drive or a problem with
cabling.
No /boot/loader
Default: 0:ad(0,ad)/boot/kernel/kernel
I lose my system?
What can i do?
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
on 27/04/2009 20:49 Jaakko Heinonen said the following:
On 2009-04-27, Andriy Gapon wrote:
fsck(8) describes -C option, fsck mentions this option in its usage
message, but:
$ fsck -C
fsck_ufs: illegal option -- C
usage: fsck_ufs [-BCFpfny] [-b block] [-c level] [-m mode] filesystem ...
Am
Any ideas, interest?
I still have the core file.
on 20/04/2009 13:04 Andriy Gapon said the following:
System is stable/7: 7.2-PRERELEASE r191214 i386 uni-processor.
NFS mount options: ro,noauto,nfsv3,tcp,intr,rdirplus,-r=32768,-w=32768
The panic occurred on client after losing
/i386/exception.s:255
I am not sure why rep parameter shows up as NULL in nfs_connect_unlock
call. In frame 4:
(kgdb) p/x rep-r_nmp-nm_state
$2 = 0x1010
I am keeping the core file.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
. So this could be configurable.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
, was this really a question for stable ml?
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
My account:
amd64 stable/7 system
4GB RAM
zero tuning
3-way mirrored zpool with individual dev size about 400G
moderate load
sufficient remaining RAM (still plenty)
zero troubles (system age is 2 months)
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
) mode for such purposes:
http://www.coreboot.org/EHCI_Debug_Port
But that requires some special HW in addition to SW support which our doesn't
have.
BTW, Ronald, it is possible that you might have a serial header on motherboard
which is not connected to any traditional port.
--
Andriy Gapon
header is not an obvious one and you would need a special connector for
it.
The port can also be disabled in BIOS.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
systemDEVFS;
match subsystem CDEV;
match cdev ^da[0-9]+$;
action echo 't120o3l32 bc+f+16' /dev/speaker;
};
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
of ideas.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
on 26/02/2009 18:27 Paul B. Mahol said the following:
On 2/26/09, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
I see something unusual and surprising for me: if I kldload aio for qemu's
sake
and then actually start qemu, I see that share of C2 in cx_usage is
constantly
dropping and then finally
on 05/02/2009 16:34 Andriy Gapon said the following:
I have an NFS server and NFS client separated by a firewall. Both
servers are FreeBSD 7.1.
Server configuration:
nfs_server_enable=YES
nfs_server_flags=-t -n 4
rpcbind_enable=YES
mountd_flags=-r -p 737
mountd_enable=YES
The firewall
mountd udp port allowed in the firewall?
Or is there a way to configure everything to tcp only?
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd
on 28/01/2009 21:22 Andrew Snow said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
Previously I heard about problems with hardware running hot, but not
with it being cold. I put the word in quotes, because the system is in
a room with normal room temperature.
Any guesses what hardware part might
on 24/01/2009 13:00 Andriy Gapon said the following:
[snip]
Additional info:
I recently added some new memory to this system.
The memory survived several passes of memtest86 before booting to
FreeBSD. It also survived one pass after the incident.
Still I wouldn't exclude a possibility
on, like network stack or ata subsystem, etc.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
have any check where the panic occurred?
About the code that called destroy_dev(): it created cdev probably too
early, failed to allocate some system resource, so it went to destroy
the newly created cdev. Non-null cdevsw was definitely provided to make_dev.
--
Andriy Gapon
to kernel, ata driver at
least), PCI bus speed will stay limited to the same old value.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable
on 13/01/2009 02:34 Andrew Snow said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
To me it seems like fsck_y passes suboptimal flags to fsck, it doesn't
have to examine each and every filesystem in fstab.
I think think this is because it does a quick check first to see if it
can run the fsck
, it doesn't
have to examine each and every filesystem in fstab.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
on 21/11/2008 15:14 Andriy Gapon said the following:
I wasn't sure where this belongs, so writing here.
This is stable/7 on Intel DG33TL:
$ pciconf -lv
...
atap...@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x01018f card=0x610111ab chip=0x610111ab
rev=0xb2 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Marvell Semiconductor
from ZFS, so /etc/exports would never be used.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
on 10/01/2009 17:11 Garrett Cooper said the following:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua wrote:
$ /etc/rc.d/mountd onestart
/etc/rc.d/mountd: WARNING: /etc/exports is not readable.
Exit 1
Actually /etc/exports did not exist at all.
And this was not a WARNING
reboot in 15 seconds - press a
key on the console to abort
I guess the large size of the dump is because of the ZFS but I wonder
why enough room for the dump could not be found.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
on 04/12/2008 12:31 Andriy Gapon said the following:
I've just realized that I see in releng/7 something that I did not see
in releng/6 - even if I use a file with custom rules in firewall_type I
still get default loopback rules installed.
I think that this is not correct, I am using custom
. all deny rules come with
log logamount xxx).
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 28/11/2008 16:28 Andriy Gapon said the following:
uname:
FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE r185311 amd64
dmesg:
ichwd0: Intel ICH9R watchdog timer on isa0
ichwd0: Intel ICH9R watchdog timer (ICH9 or equivalent)
ichwd0: timer disabled
pciconf:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:31:0: class=0x060100 card
on 21/11/2008 19:15 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 21/11/2008 18:48 Gavin Atkinson said the following:
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 17:16 +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
As Andriy Gapon wrote:
Now:
(0x44 1) 0xff == (0xc4 1) 0xff = 0x88 (looks like RTC)
(0x50 1) 0xff == (0xd0 1) 0xff
seconds.
Not sure how to explain this.
I think I've seen some changes to reduce memory usage of loader, I will
try them to see if that would make any difference for my situation.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
reloded messages are no longer produced.
And there are no other messages.
But nothing happens for many minutes that I waited.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
on 28/11/2008 17:27 Mike Tancsa said the following:
At 09:28 AM 11/28/2008, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Then I kill -9 watchdogd.
timer reloded messages are no longer produced.
And there are no other messages.
But nothing happens for many minutes that I waited.
Is the watchdog disabled
PriP PriO])
Subsystem: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE6101 single-port
PATA133 interface
...
ATA driver is also cool:
atapci0: Marvell 88SX6101 UDMA133 controller
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
think that this demonstrates that FreeBSD smb driver expects slave
addresses in range 0x0-0x7f.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
on 21/11/2008 15:55 Andriy Gapon said the following:
It seems that smbmsg is another victim in Great SMBus Slave Address
Confusion - there are two schools: one that think that slave address is
(addr 1) and there other thinks that slave address is (addr ~0x1).
It seems that smb driver
on 21/11/2008 18:48 Gavin Atkinson said the following:
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 17:16 +0100, Joerg Wunsch wrote:
As Andriy Gapon wrote:
Now:
(0x44 1) 0xff == (0xc4 1) 0xff = 0x88 (looks like RTC)
(0x50 1) 0xff == (0xd0 1) 0xff = 0xa0 (well known SPD addr)
(0x52 1) 0xff == (0xd2 1
Am I stupid or is our 'find' is seriously broken in one subtle feature?
$ find -L . -type l
find all broken symlinks (target doesn't exists)
$ find -L . -type l -delete
removes all symlinks!!!
FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE amd64
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd
on 13/11/2008 16:17 Eugene Grosbein said the following:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 03:38:51PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Am I stupid or is our 'find' is seriously broken in one subtle feature?
$ find -L . -type l
find all broken symlinks (target doesn't exists)
$ find -L . -type l -delete
on 12/11/2008 13:53 Nate Eldredge said the following:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 05/11/2008 17:24 Andriy Gapon said the following:
[...]
I have a legacy-free system (no PS/2 ports, only USB) and I wanted to
try a kernel without atkbd and psm (with ums, ukbd, kbdmux
chain, etc. I am not even interested
in speculations about whether keyboard would work or not at mountroot
prompt if it were attaching before it.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
on 12/11/2008 14:14 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 01:58:58PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
2. if ukbd driver is not attached then I don't see any way USB keyboard
would work in non-legacy way
Regarding #2: at which stage? boot0/boot2/loader require
on 05/11/2008 17:24 Andriy Gapon said the following:
System is FreeBSD 7.1-BETA2 amd64.
Looking through my dmesg I see that relative order of ukbd attachment
and root mounting is not deterministic. Sometime keyboard is attached
first, sometimes root filesystem is mounted first. Quite more
will have
to live with it (this system doesn't have PS/2 ports at all).
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 12/11/2008 14:33 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 02:20:41PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 12/11/2008 14:14 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 01:58:58PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
2. if ukbd driver is not attached then I don't see
on 08/11/2008 14:31 Volker said the following:
Andriy,
On 12/23/-58 20:59, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I have a quite strange problem.
This is with 7-BETA amd64.
Did it work with earlier versions?
Can't say, this is a new machine, FreeBSD took its virginity :-)
All of USB is out of kernel
on 06/11/2008 14:34 Andriy Gapon said the following:
I have a quite strange problem.
This is with 7-BETA amd64.
All of USB is out of kernel and is loaded via modules.
BIOS has Legacy USB enabled.
I have only a USB keyboard, no PS/2 port.
The keyboard works file in BIOS and for selecting
(me)
camcontrol rescan all done some time later stuck in cbwait state.
System is recent releng/7 amd64.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
on 07/11/2008 17:42 Gavin Atkinson said the following:
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 13:37 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I am a firewire newbie, so forgive me the following question.
I disconnect external firewire HDD, firewire subsystem notices this but
da0 device entry persists. Is this correct
, and X gets started!
Seems illogical. Or maybe kdm-bin does something smart behind the scenes.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
into kernel.
Weird...
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in hardware).
BIOS has USB Legacy enabled.
GENERIC, obviously, has atkbd and kbdmux in it.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
I need such emulation e.g. for loader or
boot0 configuration. But I guess I don't have to have atkbd driver in
kernel.
I wonder why behavior is non-deterministic, why ukbd is 99% attached
after mount root, and what can be done about this.
--
Andriy Gapon
on 05/11/2008 18:01 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 05:24:03PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
Another (with custom kernel, zfs root):
Nov 4 17:54:03 odyssey kernel: Trying to mount root from zfs:tank/root
Nov 4 17:54:03 odyssey kernel: ukbd0: CHESEN USB
This was a long time ago, and it really warns about the same balance
that you do, but it can hint at source of authority for all the
configs around.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 4294967295 pkt len
4294967295)
nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 3 pkt len 3)
Maybe these messages could give a hint about what was going wrong in nfe.
on 04/07/2008 00:26 Andriy Gapon said the following:
As they say - long time
with gdb stub enabled (qemu
-s) and then connecting with remote gdb help?
I am not sure about debugging symbols but raw assembly you should be
able to track.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
in device.hints for uart:
hint.uart.0.at=isa
hint.uart.0.port=0x3F8
hint.uart.0.flags=0x10
hint.uart.0.irq=4
hint.uart.1.at=isa
hint.uart.1.port=0x2F8
hint.uart.1.irq=3
hint.uart.2.at=isa
Precisely the same hints (s/uart/sio/) I had for sio.
Please advise.
--
Andriy Gapon
on 15/09/2008 17:36 Ian Smith said the following:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008, Andriy Gapon wrote:
This is a fairly standard and old machine with 2 COM ports.
Recently (last Friday) I decided to update my RELENG_7 system and also
to transition from sio to uart.
This what I had before
for G80 cards.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
). So the interface works for outgoing packets, but
somehow loses incoming arp replies. Not sure if thap happens in the NIC
or in the driver itself (see the above nve/nfe live replacement experiment).
So, there are some facts, but still no clues.
--
Andriy Gapon
serializes
snapshot creation (I think there are further serialization points that
prevent simultaneous snapshotting of the same fs).
There is nothing I can see that protects snapshots/gjournal interaction.
Looks like something to be quite concerned about.
Thank you for the analysis.
--
Andriy Gapon
this was the first time when level
2 dump was followed by level 4 dump. In previous months it was followed
by level 6 dumps.
All in all, quite strange.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
on 04/06/2008 18:23 Kostik Belousov said the following:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 06:07:47PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
dumps are done on live filesystems using -L.
[snip]
4. both systems have gjournal support (on 6.X it is added via a
non-official patch), there are gjournaled filesystems
Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2008 10:02:08 +0300
Andriy Gapon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, by the way, there is a (slightly) more valid reason to want to
create a directory under /dev, I recently had it. For one non-standard
third-party application I needed
not only SMP is affected.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
application I needed to create a link to existing device in
a certain subdirectory. I.e.:
/dev/subdirX/device - /dev/deviceX
And I couldn't do that.
Or maybe link operation for devfs just needs to be taught about creating
subdirectories on demand. I don't know.
--
Andriy Gapon
support in NetBSD. I think that porting his work
is our best chance to get write support in FreeBSD too.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
that performance advantage of libthr over libkse came with a
price. I think that something like queued locks is needed. They would
clearly reduce raw throughput performance, so maybe that should be a new
(non-portable?) mutex attribute.
--
Andriy Gapon
on 15/05/2008 12:05 David Xu said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
Brent, David,
thank you for the responses.
I think I incorrectly formulated my original concern.
It is not about behavior at mutex unlock but about behavior at mutex
re-lock. You are right that waking waiters at unlock
in it.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on 15/05/2008 15:57 David Xu said the following:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
Maybe. But that's not what I see with my small example program. One
thread releases and re-acquires a mutex 10 times in a row while the
other doesn't get it a single time.
I think that there is a very slim chance
acquires and releases and reacquires a mutex during 10 seconds while the
other thread is blocked on that mutex for 10 seconds, then this is not
about timeslices.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
on 15/05/2008 22:51 Brent Casavant said the following:
On Thu, 15 May 2008, Andriy Gapon wrote:
With current libthr behavior the GUI thread would never have a chance to get
the mutex as worker thread would always be a winner (as my small program
shows).
The example you gave indicates
?
P.S. I understand that all this is subject to (thread) scheduler policy,
but I think that what I expect is more reasonable, at least it is more
reasonable for my application.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
on 14/05/2008 18:17 Andriy Gapon said the following:
I am trying the small attached program on FreeBSD 6.3 (amd64,
SCHED_4BSD) and 7-STABLE (i386, SCHED_ULE), both with libthr as threads
library and on both it produces BROKEN message.
I compile this program as follows:
cc sched_test.c -o
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
execute bt command :-)
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if this is some brokenness of that driver or fighting of
several USB drivers over the same hardware.
P.S. sorry for the wide broadcast, but I think that users on all 3 lists
might be interested.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
on 17/04/2008 18:31 Paul Schmehl said the following:
--On Thursday, April 17, 2008 18:06:28 +0300 Andriy Gapon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 17/04/2008 17:56 Paul Schmehl said the following:
I wish I had a core file to analyze. *Every* time I reboot my machine, I
have to disconnect my usb
thing: in the problematic scenario, if I unload
nfe.ko and load nve.ko then the NIC becomes alive, unload nve and
re-load nfe NIC is still dead. Mystery.
I'll try to do more local debugging later when I have a chance to hit
the reset button.
--
Andriy Gapon
on the file? Have I somehow damaged my
ufs2+softupdates filesystem by losing its inode #5 containing snapshot
data?
Any insights appreciated,
You can try stat(1) on it to see all the details, that could help with
further conclusions.
--
Andriy Gapon
on 04/02/2008 05:52 Pyun YongHyeon said the following:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 03:56:17PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 01/02/2008 15:42 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 01/02/2008 14:36 Pyun YongHyeon said the following:
After applying attached patch and let me know the output
on 25/02/2008 15:02 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 04/02/2008 05:52 Pyun YongHyeon said the following:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 03:56:17PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 01/02/2008 15:42 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 01/02/2008 14:36 Pyun YongHyeon said the following:
After
on 20/02/2008 20:45 Brian A. Seklecki said the following:
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:29 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE amd64
Running sysinstall for post-installation configuration of sorts in
xterm/konsole/gnome-terminal.
Hmm your $TERM environmental variable is set to vt100
.
on 04/02/2008 18:09 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 01/02/2008 11:38 Vojtech Pavlik said the following:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 11:35:33AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I compared FreeBSD and Linux sources more thoroughly and found the
following:
http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.24/drivers/input
on 01/02/2008 11:38 Vojtech Pavlik said the following:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 11:35:33AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I compared FreeBSD and Linux sources more thoroughly and found the
following:
http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.24/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-base.c#L464
static int
on 30/01/2008 18:45 Vojtech Pavlik said the following:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 05:30:02PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
I see that Linux driver and FreeBSD driver are (mostly) equivalent in
IntelliMouse Explorer detection. I wonder if Linux handles this mouse
well, and if yes, then how
on 01/02/2008 11:38 Vojtech Pavlik said the following:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 11:35:33AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I did the same in FreeBSD psm.c, i.e., added a call to
enable_msintelli() at the very start of enable_msexplorer(). And voilà -
everything is perfect, correct ID is returned
Network Bus Enumerator'
class = bridge
P.S. as always with network issues, I understand that it may be not so
simple, e.g. some interaction between the card and the switch, etc.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
print rev instead of dev
for the second time :-)
This is in working case:
devid : 269, revid : a3, pwr = 0003
Will wait for the non-working situation.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
on 01/02/2008 15:42 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 01/02/2008 14:36 Pyun YongHyeon said the following:
After applying attached patch and let me know the output of
devid : xxx, revid : xxx, pwr = xxx. It would be even better
if you can show me the above message for working/non-working case
on 31/01/2008 13:07 John Baldwin said the following:
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 12:39:14 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
The problem is as follows:
1. put udf_load=YES in loader.conf
2. you can mount and unmount udf filesystems
3. you can kldunload udf if no udf filesystems are mounted
4. now mount
on 31/01/2008 14:39 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 31/01/2008 13:07 John Baldwin said the following:
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 12:39:14 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
The problem is as follows:
1. put udf_load=YES in loader.conf
2. you can mount and unmount udf filesystems
3. you can
on 31/01/2008 18:52 John Baldwin said the following:
On Thursday 31 January 2008 10:05:57 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 31/01/2008 14:39 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 31/01/2008 13:07 John Baldwin said the following:
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 12:39:14 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
The problem
, then how.
on 25/01/2008 14:35 Andriy Gapon said the following:
I've recently got a cheap PS/2 mouse A4 Tech OP-3D:
http://www.a4tech.com/EN/product2.asp?CID=114SCID=115MNO=OP-3D
It looks like your regular mouse with a combined
middle-button/scroll-wheel. The only unusual feature is an additional
kldunload: can't unload file: Device busy
kernel message: kldunload: attempt to unload file that was loaded by the
kernel
Yeah, it was loaded by kernel indeed, but WTF - what is the difference
from manual/loader.conf loading and why I can not manage my modules as I
wish?
--
Andriy Gapon
on 30/01/2008 19:39 Andriy Gapon said the following:
The problem is as follows:
1. put udf_load=YES in loader.conf
2. you can mount and unmount udf filesystems
3. you can kldunload udf if no udf filesystems are mounted
4. now mount udf fs while udf.ko is unloaded
5. udf is auto loaded and fs
. This is not fatal in Label screen because
navigation cycles, but in Fdisk menu you can not reach up from the
bottom entry (slice).
In system console everything is OK, though.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
underlying
device type and use different techniques.
It seems that these features are not terribly hard to implement (using
acd as an example). I am not volunteering at this moment, but this could
be added to some junior hacker tasks list.
--
Andriy Gapon
801 - 900 of 947 matches
Mail list logo
