On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 14:31:35 +, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Ian Smith wrote:
> > Like yourself, I think this is far from 'cosmetic' as is oft suggested,
> > especially in some fairly ill-informed forum posts but also various list
> > posts.
On 26.12.2015 17:09, Ian Smith wrote:
> Current hypothesis: some variable/s are getting improperly initialised
> at boot, but are (somehow?) getting properly re-initialised on changing
> cpuset to 1 then back to 2 cpus - though I've no idea how, or by what.
While this is interesting hypothesis,