on 01/07/2013 21:50 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
The issue is that ZFS on FreeBSD is still young compared to other
filesystems (specifically UFS).
That's a fact.
Nothing is perfect, but FFS/UFS tends
to have a significantly larger number of bugs worked out of it to the
point where
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 08:59:56AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 01/07/2013 21:50 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
The issue is that ZFS on FreeBSD is still young compared to other
filesystems (specifically UFS).
That's a fact.
Nothing is perfect, but FFS/UFS tends
to have a
Hi Cris,
Do you still have the following file: /boot/zfs/zpool.cache ?
I guess that with the kernel upgrade you have just replaced that :)
This is the file that you can create with:
zpool set cachefile=/boot/zfs/zpool.cache pool name
Regards,
Ivailo Tanusheff
-Original Message-
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 12:57:16AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
But in the OP's case, the situation sounds dire given the limitations --
limitations that someone (apparently not him) chose, which greatly
hinder debugging/troubleshooting. Had a heterogeneous setup been
chosen, the
