On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 1:21 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Saturday, June 29, 2013 9:19:24 pm Steven Hartland wrote:
when booting stable/9 under a debug kernel with WITNESS
enabled and verbose I get the following panic..
It seems very much like the discussion from a year back on
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Alexander Nikiforenko
a...@rambler-co.ru wrote:
hi, i was run ssh-keygen with output to 32g usb 3.0 flash, and got this core
sorry, i was forgot.
i mount that flash via fusefs-exfat-0.9.8
This is on stable/9?
If yes, I will send you patches to use new fuse
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
schrieb Attilio Rao am 29.10.2012 23:02 (localtime):
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
schrieb Attilio Rao am 27.10.2012 23:07 (localtime):
On Sat, Oct
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
schrieb Attilio Rao am 09.08.2012 20:26 (localtime):
On 8/8/12, Harald Schmalzbauer h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
schrieb Pavel
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
schrieb Attilio Rao am 09.08.2012 20:26 (localtime):
On 8/8/12
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Marcelo Gondim gon...@bsdinfo.com.br
wrote:
I installed the package ntfs-fusefs on two different servers and both
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Marcelo Gondim gon...@bsdinfo.com.br wrote:
I installed the package ntfs-fusefs on two different servers and both causes
kernel panic when trying to copy anything.
A server using FreeBSD 9.0 STABLE amd64 and the other using FreeBSD 9 RC1
amd64.
Someone is
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
schrieb Attilio Rao am 09.08.2012 20:26 (localtime):
On 8/8/12, Harald Schmalzbauer h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
schrieb Pavel Polyakov am 06.03.2012 11:20 (localtime):
mount -t unionfs -o noatime /usr
On 8/8/12, Harald Schmalzbauer h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
schrieb Pavel Polyakov am 06.03.2012 11:20 (localtime):
mount -t unionfs -o noatime /usr /mnt
insmntque: mp-safe fs and non-locked vp: 0xfe01d96704f0 is not
exclusive locked but should be
KDB: enter: lock violation
Pavel,
On 8/8/12, Harald Schmalzbauer h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de wrote:
schrieb Pavel Polyakov am 06.03.2012 11:20 (localtime):
mount -t unionfs -o noatime /usr /mnt
insmntque: mp-safe fs and non-locked vp: 0xfe01d96704f0 is not
exclusive locked but should be
KDB: enter: lock violation
Pavel,
On 8/2/12, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wednesday, August 01, 2012 6:48:48 pm Sean Bruno wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 05:53 -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
Index: vfs_subr.c
===
--- vfs_subr.c (revision 238969)
+++
On 8/1/12, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 4:51:19 pm Attilio Rao wrote:
On 7/31/12, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 7:58:14 pm Sean Bruno wrote:
Working on the Dell R420 today, got most of it working, even the
broadcom
On 8/1/12, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 8/1/12, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 4:51:19 pm Attilio Rao wrote:
On 7/31/12, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 7:58:14 pm Sean Bruno wrote:
Working on the Dell R420 today
On 7/31/12, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 7:58:14 pm Sean Bruno wrote:
Working on the Dell R420 today, got most of it working, even the
broadcom ethernet cards! However, I get the following when I reboot the
system:
Syncing disks, vnodes remaining...4
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Andrew Boyer abo...@averesystems.com wrote:
On Jul 26, 2012, at 8:50 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
For the time being I had to revert the following from my stable/9 tree.
Otherwise I would get a kernel panic on shutdown from ipmi(4).
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Andrew Boyer abo...@averesystems.com wrote:
On Jul 27, 2012, at 10:42 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Andrew Boyer abo...@averesystems.com
wrote:
On Jul 26, 2012, at 8:50 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
For the time being I had to revert
2012/5/25, Sean Bruno sean...@yahoo-inc.com:
Dell R620, getting pretty reliable panics here everytime I reboot.
http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/sandybridge_reboot_panic.txt
I'm sure that if you drop hwpmc you will get rid of it.
it would be good if you however get something for Davide and
2012/3/5, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/2/29, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:44 PM
2012/2/29, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org
wrote:
2012
2012/2/29, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2012/2/29, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:48 PM
2012/2/27, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
For the records, I was running some tests yesterday on top of a
9.0-RELEASE, amd64, kernel when the box hanged. At the time of the
hang, the box was
2012/2/13, Pavel Polyakov b...@kobyla.org:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165087
Occurs simply trying to use unionfs:
mount -t unionfs -o noatime /usr /mnt
insmntque: mp-safe fs and non-locked vp: 0xfe01d96704f0 is not
exclusive locked but should be
KDB: enter: lock
2012/2/14, Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net:
Quoting Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net (from Fri, 10
Feb 2012 14:56:04 +0100):
Such a kernel would cover situations where people compile their own
kernel because they want to get rid of some unused kernel code (and
maybe
2011/12/16 Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, O. Hartmann
ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTAyNzA
it might be worth highlighting that despite
2011/12/15 Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:25:51PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
I basically went through all the e-mail you just sent and identified 4
real report on which we could work on and summarizied in the attached
Excel file.
I'd like that George
2011/12/9 George Mitchell george+free...@m5p.com:
dnetc is an open-source program from http://www.distributed.net/. It
tries a brute-force approach to cracking RC4 puzzles and also computes
optimal Golomb rulers. It starts up one process per CPU and runs at
nice 20 and is, for all intents
2011/12/14 Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net:
On 12/13/2011 7:01 PM, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Has anyone experiencing problems tried to set sysctl
kern.sched.steal_thresh=1 ?
I don't remember what our specific problem at $WORK was, perhaps it
was just interrupt threads not getting serviced fast
2011/12/13 Daniel Kalchev dan...@digsys.bg:
On 13.12.11 09:36, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I personally would find it interesting if someone with a higher-end system
(e.g. 2 physical CPUs, with 6 or 8 cores per CPU) was to do the same test
(changing -jX to -j{numofcores} of course).
Is 4 way
2011/12/13 Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 02:47:57PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
Not fully right, boinc defaults to run on idprio 31 so this isn't an
issue. And yes, there are cases where SCHED_ULE shows much better
performance then SCHED_4BSD. [...]
Do
2011/12/15 Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net:
On 12/15/2011 11:26 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
Hi Mike,
was that just the same codebase with the switch SCHED_4BSD/SCHED_ULE?
Hi Attilio,
It was the same codebase.
Could you retry the bench checking CPU usage and possible thread
migration
2011/12/15 Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net:
On 12/15/2011 11:42 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
I'm thinking now to a better test-case for this: can you try that on a
tmpfs volume?
There is enough RAM in the box so that it should not touch the disk, and
I was sending the output to /dev/null, so
2011/12/15 Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:26:27PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
2011/12/13 Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 02:47:57PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
Not fully right, boinc defaults to run on idprio 31 so
2011/12/15 Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net:
On 12/15/2011 11:56 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
So, as very first thing, can you try the following:
- Same codebase, etc. etc.
- Make the test 4 times, discard the first and ministat for the other 3
- Reboot
- Change the steal_thresh value
- Make the test
2011/12/9 George Mitchell george+free...@m5p.com:
dnetc is an open-source program from http://www.distributed.net/. It
tries a brute-force approach to cracking RC4 puzzles and also computes
optimal Golomb rulers. It starts up one process per CPU and runs at
nice 20 and is, for all intents
2011/12/10 George Mitchell george+free...@m5p.com:
On 12/09/11 10:17, Attilio Rao wrote:
[...]
More precisely I'd be interested in KTR traces.
To be even more precise:
With a completely stable GENERIC configuration (or otherwise please
post your kernel config) please add the following
2011/12/10 Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com:
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:15 PM, George Mitchell geo...@m5p.com wrote:
Hope the attached helps. -- George Mitchell
You attached dmesg, not a patch.
This is what is needed for a schedgraph analysis, along with KTR
points
2011/9/27 crsnet.pl crs...@crsnet.pl:
Hi,
Hello, thanks for reply.
Please try to do this without wlan loaded at all (not just down, but
build your wifi support as a module.)
Then try without X, see whether it's related to that or not.
First i make kldunload if_iwn.
When i try to suspend
2011/9/1 Trent Nelson tr...@snakebite.org:
On Aug 19, 2011, at 7:53 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
If nobody complains about it earlier, I'll propose the patch to re@ in 8
hours.
Just a friendly 'me too', for the records. 22 hours of heavy network/disk
I/O and no panic yet -- prior to the patch
2011/8/12 Andrew Boyer abo...@averesystems.com:
Re: panic: bufwrite: buffer is not busy??? (originally on freebsd-net)
Re: debugging frequent kernel panics on 8.2-RELEASE (originally on
freebsd-stable)
Re: System hang in USB umass module while processing panic (originally on
freebsd-usb)
If nobody complains about it earlier, I'll propose the patch to re@ in 8 hours.
Attilio
2011/8/19 Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net:
On 8/18/2011 8:37 PM, Chip Camden wrote:
st Thanks, Attilio. I've applied the patch and removed the extra debug
st options I had added (though keeping debug
2011/8/18 Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org:
on 17/08/2011 23:21 Andriy Gapon said the following:
It seems like everything starts with some kind of a race between
terminating
processes in a jail and termination of the jail itself. This is where the
details are very thin so far. What we see is
2011/8/17 Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org:
Hi,
Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote
in 4e15a08c.6090...@sentex.net:
mi On 7/7/2011 7:32 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
mi On 7/7/2011 4:20 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
mi
mi BTW, we had a similar panic, spinlock held too long, the spinlock
mi is the
2011/8/18 Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org:
Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote
in 20110818.043332.27079545013461535@allbsd.org:
hr Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote
hr in caj-fndcdow0_b2mv0lzeo-tpea9+7oanj7ihvkqsm4j4b0d...@mail.gmail.com:
hr
hr at 2011/8/17 Hiroki Sato h
2011/8/18 Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org:
Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote
in 20110818.043332.27079545013461535@allbsd.org:
hr Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote
hr in caj-fndcdow0_b2mv0lzeo-tpea9+7oanj7ihvkqsm4j4b0d...@mail.gmail.com:
hr
hr at 2011/8/17 Hiroki Sato h
I'd really point the finger to faulty hw.
Please run all the necessary diagnostic tools for catching it.
Attilio
2011/8/11 Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org:
on 10/08/2011 18:35 Steven Hartland said the following:
Fatal double fault
rip = 0x8052f6f1
rsp = 0xff86ce600fb0
rbp =
2011/8/11 Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.com:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:59:36AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
That's not the issue as its happening across board over 130 machines :(
Agreed, bad hardware sounds unlikely here. I could believe some strange
incompatibility (e.g. BIOS
2011/6/3 Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org:
On 06/03/11 10:13, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I wonder if anybody uses kdb_stop_cpus with non-default value.
If, yes, I am very interested to learn about your usecase for it.
I think that the default kdb behavior is the correct one, so it doesn't
2011/6/4 Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org:
on 03/06/2011 20:57 Robert N. M. Watson said the following:
On 3 Jun 2011, at 16:13, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I wonder if anybody uses kdb_stop_cpus with non-default value. If, yes, I
am very interested to learn about your usecase for it.
The issue that
2010/12/10 Arno J. Klaassen a...@heho.snv.jussieu.fr:
Hello,
just FYI that on an 8-way Tyan S3992-E based box, a reboot under
8.2-PRERELEASE (in fact, 8-stable since quite a while) makes the box
freeze, whilst the same thing under -current works OK.
For info the end of console output in
Sorry for the mis-service, it should be fixed now.
Thanks,
Attilio
2010/10/26 Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com:
After a csup, building the GENERIC kernel on amd64 fails with:
make -V CFILES -V SYSTEM_CFILES -V GEN_CFILES | MKDEP_CPP=cc -E
CC=cc xargs mkdep -a -f .newdep -O2
This issue should be resolved by r214370 already; someone else can
validate this?
Thanks,
Attilio
2010/10/26 FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org:
TB --- 2010-10-26 06:20:40 - tinderbox 2.6 running on
freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-10-26 06:20:40 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run
2010/5/14 Giovanni Trematerra giovanni.tremate...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Brandon Gooch
jamesbrandongo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2010/5/12 David DEMELIER demelier.da...@gmail.com:
I remove the patch
2010/5/12 David DEMELIER demelier.da...@gmail.com:
I remove the patch, and built the kernel (I updated the src this
morning) and it does not panic now. It's really odd. If it reappears
soon I will tell you.
I looked at the code with Giovanni and I have the feeling that the
race with the idle
2010/4/9 Jakub Lach jakub_l...@mailplus.pl:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
Really shooting in the dark here: are there any BIOS options about HPET
and RTC on
this system? Can you try playing with them?
Hello. I have similar problem. Once in few boots performance would be
sluggish and
top
2010/4/8 Andriy Gapon a...@icyb.net.ua:
on 08/04/2010 04:29 Akephalos said the following:
Attilio, I csup-dated several hours ago and rebuilt and installed the kernel
(and world, in case it matters).
%uname -a FreeBSD free.bsd369441.org 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Thu
Apr 8 03:01:13
2010/4/6 Akephalos Akephalos akephalos.akepha...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
What architecture is it?
May you try setting machdep.lapic_allclocks to 1 in /boot/loader.conf?
May you report #dmesg | grep atrtc
Thanks,
Attilio
2010/4/4 Akephalos Akephalos akephalos.akepha...@gmail.com:
Hey,
I installed 8.0 release and used it very briefly until updating through
cvsup to the latest stable source. I had no problems with the release (DVD)
version, except that my wireless card wasn't detected, so updating was the
2010/1/27 Brandon Gooch jamesbrandongo...@gmail.com:
The machine, a Dell Optiplex 755, has been locking up recently. The
situation usually occurs while using VirtualBox (running a 64-bit
Windows 7 instance) and doing anything else in another xterm (such as
rebuilding a port). I've been unable
2010/1/21 Willem Jan Withagen w...@digiware.nl:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
I'm trying to revive an old dual optern Tyan Tomcat S2875 board. Even
upgraded it to the most recent BIOS. But still no go.
Both with 8.0 and 7.2 RELEASE.
I've also disabled P1394 and all USB in the BIOS, that did
2010/1/19 Pete French petefre...@ticketswitch.com:
May you post your kernel config?
sure...
include GENERIC
ident DEBUG
options KDB
options DDB
options WITNESS
options INVARIANT_SUPPORT
2010/1/18 Pete French petefre...@ticketswitch.com:
One may never know, try without WITNESS but still the same setup.
Well, I have been running like this for three days with no lockups
dissapointingly. I just saw that you commited the lock patches, so
am going to update to the latest STABLE
2010/1/15 Pete French petefre...@ticketswitch.com:
Well, the machine has been running the WITNESS + INVARIANTS kernel
for 20 hours now without locking up.This looks like what I
saw before - compiling in WITNESS stops it locking up -(
Is there any use in my runing a kernel with just INVARIANTS
2010/1/14 Pete French petefre...@ticketswitch.com:
http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/lockmgr_fix8.diff
I'm seeking for testers here.
Any report would be very much appreciated.
I tested the patch on my machine which locks up, and I am afraid that it
still locks, even with the patch applied.
2010/1/14 Pete French petefre...@ticketswitch.com:
INVARIANTS requires INVARIANT_SUPPORT [sic] in the kernel config (see
comments in GENERIC).
Ah, right, that would explain it. Thanks!
INVARIANT_SUPPORT is made mandatory in order to allow non-INVARIANT
kernel to be able to handle INVARIANT
As people following HEAD may have seen, around 1 month ago a fix to
lockmgr(9) has been committed that should prevent a deadlock for that
primitive (the fixup is composed by r200447,201703,201709-201710).
As long as the approach choosen in HEAD is optimal, unluckilly it does
introduce an ABI
2009/10/23 Jaime Bozza jbo...@mindsites.com:
I believe I found a problem with the ULE scheduler - At least the fact that
there is a problem, but I'm not sure where to go from here. The system
locks all processes, but doesn't panic, so I have no output to give.
I was able to duplicate this
2009/11/6 Dorr H. Clark dcl...@engr.scu.edu:
We believe we have identified a significant resource leak
present in 6.x, 7.x, and 8.x. We believe this is a regression
versus FreeBSD 4.x which appears to do the Right Thing (tm).
We have a test program (see below) which will run the system
2009/10/21 Igor Sysoev i...@rambler-co.ru:
Hi,
for some reason in 8.0 top always shows 0% CPU usage for intr kernel
process and active interrupt thread, irq19 bge0 in my case.
8-0 RC1 top -PS:
CPU 0: 27.8% user, 0.0% nice, 7.1% system, 0.0% interrupt, 65.0% idle
CPU 1: 3.0% user,
2009/9/28 C. C. Tang hiyo...@gmail.com:
C. C. Tang wrote:
Attilio Rao wrote:
2009/9/22 C. C. Tang hiyo...@gmail.com:
I have patched the sched_ule.c and did a make buildkernel make
installkernel (is buildworld and installworld necessary?), rebooted
and
the
machine is running now.
I
2009/9/24 Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Attilio Rao wrote:
2009/9/23 Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au:
If I enable the parallel port on this Gigabyte MA7785GM-US2H I get
a trap 12 when booting up.
I forgot to take a picture of it at the time but I
2009/9/23 Daniel O'Connor docon...@gsoft.com.au:
If I enable the parallel port on this Gigabyte MA7785GM-US2H I get a
trap 12 when booting up.
I forgot to take a picture of it at the time but I should be able to
reproduce it tomorrow.
Has anyone seen anything before? (a quick google showed
2009/9/22 C. C. Tang hiyo...@gmail.com:
I have patched the sched_ule.c and did a make buildkernel make
installkernel (is buildworld and installworld necessary?), rebooted and
the
machine is running now.
I will post here again if there is any update.
My server is up for 3.5 days now with
2009/9/19 Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:25 PM, C. C. Tang hiyo...@gmail.com wrote:
Attilio Rao wrote:
2009/9/17 C. C. Tang hiyo...@gmail.com:
Dan, is that machine equipped with Hyperthreading?
Attilio
Yes. It's an Intel Atom 330, which is a dualcore CPU
2009/9/17 C. C. Tang hiyo...@gmail.com:
Dan, is that machine equipped with Hyperthreading?
Attilio
Yes. It's an Intel Atom 330, which is a dualcore CPU with HT (4 cores
visible in top as a result)
Yes, mine is also Atom 330.
I cannot test the patch because my machine is also in
2009/7/23 C. C. Tang hiyo...@gmail.com:
Attilio Rao wrote:
2009/7/22 C. C. Tang hiyo...@gmail.com:
Could that one (on i386) be related?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/134584
I have no idea about it but I can tell the difference...
My machine panic randomly rather than
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com:
I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
portsnap update, /var/log/messages shows the following:
Jul 7 03:49:38 atom syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel
Jul 7 03:49:38 atom kernel: spin lock
2009/7/29 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
2009/5/23 Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de:
I wrote:
Syncing disks, vnodes remaining...0 done
All buffers synced.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device diesel_root: provider mirror/diesel_root destroyed.
Uptime: 6m32s
GEOM_MIRROR: Device diesel_root destroyed
2009/7/26 barbara barbara.xxx1...@libero.it:
It happened again, on shutdown.
As the previous time, it happened after a high (for a desktop) uptime and, if
it could matter, after running net-p2p/transmission-gtk2 for several hours.
I don't know if it's related, but often quitting transmission,
2009/7/26 barbara barbara.xxx1...@libero.it:
It happened again, on shutdown.
As the previous time, it happened after a high (for a desktop) uptime and, if
it could matter, after running net-p2p/transmission-gtk2 for several hours.
I don't know if it's related, but often quitting transmission,
2009/7/22 C. C. Tang hiyo...@gmail.com:
Could that one (on i386) be related?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/134584
I have no idea about it but I can tell the difference...
My machine panic randomly rather than on shutdown and I remembered that it
failed to write core dump.
randomly rather than on shutdown and I remembered
that it failed to write core dump. It also failed to reboot
automatically..
I also have trouble like yours.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2009-June/050526.html
I've heard from Attilio Rao that he had found the problem
2009/7/10 Oliver Pinter oliver.p...@gmail.com:
Hello!
Here is the bt:
http://centaur.sch.bme.hu/~oliverp/freebsd/smbfs_panic/DSC01845.JPG
http://centaur.sch.bme.hu/~oliverp/freebsd/smbfs_panic/DSC01846.JPG
http://centaur.sch.bme.hu/~oliverp/freebsd/smbfs_panic/DSC01847.JPG
Could you please
2009/7/11 Oliver Pinter oliver.p...@gmail.com:
regs and vnodes:
http://centaur.sch.bme.hu/~oliverp/freebsd/smbfs_panic/DSC01854.JPG
http://centaur.sch.bme.hu/~oliverp/freebsd/smbfs_panic/DSC01855.JPG
http://centaur.sch.bme.hu/~oliverp/freebsd/smbfs_panic/DSC01856.JPG
2009/7/10 Oliver Pinter oliver.p...@gmail.com:
Hi all!
It is a kernel panic, when force unmount the smbfs volume or lost the
connection with the samba server.
--
Thes OS is:
kern.ostype: FreeBSD
kern.osrelease: 7.2-STABLE
kern.osrevision: 199506
kern.version: FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #4:
2009/7/8 Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Dan Naumovdan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Attilio Raoatti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Attilio Raoatti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com:
I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
portsnap update, /var/log/messages shows the following:
Jul 7 03:49:38 atom syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel
Jul 7 03:49:38 atom kernel: spin lock
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Attilio Raoatti...@freebsd.org wrote:
2009/7/7 Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com:
I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
portsnap update, /var/log/messages shows the following:
Jul 7
2009/6/29 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2009/6/26 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2009/6/26 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
Hello.
While building a module on nfs mounted /usr/src
I got an unkillable process waiting forever in bo_wwait.
Small note: iface on NFS server has mtu changed from 1500 to 1450.
2009/6/29 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2009/6/29 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
2009/6/29 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2009/6/26 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2009/6/26 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
Hello.
While building a module on nfs mounted /usr/src
I got an unkillable process waiting forever
2009/6/29 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2009/6/29 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
2009/6/29 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2009/6/29 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
2009/6/29 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2009/6/26 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2009/6/26 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
Hello.
While
2009/6/29 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2009/6/29 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
2009/6/29 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2009/6/29 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
2009/6/29 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2009/6/29 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
2009/6/29 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2009/6/26
2009/6/29 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2009/6/29 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
2009/6/29 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2009/6/29 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
2009/6/29 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2009/6/29 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
2009/6/29 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2009/6/29
2009/6/29 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
2009/6/29 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2009/6/29 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
2009/6/29 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2009/6/29 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
2009/6/29 pluknet pluk...@gmail.com:
2009/6/29 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org:
2009/6
2009/6/10 NAKAJI Hiroyuki nak...@jp.freebsd.org:
Thanks Attilio,
I set up dcons target/host pair. Target is 7.2-STABLE and host is
6.4-STABLE.
Dcons session was recorded with script.
http://www.heimat.gr.jp/localhost/dcons.log
I'm following up privately with the user, news to come
2009/6/6 NAKAJI Hiroyuki nak...@jp.freebsd.org:
Hi,
I noticed, some months ago, frequent lockups on my RELENG_6 server with
ECS PM800-M2, Celeron 2.6GHz (UP), 2GB ram, ATA HDDs and 3Com NIC(xl0),
and then I gave up this old server.
Last month, I replaced this 'unstable' server to the new
2009/5/21 Riccardo Torrini riccardo.torr...@esaote.com:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:21:23AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Try this. It reverts the single-CCB part of the previous
commit while keeping the other fixes. I missed that the
CCB might still be in flight when we schedule another
Hello,
after MFC'ed the usage of LOCK_FILE and LOCK_LINE for lockmgr(9), now
thirdy part code needs to include sys/lock.h just priorior than
sys/lockmgr.
Even if the patch doesn't break ABI / KPI (so it doesn't need thirdy
part KLD to be recompiled), it worths noting that the new code needs
this
2008/3/25, Max Laier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Alex,
so it's basically back to square one. We only have LORs between the pfil
R/W lock (read instance) and mutexes that don't have any lock order with
the pfil R/W lock (write instance) at all. This means the deadlock can't
be explained by
2006/12/12, Kostik Belousov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 12:44:54AM -0800, Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:30:39AM +0100, V??clav Haisman wrote:
Hi,
the attached lor.txt contains LOR I got this yesterday. It is FreeBSD 6.1
with
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
