Do you aware that if wget tries download from https, and there is
self-signed certificate, then it fails, and ask for --no-check-certificate
option?
How do your patch deal in that case?
2012/11/27 Luca Ferrari fluca1...@infinito.it
Hi all,
I was in trouble for a while because I was using
Am Tue, 27 Nov 2012 10:22:09 +0200
schrieb Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.com:
Do you aware that if wget tries download from https, and there is
self-signed certificate, then it fails, and ask for
--no-check-certificate option?
How do your patch deal in that case?
So portsnap and
Sorry, back to list.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you aware that if wget tries download from https, and there is
self-signed certificate, then it fails, and ask for --no-check-certificate
option?
How do your patch deal in that case?
It
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:22:09AM +0200, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
Do you aware that if wget tries download from https, and there is
self-signed certificate, then it fails, and ask for --no-check-certificate
option?
How do your patch deal in that case?
2012/11/27 Luca Ferrari
If it is really mandatory on i386, why there is option at all?
According to man, while apic is mandatory on amd64 there
is no corresponding config or NOTES entry.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Help-review-the-FAQ-tp5762326p5764584.html
Sent from the
I did a little review and now it is possible to specify to use wget or
not using the portsnap.conf file, as well as the option to ingore
certificate checking even if I don't believe this is correct.
Therefore portsnap with this patch could work with either wget or
phttpget, even if I'm not able to
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Luca Ferrari fluca1...@infinito.it wrote:
I did a little review and now it is possible to specify to use wget or
not using the portsnap.conf file, as well as the option to ingore
certificate checking even if I don't believe this is correct.
Therefore portsnap
On 11/27/12 00:24, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:13:47AM -0500, Richard Kuhns wrote:
On 11/21/12 21:08, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:49:21AM +0900, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 02:59:34PM -0500, Richard Kuhns wrote:
On 11/20/12 03:52,
Hi guys,
I can't see virtio in releng/9.1, is there any particular reason why it
isn't going to be included given that it works reasonable well (and is
optional anyway, so not likely to be detrimental)?
Thanks,
Joe
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 08:52 +0100, Luca Ferrari wrote:
Now the question is: should this patch, or better the idea of using
wget or another alike substitute to phttpget, be integrated into the
system?
I've tested it on FreeBSD-9-STABLE.
Certainly not with a dependency on wget, which is not
On 27 November 2012 22:12, Joe Holden li...@rewt.org.uk wrote:
Hi guys,
I can't see virtio in releng/9.1, is there any particular reason why it
isn't going to be included given that it works reasonable well (and is
optional anyway, so not likely to be detrimental)?
virtio appeared in
Hello list,
I have the following question : I have several machines with 196G of RAM that
are using
RELENG_9 with ZFS, and are running a very memory intensive java applications -
ElasticSearch
The machines are without swap configured and have vm.swap_enabled=0 in
/etc/sysctl.conf.
The
Read any ZFS tuning manual on the web, including the ones direct from
SUN/Oracle, and they all list:
- if you are running processes that need a lot of memory, then limit the
ARC to allow the apps to have access to that memory
:)
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Nikolay Denev nde...@gmail.com
- if you are running processes that need a lot of memory, then limit the
ARC to allow the apps to have access to that memory
And this is what Nikolay did after the incident apparently. The question
was more like:
Shouldn't the OS release this memory automatically when it's starved as
opposed
On 27/11/2012 19:25, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 27 November 2012 22:12, Joe Holden li...@rewt.org.uk wrote:
Hi guys,
I can't see virtio in releng/9.1, is there any particular reason why it
isn't going to be included given that it works reasonable well (and is
optional anyway, so not likely to
On Nov 27, 2012, at 3:49 PM, Joe Holden li...@rewt.org.uk wrote:
On 27/11/2012 19:25, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 27 November 2012 22:12, Joe Holden li...@rewt.org.uk wrote:
Hi guys,
I can't see virtio in releng/9.1, is there any particular reason why it
isn't going to be included given
I've got an Intel server motherboard with 4x igb (and 1x em) on it.
The motherboard in question is the S3420GPRX and the IGB's show up as:
igb0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection version - 2.3.4 port
0x3020-0x303f mem 0xb1b2-0xb1b3,0xb1bc4000-0xb1bc7fff irq 19
at device 0.0 on pci3
Hello.
I recently upgraded to 9.1-RC3, everything went fine, however the / partition
its about to get full. Im really new to FreeBSD so I don’t know what files can
be deleted safely.
# find -x / -size +1 -exec du -h {} \;
16M/boot/kernel/kernel
60M/boot/kernel/kernel.symbols
6.7M
I'd delete (or move):
/boot/kernel.old1
And if you need more space:
/boot/kernel.old
I don't know about the following:
/compat/linux/usr/lib/locale/locale-archive.tmpl
As for the rest, leave it (note: /rescue/* are not really separate files but
hard-links to /rescue/rescue).
--
Devin
On
A further update to my problem: it only seems to occur when there is
largely traffic out ie: the window is active with ... but typing in
the window seems to prevent the effect.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Something in your environment, have lots of users with this driver in very
demanding
environments and I have not been seeing reports of this sort.
Jack
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.comwrote:
I've got an Intel server motherboard with 4x igb (and 1x em) on
On 27.11.2012 23:27, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
I've got an Intel server motherboard with 4x igb (and 1x em) on it.
The motherboard in question is the S3420GPRX and the IGB's show up as:
igb0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection version - 2.3.4 port
0x3020-0x303f mem
Hi,
- Original Message -
From: Joe Holden li...@rewt.org.uk
To: Sergey Kandaurov pluk...@gmail.com
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 2:49:07 PM
Subject: Re: virtio for 9.1-R
On 27/11/2012 19:25, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 27 November 2012 22:12, Joe
-Mensaje original-
From: Efraín Déctor
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 5:45 PM
To: Devin Teske
Subject: Re: How to clean up /
Thank you very much, it worked.
-Mensaje original-
From: Devin Teske
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 5:03 PM
To: Efraín Déctor
Cc:
On 27/11/2012 23:22, Bryan Venteicher wrote:
Hi,
- Original Message -
From: Joe Holden li...@rewt.org.uk
To: Sergey Kandaurov pluk...@gmail.com
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 2:49:07 PM
Subject: Re: virtio for 9.1-R
On 27/11/2012 19:25, Sergey
To Jack Vogel's comment, this problem only seems to occur on systems
that are exceedingly lightly loaded (in this case, not yet in
production and I'm the only one using it).
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org wrote:
r243570 in CURRENT should likely fix this
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 08:34:13AM -0500, Richard Kuhns wrote:
On 11/27/12 00:24, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:13:47AM -0500, Richard Kuhns wrote:
On 11/21/12 21:08, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:49:21AM +0900, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21,
Quoth =?utf-8?Q?Efra=C3=ADn_D=C3=A9ctor?= efraindec...@motumweb.com:
Hello.
I recently upgraded to 9.1-RC3, everything went fine, however the /
partition its about to get full. Im really new to FreeBSD so I don’t
know what files can be deleted safely.
76M
I have a custom kernel on this system (for using IPFW) could be this reason
so compat is there?.
Thank you
-Mensaje original-
From: Ben Morrow
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 6:53 PM
To: efraindec...@motumweb.com ; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: How to clean up /
Quoth
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.comwrote:
To Jack Vogel's comment, this problem only seems to occur on systems
that are exceedingly lightly loaded (in this case, not yet in
production and I'm the only one using it).
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Andre
At 7PM -0600 on 27/11/12 Efraín Déctor wrote:
From: Ben Morrow
Quoth =?utf-8?Q?Efra=C3=ADn_D=C3=A9ctor?= efraindec...@motumweb.com:
I recently upgraded to 9.1-RC3, everything went fine, however the /
partition its about to get full. Im really new to FreeBSD so I don’t
know what files
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 02:11:05AM +, Ben Morrow wrote:
Probably the latter is the easier option. /usr is the right filesystem
to be storing this sort of thing on, so you want to
mv /compat /usr
ln -s usr/compat /compat
The mv will take some time, since it is moving files
On 11/27/2012 5:27 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
I've got an Intel server motherboard with 4x igb (and 1x em) on it.
The motherboard in question is the S3420GPRX and the IGB's show up as:
igb0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection version - 2.3.4 port
0x3020-0x303f mem
--- On Tue, 11/27/12, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: 9.1-RC3 IGB dropping connections.
To: Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org
Cc: FreeBSD Hackers freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Stable
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote:
Are you using pf ? Also, did you confirm it is the igb nic and not
something more general ? e.g. if you put in a different nic, does the
problem go away ?
No pf, the motherboard em-driver NIC does not have this problem.
In
35 matches
Mail list logo
