system was functioning normal for many months
now. Today I enabled Xserver in /etc/rc.conf
gdm_enable=YES
gnome_enable=YES
After 5 minutes of booting some process start killing the cpu,
Hi!
I think another thread with the specified subject 'Why Are You NOT Using
FreeBSD ? may be useful :
- Exchange (MAPI) and its groupware functionality
I'm eager to test any replacement that will pop up in the ports 8-)
- Windows Terminalserver functionality
- Telephony (ISDN to SIP
On 01-06-2012 13:39, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
Instead, lead by example. Showcase. Demonstrate how superior FreeBSD
is because the people who keep it going are not interested to be the
Jack of All Trades (and master of none). Showcase implementations that
are hard to do with any other OS.
This.
Hi,
Am 01.06.2012 um 13:48 schrieb Shiv. NK:
Dear Community Members,
It is FreeBSD 9.0 release, system was functioning normal for many months
now. Today I enabled Xserver in /etc/rc.conf
gdm_enable=YES
gnome_enable=YES
After 5 minutes of booting some process start killing the cpu,
On 01.06.12 15:15, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
- Telephony (ISDN to SIP gateways, Asterisk etc) -- I know, Hans
Petter Selasky is doing wonderful work in that area, I had no time to
dive into this.
Asterisk (tested up to v 10) works wonderfully on FreeBSD. Mine even
runs in jail. The few gateways
- Original Message -
From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com
If you are NOT using FreeBSD for any area or some areas , would you please
list those areas with most important first to least important last ?
Although we would like to we cant use FreeBSD to run some Linux based
On 06/01/2012 14:15, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
I think another thread with the specified subject 'Why Are You NOT Using
FreeBSD ? may be useful :
- Telephony (ISDN to SIP gateways, Asterisk etc) -- I know,
Hans Petter Selasky is doing wonderful work in that area, I had
no time to dive
On 5/31/2012 5:31 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 31 May 2012, at 22:31, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 31 May 2012 06:42, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
Hey list,
The thread about Why Are You Using FreeBSD, listing the pros and cons
of FBSD, has brought back a topic to mind.
Daniel Kalchev (daniel) writes:
It will sure be interesting to learn what people avoid to use FreeBSD for.
* full virtualization
I am using VirtualBox in production with HAST + ZVOLs, but we need
something like DRBD's dual master mode to be able to do a
Hello list,
Why are /usr/include files installed with install -C during make
installworld when almost everything else is installed without the -C
flag? This makes it harder to track which files were actually
installed during the last make installworld. One can easily find
obsolete files (that
On 06/01/2012 09:12 AM, Phil Regnauld wrote:
Daniel Kalchev (daniel) writes:
It will sure be interesting to learn what people avoid to use FreeBSD for.
* full virtualization
I am using VirtualBox in production with HAST + ZVOLs, but we need
something like
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are NOT using FreeBSD for any area or some areas , would you please
list those areas with most important first to least important last ?
ISDN. This is popular in Germany, but I don't know about
the rest of the world.
We have a
Hi,
The only reason I'm not using FreeBSD for everything (games) is
because it does not support (yet) intel/ati graphic drivers. ;)
Cheers,
Łukasz Gruner
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Dear All ,
There is a thread
Why Are You Using FreeBSD ?
I think another thread with the specified subject 'Why Are You NOT Using
FreeBSD ? may be useful :
If you are NOT using FreeBSD for any area or some areas , would you please
list those areas with most important first to
Hi All,
I did not see the Intel 82599ES chipset in the hardware release notes
for 8.3 or 9.0. Are these controllers supported at this time?
--
Take care
Rick Miller
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
For me it is the lack of support for suspend/resume on laptops. I don't
want to turn off my laptop when I am in the middle of doing something but
need to put the laptop aside. I love using FreeBSD on servers, workstations
and even a computer I have hooked to the TV at home for multimedia purpose,
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 05:03:26 -0700 , Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
Dear All ,
There is a thread
Why Are You Using FreeBSD ?
I think another thread with the specified subject 'Why Are You NOT Using
FreeBSD ? may be useful :
If you are NOT using FreeBSD for any area or some
Yes, it is supported in the ixgbe driver.
Jack
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Rick Miller vmil...@hostileadmin.comwrote:
Hi All,
I did not see the Intel 82599ES chipset in the hardware release notes
for 8.3 or 9.0. Are these controllers supported at this time?
--
Take care
Rick
Thanks, Jack!
Also another support question for the listsIs the Broadcom BCM5719
supported? I can find neither in the hardware notes for 8.3 nor 9.0.
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, it is supported in the ixgbe driver.
Jack
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012
On 06/01/12 13:06, Rick Miller wrote:
Thanks, Jack!
Also another support question for the listsIs the Broadcom BCM5719
supported? I can find neither in the hardware notes for 8.3 nor 9.0.
man bge
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Thanks, Michael!
I took a look at the manpage and it does appear that it is supported
by the bge driver. It also states that the 572x controller is also
supported, but I heard a rumor stating that the BCM5720 in particular
did not work even though the manpage indicates it is supported. I was
Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com writes:
Why are /usr/include files installed with install -C during make
installworld when almost everything else is installed without the -C
flag? This makes it harder to track which files were actually
installed during the last make installworld. One can
On 06/01/2012 11:59 AM, Chris Nehren wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 05:03:26 -0700 , Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
Dear All ,
There is a thread
Why Are You Using FreeBSD ?
I think another thread with the specified subject 'Why Are You NOT Using
FreeBSD ? may be useful :
If you are NOT
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 05:03:26AM -0700, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
If you are NOT using FreeBSD for any area or some areas , would you please
list those areas with most important first to least important last ?
As mentioned by several others, once you have a single applicaiton
that
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 10:45 -0700, Rick Miller wrote:
BCM5720
I haven't gotten this working on my Dell R620 via bge(4), but we are
actively working on it.
Sean
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 13:56:45 -0400 , Michael R. Wayne wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 05:03:26AM -0700, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
If you are NOT using FreeBSD for any area or some areas , would you please
list those areas with most important first to least important last ?
As
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-stable-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com writes:
Why are /usr/include files installed with install -C during make
installworld when almost everything else is installed without the -C
flag? This makes it
TB --- 2012-06-01 15:24:58 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-01 15:24:58 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.2-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #4: Wed Sep 28 13:48:49 UTC 2011
mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2012-06-01
There's a nice discussion going on, over at Phoronix.
http://phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?71263
For some reason, they don't seem to like us very much.
ALL of the PC performance weenies run Windows. They're totally stupid when
it comes to software and all they care about is the Windows
TB --- 2012-06-01 15:59:08 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-01 15:59:08 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.2-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #4: Wed Sep 28 13:48:49 UTC 2011
mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2012-06-01
We used to have FreeBSD exclusively on desktops...
Now, we have migrated to other desktops (mac) with FreeBSD running
the build and file server...
Why?
Because - the mac updates itself! No pain, no installation,
no keeping-up with mailing lists/announcements, just click and its done.
Mac OS
On 1 June 2012 16:20, Nomen Nescio nob...@dizum.com wrote:
Dear All ,
There is a thread
Why Are You Using FreeBSD ?
I think another thread with the specified subject 'Why Are You NOT Using
FreeBSD ? may be useful :
If you are NOT using FreeBSD for any area or some areas , would you
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 08:32:08PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
On 1 June 2012 16:20, Nomen Nescio nob...@dizum.com wrote:
Dear All ,
There is a thread
Why Are You Using FreeBSD ?
I think another thread with the specified subject 'Why Are You NOT Using
FreeBSD ? may be useful :
On 6/1/12 1:57 PM, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
We used to have FreeBSD exclusively on desktops...
Now, we have migrated to other desktops (mac) with FreeBSD running
the build and file server...
Why?
Because - the mac updates itself! No pain, no installation,
no keeping-up with mailing
On 6/1/2012 1:57 PM, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
One developer here uses Linux Debian for about the same reason,
it's trivial to update (via the network) to new versions, etc...
FWIW, there is freebsd-update(8) now for binary updating of base, and
pkgng[1] will allow binary upgrading of
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 14:50:22 -0500 , Bryan Drewery wrote:
FWIW, there is freebsd-update(8) now for binary updating of base, and
pkgng[1] will allow binary upgrading of packages/ports similar to apt-get.
[1] http://wiki.freebsd.org/pkgng
The thing that really has me attracted to pkgng is
In message ca+7wwsewnfre8xz3h5huhww78yaxv7dkmyaivzamoy4kuz1...@mail.gmail.com
, Kimmo Paasiala writes:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-stable-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com writes:
Why are /usr/include files installed with install -C
Hi all,
Am 01.06.2012 um 14:03 schrieb Mehmet Erol Sanliturk:
[...]
If you are NOT using FreeBSD for any area or some areas , would you please
list those areas with most important first to least important last ?
We are using two FreeBSD-Servers as a SAMBA-Server and as a plot-server, partly
On Jun 1, 2012, at 09:12, Phil Regnauld wrote:
* Gluster
For very large FSes, nothing beats it, especially now that 3.3 has been
released.
Isilon built their OneFS on top of FreeBSD, does that count? :)
Panasas too IIRC.
___
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com writes:
If you are NOT using FreeBSD for any area or some areas , would you please
list those areas with most important first to least important last ?
1) I don't use FreeBSD for virtualization as the host OS. I really want
to, becaus I want to be
Lars Engels lars.eng...@0x20.net writes:
I guess he made his experiences with that some years ago when support
for amd64 in the ports was not very mature. But this has changed since
then, apart from a few ports almost all of them should work on amd64
without problems.
I can vouch for this. I
On Jun 1, 2012, at 08:33, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
For example if one wants an e-mail server, that is better served in the long
run by IMAP+MTA than any form of Exchange, because you are not tied to one
single platform and that vendor's lunacy. Otherwise FreeBSD runs just fine as
server for
David Magda (dmagda) writes:
On Jun 1, 2012, at 09:12, Phil Regnauld wrote:
* Gluster
For very large FSes, nothing beats it, especially now that 3.3 has been
released.
Isilon built their OneFS on top of FreeBSD, does that count? :)
Panasas too IIRC.
Good
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 05:12:14PM -0700, Dave Hayes wrote:
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com writes:
If you are NOT using FreeBSD for any area or some areas , would you please
list those areas with most important first to least important last ?
1) I don't use FreeBSD for
On Jun 1, 2012 5:34 PM, David Magda dma...@ee.ryerson.ca wrote:
On Jun 1, 2012, at 08:33, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
For example if one wants an e-mail server, that is better served in the
long run by IMAP+MTA than any form of Exchange, because you are not tied to
one single platform and that
,--- Dave Hayes (Fri, 01 Jun 2012 17:12:14 -0700) *
| 2) I don't use FreeBSD for a 'modern' desktop. By 'modern' I mean
| areas which most rank and file users would need: day-to-day non
| technical browsing with flash, applications like skype, syncing to
| mobile devices, etc.
First, two
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 15:12:36 +0200 , Phil Regnauld wrote:
* full virtualization
I am using VirtualBox in production with HAST + ZVOLs, but we need
something like DRBD's dual master mode to be able to do a teleport of
the
instance like Ganeti does
On 6/1/2012 5:14 PM, Dave Hayes wrote:
Lars Engelslars.eng...@0x20.net writes:
I guess he made his experiences with that some years ago when support
for amd64 in the ports was not very mature. But this has changed since
then, apart from a few ports almost all of them should work on amd64
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 09:18:55PM +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-stable-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com writes:
Why are /usr/include files installed with install -C during make
installworld ??when
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 07:43:17AM +0300, Andrey S. Rybak wrote:
Installing libpcap from ports does not help. Error message is same.
Running nmap with -dd yield next:
Starting Nmap 6.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2012-06-01 05:42 EEST
Fetchfile found /usr/local/share/nmap/nmap-services
PORTS:
Hi,
On 30 May 2012 PM 7:20:31 David Chisnall wrote:
This is off-topic, so please feel free to disregard it, but I'm sending it to
this list in the hope that it will reach a largish number of users.
I am currently looking at updating some of our advocacy material (which
advertises
On Jun 1, 2012, at 21:03, Chris Nehren wrote:
You say your'e using ZVOLs but then recommend gluster for large
filesystems. I would like to take a moment to point out that one of the
design goals of ZFS was to scale beyond the capabilities of current
hardware.
What does gluster do that ZFS
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:14:10PM -0400, David Magda wrote:
ZFS is for storing file systems on locally connected block devices.
Gluster is a network file system where data can be distributed over
many nodes.
Pardon my ignorance to not knowing what gluster is, but is this
conceptually
Hi,
On 01 June 2012 AM 5:03:26 Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
Why Are You Using FreeBSD ?
there is only one reason for me not using FreeBSD: hardware which is not
supported but found in the machine.
I have had to move two machines within the last three years to Fedora because
of this. The
So ZFS can ensure that bits-on-disk stay safe through checksums and mirroring
/ RAIDZ, while Gluster allows entire file servers to go offline and the files
are still accessible because you have a kind of network-level RAID going on.
This also helps in performance since instead of clients
On 1 June 2012 23:33, Zach Leslie xaque...@gmail.com wrote:
So ZFS can ensure that bits-on-disk stay safe through checksums and
mirroring / RAIDZ, while Gluster allows entire file servers to go offline
and the files are still accessible because you have a kind of network-level
RAID going
TB --- 2012-06-02 00:42:59 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-02 00:42:59 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.2-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #4: Wed Sep 28 13:48:49 UTC 2011
mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2012-06-02
On Jun 1, 2012 8:27 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:14:10PM -0400, David Magda wrote:
ZFS is for storing file systems on locally connected block devices.
Gluster is a network file system where data can be distributed over
many nodes.
Pardon my
On 02.06.2012, at 03:06, David Magda dma...@ee.ryerson.ca wrote:
On Jun 1, 2012, at 08:33, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
For example if one wants an e-mail server, that is better served in the long
run by IMAP+MTA than any form of Exchange, because you are not tied to one
single platform and that
TB --- 2012-06-02 01:12:40 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-06-02 01:12:40 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.2-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #4: Wed Sep 28 13:48:49 UTC 2011
mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2012-06-02
On 02.06.2012, at 07:19, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
Glustre sits above the storage system, replicating data between systems.
So, disks -- ZFS (via Zvols) -- Glustre.
How is this different than ZFS using remote zvols via iSCSI? Can it tolerate
down nodes better than ZFS?
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 05:20:39PM +0200, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Maybe FreeBSD should consider migrating to pkgsrc?
I'm not arguing that your other points are invalid (in particular,
I agree that the xorg change was really painful, and for a long time
amd64 lagged i386 badly), but there is one very
80 matches
Mail list logo
