On 09/04/2013 08:25 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
Q: does the copper (10G Based T) version work?
Works fine for me.
Nice to know,
danke,
danny
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Yeah this is the same conclusion I came to in essence of anything existing.
I'm going to hit up the freebsd-drivers list however and see where I end up
after that. The cards might wind up in the garbage can or sold off cheap
unfortunately if I can't get them functional with FreeBSD, which is
Hi,
I'm seeing extremely high CPU usage withssh-st the new nfsd:
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND
2280 root 1020 9932K 1376K *nfs_c 0 320:11 100.00% nfsd{nfsd:
service}
2280 root 1020 9932K 1376K CPU77 319:47 100.00%
Lars Eggert wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing extremely high CPU usage withssh-st the new nfsd:
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU
COMMAND
2280 root 1020 9932K 1376K *nfs_c 0 320:11 100.00%
nfsd{nfsd: service}
2280 root 1020 9932K 1376K
Am 11.09.2013 12:09, schrieb Ryan McIntosh:
Yeah this is the same conclusion I came to in essence of anything
existing.
I'm going to hit up the freebsd-drivers list however and see where I
end up
after that. The cards might wind up in the garbage can or sold off
cheap
unfortunately if I can't
Rick
Would this affect 9.2-RCn ?
---
Mark saad | mark.s...@longcount.org
On Sep 11, 2013, at 7:54 AM, Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote:
Lars Eggert wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing extremely high CPU usage withssh-st the new nfsd:
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME
Thanks, I will watch out for the MFC and test.
Lars
On Sep 11, 2013, at 13:54, Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote:
Lars Eggert wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing extremely high CPU usage withssh-st the new nfsd:
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU
COMMAND
2280 root
11.09.2013 18:07, Jimmy Olgeni wrote:
Perhaps I found something weird while running 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD
9.2-RC3 #0 r255393 (ZFS-only setup).
Unfortunately I'm not able to get a minidump for the latest RC, but at this
point I suspect that something is going on with glib20 and kqueue on both
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 05:07:10PM +0200, Jimmy Olgeni wrote:
- However, this time I managed to get a minidump from the old -STABLE. I
saved it here:
http://olgeni.olgeni.com/~olgeni/core.txt.0
Could you list the lines around the the vfs_subr.c:4591 in your kernel ?
Also, do you have
On Tuesday, September 10, 2013 10:50:55 am Marko Cupać wrote:
My 9.2-PRERELEASE #0 r254557 amd64 just dumped core on shutdown. I
updated src to Last Changed Rev: 255395 two days ago but did not get
to rebuild worldkernel. Also I did not rebuild any ports since.
Virtualbox was not running.
Hi,
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Could you list the lines around the the vfs_subr.c:4591 in your kernel ?
4591 is the VI_LOCK(vp) in filt_vfsvnode:
static int
filt_vfsvnode(struct knote *kn, long hint)
{
struct vnode *vp = (struct vnode *)kn-kn_hook;
int
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
Can you try to build world WITH_CLANG_IS_CC? Clang generated code is known to
produce an instant coredump in situations where gcc generated code hits a
loop or becomes unresponsive.
I removed ccache, rebuilt with WITH_CLANG_IS_CC and it worked
Hello,
Dig can't be linked if WITH_BIND_XML=yes is added to /etc/src.conf.
[root@morzine src]# svn info
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src
URL: http://svn.restart.bel/svn-FreeBSD-base/stable/9
Relative URL: ^/stable/9
Repository Root: http://svn.restart.bel/svn-FreeBSD-base
Repository
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
11.09.2013 18:07, Jimmy Olgeni wrote:
Perhaps I found something weird while running 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD
9.2-RC3 #0 r255393 (ZFS-only setup).
Unfortunately I'm not able to get a minidump for the latest RC, but at this
point I suspect that
Hello,
Perhaps I found something weird while running 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD
9.2-RC3 #0 r255393 (ZFS-only setup).
Quick history of the problem:
- Lately, using a very recent -STABLE, the host would hang randomly while
building ports with poudriere (-J2) and using X11, without producing a
core
Hi,
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Also, do you have all options listed at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-deadlocks.html
enabled ?
This time I tried with clang + these options and I got something more
interesting. All works
Mark Saad wrote:
Rick
Would this affect 9.2-RCn ?
Yes (and 9.2 when it is released). If the CPU overheads
(same as 9.0, 9.1) are an issue for your server, you can
apply the patch or switch to the old nfs server or disable
the DRC for TCP by editting the sources and setting
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 11:11:24 -0400
John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Is this reproducible?
It happened a few times before (maybe 3-4 times this year), but I can't
reproduce it intentionally.
--
Marko Cupać
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
18 matches
Mail list logo
