On 6/22/20, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 22.06.2020 3:56, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>
>> One of the upstream problems is that there is not really any
>> authoritative performance regression log being built up, so it is hard
>> to see where such regressions were introduced. Somebody then has to
>> spend a
On 2020-06-22 16:56, Andrea Brancatelli via freebsd-stable wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> Disclaimer:
>
> I'm not very sure this is the best place to ask, in case feel free to
> point me in the right direction.
>
> Given this,
>
> I have an old 10.3 machine with sendmail 8.15.2 that's been
22.06.2020 21:56, Andrea Brancatelli via freebsd-stable wrote:
> I have an old 10.3 machine with sendmail 8.15.2 that's been working ok
> for a long time.
>
> We have a simple mailterable rule that looks like:
>
> schema31.itdbmail-lmtpd[10.33.whatever]
>
> That we use to forward mail
22.06.2020 3:56, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> One of the upstream problems is that there is not really any
> authoritative performance regression log being built up, so it is hard
> to see where such regressions were introduced. Somebody then has to
> spend a lot of time tracking down each and every
Hello everybody,
Disclaimer:
I'm not very sure this is the best place to ask, in case feel free to
point me in the right direction.
Given this,
I have an old 10.3 machine with sendmail 8.15.2 that's been working ok
for a long time.
We have a simple mailterable rule that looks like:
Dimitry Andric wrote:
>
> On 21 Jun 2020, at 14:36, Chris Nehren wrote:
>> On Sunday, June 21, 2020 8:11:15 AM EDT Michael Grimm wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am following FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE.
>>>
>>> Clang has been upgraded to version 10.0.0 on May, 1st, and ever since that
>>> time, I do
