Hi,
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
I reproduced the previous problem on 10-CURRENT
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
I reproduced the previous problem on 10-CURRENT from r233917, on the
following platform (here running 8.2-RELEASE):
FreeBSD
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
[for the record...]
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
For the records, I was running some tests yesterday on top of a
9.0-RELEASE, amd64, kernel when
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/2/29, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/2/29
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/3/5, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
9.0-RELEASE (kernel + userland) hanged today while running 2000
threads. Next step is to reproduce it with a watchdog+textdump enabled
kernel.
And you were still unable
Hi,
I've been running a couple of system with 9.0-RELEASE since it is out.
All the system were installed through the standard installation
procedure. After unclean reboot, either crash or power-failure, I get
a huge amount of really bad filesystem corruption (read: silent,
fs-wide, corruptions).
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/2/27, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/2/27, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
Hi
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/2/29, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/2/29, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/2/29, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Arnaud
Hi,
2012/2/27 Łukasz Wąsikowski luk...@wasikowski.net:
W dniu 2012-02-22 23:31, Bjoern A. Zeeb pisze:
You cannot ship that on by default for non-tecnical reasons in a kernel.
Please do not commit a kernel config that can be booted (no LINT cannot be
booted) with these on without
Hi,
2012/2/27 Steve Wills swi...@freebsd.org:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/27/12 10:53, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote:
W dniu 2012-02-22 23:31, Bjoern A. Zeeb pisze:
You cannot ship that on by default for non-tecnical reasons in a
kernel. Please do not commit a kernel
Hi,
2012/2/28 Łukasz Wąsikowski luk...@wasikowski.net:
W dniu 2012-02-28 19:55, Arnaud Lacombe pisze:
FLOWTABLE on 8.x crashed BGP routers (kern/144917).
no crash dump, no backtrace, no follow-up whatsoever after 1 year and
2 years, what's your points ? You could really have chosen a better
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
For the records, I was running some tests yesterday on top of a
9.0-RELEASE, amd64, kernel when the box hanged. At the time of the
hang, the box was running a process with about 2800 threads with heavy
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/2/27, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
For the records, I was running some tests yesterday on top of a
9.0-RELEASE
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
Using igb and/or ixgbe on a reasonably powered server requires 1K mbuf
clusters per MSIX vector,
that's how many are in a ring. Either driver will configure 8 queues on a
system with that many or more
cores, so 8K
Hi folks,
For the records, I was running some tests yesterday on top of a
9.0-RELEASE, amd64, kernel when the box hanged. At the time of the
hang, the box was running a process with about 2800 threads with heavy
IPC between 1400 writers and 1400 readers. The box was in single user
mode (/bin/sh
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:16 PM, matt...@phoronix.com wrote:
Thanks.
My request for the person documenting the tunings also runs the benchmark to
ensure expected behaviour.
Why should you have to tune anything ? Did you tune the Oracle Server
install ? If not, you should not have to
Hi,
[resend on the ml, my bad]
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2011/12/16 Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, O. Hartmann
ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, O. Hartmann
ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTAyNzA
it might be worth highlighting that despite Oracle Linux 6.1 Server is
using a kernel +
Hi,
A FreeBSD 7-STABLE miserably crashes on the following:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault virtual address = 0xbfef
fault code= supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc05fd1c2
stack pointer =
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Alan Cox alan.l@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
A FreeBSD 7-STABLE miserably crashes on the following:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Alan Cox alan.l@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
A FreeBSD 7-STABLE miserably crashes on the following:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Ken Smith kensm...@buffalo.edu wrote:
The third BETA build of the 9.0-RELEASE release cycle is now
available. Since this is the first release of a brand new branch
I cross
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 October 2011 16:35, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 Oct 2011 16:26, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
What is your Wiki name?
ArnaudLacombe
created this morning, with the same email address as the one I'm
sending this email with.
Thanks,
- Arnaud
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Ken Smith kensm...@buffalo.edu wrote:
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 22:40 +0400, Andrey Fesenko wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Ken Smith kensm...@buffalo.edu wrote:
The 9.0-RELEASE cycle will be tracked here:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Ken Smith kensm...@buffalo.edu wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/4/11 3:39 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
you've got to be fraking kidding me, aren't you ?
Code freeze has happened, no date set. BETA-1, BETA-2 have been
released
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Had you loved so much to have this information, you would have given
me credential.
I may have filled in all the date from publicly available
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Had you loved so much to have this information, you would have given
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Vlad Galu d...@dudu.ro wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Joshua Boyd boy...@jbip.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Had
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Ken Smith kensm...@buffalo.edu wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/4/11 3:39 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
you've got to be fraking kidding me, aren't you ?
Code freeze has happened, no date set. BETA-1, BETA-2 have been
released
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Ken Smith kensm...@buffalo.edu wrote:
The third BETA build of the 9.0-RELEASE release cycle is now
available. Since this is the first release of a brand new branch
I cross-post the announcements on both -current and -stable. But
just so you know most of
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:54 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 5:55:09 pm Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
I got a strange boot failure when booting a FreeBSD 7-stable after a
8-stable kernel, with a FreeBSD 7.4 kernel:
pid 100 (fsck_ufs), uid 0: exited
Hi,
I got a strange boot failure when booting a FreeBSD 7-stable after a
8-stable kernel, with a FreeBSD 7.4 kernel:
pid 100 (fsck_ufs), uid 0: exited on signal 8
pid 101 (fsck_ufs), uid 0: exited on signal 8
WARNING: R/W mount of / denied. Filesystem is not clean - run fsck
WARNING: R/W mount
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Özkan KIRIK ozkan.ki...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi again,
I wanna share state of test machine. em-7.2.2 driver runs as kld. No hangs.
How high is `nmbclusters' ?
Thanks,
- Arnaud
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
of it and it
will be happy. 200MBps is about 18000 1500bytes packet by seconds. I
will not trust the quality of any code which need 10x more resources
available than needed to do the job. Even 1Gbps should be attainable
with only 128k clusters.
- Arnaud
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom
Hi Jack,
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
Missed packets just mean that some temporary resource shortage or error
caused
the packet to be dropped. I don't believe this is indicative of a problem,
just let it
keep running, 2 days is good but 2 weeks is
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jack,
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Jack Vogel jfvo...@gmail.com wrote:
Missed packets just mean that some temporary resource shortage or error
caused
the packet to be dropped. I don't believe
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Lev Serebryakov l...@serebryakov.spb.ru wrote:
Hello, Mike.
You wrote 1 марта 2011 г., 17:20:49:
I have been running with 7.2.2 and so far so good. However, its hard to
say in my case as the box I would only periodically see the issue.
As I wrote to
Have you found a solution to this? I am having the same problems on a
machine very recently updated (cvsupped + buildworld on 4/14/2005):
kernel.log:Feb 25 13:46:40 trinity kernel: rl0: discard oversize frame
(ether type 3db4 flags 3 len 8381 max 1514)
kernel.log:Apr 10 14:27:37 trinity
41 matches
Mail list logo
