On 13 Sep 2020, at 5:30, sreehari wrote:
I just realized the link may be broken because of the dot after, here
it is: https://dmesgd.nycbug.org/index.cgi?do=view=5669
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 10:25 PM sreehari
wrote:
I tested FreeBSD 12.2-BETA1 and I have a ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen7
(which
On 21 Nov 2019, at 9:51, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Hi!
How do I get boot messages generated by loader itself written to some
log after successfull boot?
This is generic BIOS-based 11.3-STABLE/amd64 system with syscons
console driver.
/var/run/dmesg.boot starts with kernel messages without
On 12 Nov 2018, at 22:03, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> yeah, that we'll have to look into..
I was going to say that might be easy:
Index: sys/conf/files
===
--- sys/conf/files (revision 340282)
+++ sys/conf/files (working copy)
On 27 Oct 2018, at 18:43, tech-lists wrote:
On 27/10/2018 18:50, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
ugen1.3: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH
(480Mbps) pwr=ON (450mA)
bLength = 0x0012
bDescriptorType = 0x0001
bcdUSB = 0x0200
bDeviceClass = 0x
bDeviceSubClass = 0x
bDeviceProtocol
On 27 Oct 2018, at 16:01, tech-lists wrote:
Hi,
context: 12-stable amd64
When TP-LINK TL-WN321G usb dongle is inserted, this appears in dmesg:
ugen1.3: at usbus1
..
run0: MAC/BBP RT5390 (rev 0x0502), RF RT5370 (MIMO 1T1R), address
[REDACTED]
..
and run0 appears, and works, yet:
rum(4)
On 20 Aug 2018, at 16:22, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Is there a way to allow regular processes to bind to low ports?
you have to set it on the base system; alternatively with vnet you
might be able to change it per-jail.
Do you feel it’s OK to enable VIMAGE in -stable? When I tried last
in
On 20 Aug 2018, at 14:47, Stefan Bethke wrote:
I have a Go program (acme-dns) that wants to bind 53, 80, and 443, and
I’d rather have it run as a non-privileged user. The program
doesn’t provide a facility to drop privs after binding the ports.
I’m planning to run it in a jail.
After some
On 3 Aug 2018, at 20:42, Oliver Pinter wrote:
On 8/3/18, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 3 Aug 2018, at 18:48, Oliver Pinter wrote:
Hi all!
One of out users observed an VNET related kernel panic with epairs
in
a jail. Seems like some of the
Well would be great for a start to (a) email
On 3 Aug 2018, at 18:48, Oliver Pinter wrote:
Hi all!
One of out users observed an VNET related kernel panic with epairs in
a jail. Seems like some of the
Well would be great for a start to (a) email virtualisation@ as well,
(b) include a panic message, backtrace or other related
On 20 Nov 2016, at 11:10, Kamila Součková wrote:
Hi,
> I had another panic, this time not related to stopping a jail, but
> also mentioning pf in the stack trace. Therefore the previously
> mentioned correlation was not causation -- this crash must be
> connected with simply combining pf and
On 24 Aug 2015, at 09:56 , Maurizio Vairani
maurizio.vair...@cloverinformatica.it wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to update an amd64 system. With the command:
# freebsd-update upgrade -r 10.2-RELEASE
I receive the error:
will run a local resolver in a vm and logg all queries and dns
traffic.
Or run tcpdump for port 53; also curious if it might be an IPv4 vs. IPv6
issue?
—
Bjoern A. Zeeb Charles Haddon Spurgeon:
Friendship is one of the sweetest joys of life. Many might have failed
comes through, not even on epair0a.
bridge0 itself receives packets.
No firewall involved.
Any ideas?
Just checking, are all interfaces UP?
—
Bjoern A. Zeeb Charles Haddon Spurgeon:
Friendship is one of the sweetest joys of life. Many might have failed
the
next 12 hours. Enjoy!
Any further discussions on src export I'll leave to other people
wearing hats.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family
have 1 or 2 patches posted to net@
for review and testing though. Sorry not immediately helpful.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
___
freebsd
problems with packets dropped due to
invalid checksums with IPv6 and pf after the recent merges, can you
report back if you also see this without modulate state in your
pf.conf (if you have 'modulate' in there, can you try changing it to
'keep' and see if that fixes the problem)?
/bz
--
Bjoern
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 01/08/2012 18:13, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Any of you who are expereincing problems with packets dropped due to
invalid checksums with IPv6 and pf after the recent merges, can you
report back if you also see this without modulate state in your
pf.conf
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Just for the public; I am talking to him privately currently; I'll
summarize findings either here or in a commit message.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new
,
Bjoern
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
this year, given
8.3 has been available for at least 3 months then. Also 8.3 is an
extended release supported until 2014.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do
Please correct me, if there is a better solution.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
these
things up automatically once they go to 8.3 or 9.0.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
the problem? I'm new to freenas/BSD but am willing to try working from the
Cmd line.
ntpd in head 9.0 and later and 8.3 and later should not exhibit that problem
anymore as it was fixed. Could you please tell me if that is not the case?
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have
On 2. May 2012, at 05:11 , Jason Hellenthal wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 09:01:33PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 1. May 2012, at 19:41 , David Thiel wrote:
Hello,
So, I've been trying to debug an issue running nmap scans within jails,
partially documented here:
http
.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
?
Without thinking too much (as in if I got the right case) I think you are
hitting this one:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/net/rtsock.c?annotate=234572#l792
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter how good you
On 22. Apr 2012, at 21:59 , Adrian Wontroba wrote:
A RELENG_8 system built this morning still identifies itself as
8.3-PRERELEASE.
Any chance of this becoming 8.3-STABLE soon? While this is entirely
cosmetic, it does cause me issues at $JOB.
Fixed.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
in an earlier pre-release announcement.
I assume once it's released, this will be updated:
http://www.freebsd.org/security/#sup
Which it was yesterday along with the release.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter how good you
to fix ipsec-tools or your ike daemon. If you do the latter I can commit
the former.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!
___
freebsd-stable
am not
sure we ever allowed compiling with BURN_BRIDGES set but I can change the
#ifndef to THIS_IS_PART_OF_THE_PUBLIC_STABLE_KPI or something if needed.
See the comment above it:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/8/sys/netinet6/in6_src.c?annotate=232552#l820
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
long
they'll have to wait? For that matter, is it a stock 9.0 or your own kernel?
What other modules are loaded?
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do
)
- IPFIREWALL_FORWARD (touches every packet, power users which need
a bigger PPS but not this feature can recompile the kernel,
discussed with julian@)
- FLOWTABLE (disabled in loader.conf)
Which is not the same as it's not 100% disabled and will still allocate memory.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
wonder if someone wants to provide a user branch in SVN to
provide regular patchsets for stable/9 and maybe even stable/8 (8.3R)
to help people not going to HEAD?
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you
, once we upgrade our jail setup VIMAGE will be also a must.
I have read that multiple times already and I'd love to but that's a looong way.
The plan might be to one day provide a 2nd kernel to install from and that
freebsd-update can handle but we'll see.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
as a module (SW_WATCHDOG comes to my mind)? If yes, which ones
and how important are they for you?
As a lot of the results will show... various parts of the network stack being
loadable, which is not as easy as it sounds, especially making them unloadable
again currently ...
/bz
--
Bjoern
hang on boot?
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
a try which
might make your life easier...
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/2011-July/thread.html#1568
I am sure Jamie would like feedback and now that 9.0 is done get review
and get it in...
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions
permission denied.
Also it looks a bit strange:
===
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
.
I'll try and get some time to retest and provide some proper
results.
Thanks. If you do please try the bundled version in 8-STABLE or 9 and
also gather the usual meta data (latency, packet loss, IPv4/v6, any
socket buffer tuning, ...).
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
, but this was certainly the case on 8.2.
8.2 did not shipped them so you had installed them yourself?
What kind of performance degradations and in which kind of environment
an how noticeable?
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter
can MFC the knobs; they are part of the other 50 possible
MFCs in my mailbox to do; I had just planned to wait on the entire stable/9/8/7
sweep to go by first.
There was also a follow-up fix from me on this...
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions
On 4. Jan 2012, at 19:40 , John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:09:44 pm Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 4. Jan 2012, at 18:01 , John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 12:50:38 pm Jason Hellenthal wrote:
After this change I am recieving the attached error log.
My
://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/usr.sbin/jail/jail.8?r1=221665r2=224286
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
to have
gone un-heeded. :) I'm sure you can take bz' word that it's being
looked at now though.
It's been fixed and the changes should propagate to cvsup mirrors close
to everyone the next two hours.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit
On 20. Dec 2011, at 10:01 , Claude Buisson wrote:
It seems (from my own csup's and cvswe.cgi) that the src commits are lost,
starting with r228697 Sun Dec 18 22:04:55 2011)
What is going on (or off) ?
Re $subject -- yes. It will be worked on.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
for normal
merge procedure.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
On 11/16/11 08:43, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
we have seen this or a very similar panic for about 1 year now once in
a while and I think I reported it before; this is FreeBSD as guest on
vmware. Seems it was a double panic this time. Could
*ata_completed+0x727
489 (request-callback)(request);
490 else
491 sema_post(request-done);
492
493 /* only call ata_start if channel is present */
494 if (ch)
495 ata_start(ch-dev);
496 }
497
498 void
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
)?
net.enc.in.ipsec_bpf_mask=0x0003
net.enc.in.ipsec_filter_mask=0x0003
Any hints on the PF rules required to allow those packets in ?
need more details (if you want also off-list).
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin
to help that, which
are partly (mostly, all these days) existent in newer upstream version
(esepcially the latest devels).
I'll go an look in my 70 oustanding MFCs.
Would be cool if you could test 9 temporary and see if things are
better there.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
and the fix could possibly be merges to 8 from there then
but knowing that just this fix applied to stable/8 works would be good for that.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family
area in svn with an
older version of a backport but I am not sure if it was ever updated again.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
___
freebsd
on the branch would be good.
I would assume that if you have both machines running the newer kernel
and would start ping6 from both things would also start working
immediately.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin
and tries]
No, that doesnt work - they both hang for a while and eventually start.
Ok, then it's even les obvious than what I thought. I'll keep you
updated.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address
On Apr 17, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011, Pete French wrote:
I assume both are stable/8? Are you sure on the Feb 25th kernel
doing ok or could it be that you are just more lucky?
I've rolled everything back now to a kernel from April 1st - that
works OK
Hi,
this is a heads up in case anyone is relying on this in private VNET
modules or code. I am planning on merging this code to stable/8
probably during the weekend. It should be a NOP for almost everyone,
especially if not running a VIMAGE kernel.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
to spend more time on it
:: if you send me an email.
So if anyone of you is still using NATM, please follow-up with me to
keep your functionality. If there is no feedback NATM is still
scheduled for removal.
Thank you.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have
=196789view=markup
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
ks Going to jail sucks -- bz All my daemons like it!
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
to support that exact chip.
Probably needs some special initialization and a couple of if ()s, as
usual.
LSI/Dell are the people to talk to.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
ks Going to jail sucks -- bz All my daemons like it!
http
-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
ks Going to jail sucks -- bz All my daemons like it!
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html
___
freebsd
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
ks Going to jail sucks -- bz All my daemons like it!
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
in with the MFC or r215207.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
ks Going to jail sucks -- bz All my daemons like it!
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
just to get this out. Jack you might want to review and if ok, include
in HEAD before we get feedback maybe. To my understanding worst it
would be overhead but not really harm.
Oct 22 02:06:02 i4 kernel: em1: discard frame w/o packet header
'
*** Error code 1
That would be mine though a universe had successfully completed with
the merge.
I'll go and look.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life.
ks Going to jail sucks -- bz All my daemons like it!
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi David,
Now, I actually build for the system in question on my build machine
(which builds a GENERIC kernel for itself, as well as kernels for the
above-mentioned machine and another).
This morning, it was running FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE r214547
private report just now
on this one; is any of you by chance running VLANs on the systems
you see this happening?
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life.
ks Going to jail sucks -- bz All my daemons like it!
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1
of 2) above.
The jail(8) documentation (mine lists FreeBSD 8.1 January 17, 2010)
seems to be missing documentation on the vnet command (due to the
experimental status)?
Right, vnets are still considered experimental.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage
+0xe
--- trap 0, rip = 0, rsp = 0xff85ad30, rbp = 0 ---
db
Mike, as you found that in a lab setup and I was never able to
reproduce any of the reports before, I'll send you a patch over
the weekend and we'll see if you can still reproduce it after
patching.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
. ifconfig -l however had shown eth0 twice. Neither is really
what one would expect thus needs changing.
/bz
PS: freebsd-virtualization@ is the best list to report VIMAGE or
vnet related problems.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
2) I am (was) still running C4B on amd64 on RELENG_8 with a privately
hacked together capi call log, which is a hack without me even
thinking about capi (specs) when doing it, but was doing the job
for me for 7 and 8. Getting the last C4B
and maybe add a bit for extra safety?
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
' '--with-randomdev=/dev/random'
+.if ${MK_INET6_SUPPORT} == no
+CONFIGARGS+='--disable-ipv6'
+.endif
# Optional features
.if ${MK_BIND_LARGE_FILE} == yes
and leave it to the user to build world without INET6 support if (s)he
build the kernel without it?
Thanks,
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
. If someone fixes the infrastructure and 1 driver I'll
also happily ship them so (s)he can do the others as well and test
and maintain things for the next couple of years.
Pick your poison;-)
HTH
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life
havent seen it on the
other LNS boxes that have the same setup, except no ipv6. It was happily
running for a few days until this error started showing up ?
I thought this was fixed already but maybe only in HEAD and not
merged. I'll go and look.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
patches
now but it'll be anohter few days till I'll get to that.
/bz
PS: freebsd-virtualization@ might be the better place to post VIMAGE
problems.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb This signature is about you not me.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
I think your comments (and patches) are better sent there, rather than
to sta...@.
Gruesse,
Bjern
--
Bjoern A. ZeebFrom August on I will have a life. It's now up to you
to do the maths and count to 64. -- Bondorf, Germany, 14th June 2010
indeed should no happen.
Is the kernel and the core file still avail for further analyses?
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what you are doing.___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
r206469,206470,206481 applied to 8-STABLE.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what you are doing.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Denis Lamanov wrote:
Hi,
vmstat -m | grep lltable
every 3 minutes increases :(
lltable 16938 2149K -17779 128,256
I'll MFC the patches to fix that the next couple of days, maybe
tommorow morning. In case you want
by providing additional info?
Looking at the info I doubt it's related to jails or Pg in first
place. Have you been running that same setup already before your Apr
1st, r206031, kernel? If so, from when was your last kernel?
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what you
hadn't realized before that your
r206031 seems to be in the middle of a multi-commit merge from two
people.
It would be worth to update to the latest stable/8 and try again
first.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what you are doing
.
The panic does not occur with the same kernel compiled without options
VIMAGE.
FAQ from virtualization@ ; pf support for VIMAGE only basically exists
here: http://svn.freebsd.org/base/user/eri/pf45/head/
but is not fully ready either.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what you are doing.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
will asume so, that
would mean that you D my mac would initiate the connection and
the A node L2tp server would then be the other end. If that's a
FreeBSD box as well, you should check statistics there. The NAT
gateway in between has nothing to do with this, only the IPsec ends.
/bz
--
Bjoern
the version on stable/8 so it should be fine now.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what you are doing.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
, how did you start the jail? jls -av output might be
interesting.
/bz
PS: there is a freebsd-jail list as well.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what you are doing.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
8.0 RELEASE or the
9-CURRENT development branch.
Should no valid complaints come up saying that someone needs (and
actively uses *cough* PECOFF support on FreeBSD it'll be removed
earliest Novemeber 29th 2009 00:00 UTC (in about one week).
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you
earlier.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what you are doing.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr
a lot of sense but it
seems that for the long term we'll have to support it, as parts of the
other world support it as well, and once we support it even old
packages will then continue to work even if people disable
mapping_at_zero or if the release by default does that.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
/advisories/FreeBSD-EN-09:05.null.asc
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb It will not break if you know what you are doing.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd
-sparc64-dvd1.iso) =
777d8afc3330fae4089510d6b852ea1d1f9108a868b8ebb3d5a661b108a99196
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb What was I talking about and who are you again?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
the address.
I cannot say if it'll work but it would be worth a try.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb What was I talking about and who are you again?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 09:42:03PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to run a make universe on RELENG_6 and found:
1) alpha doesn't build
2) powerpc LINT fails with:
config: Error: device zs is unknown
3) sparc64 LINT fails
anyone could confirm these findings (or fix them should they
exist) that would be great.
I had run:
make -j8 universe __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb What was I talking about and who are you again?
___
freebsd-stable
be there? Is it something in jexec
that gets the errno in first place or is it something internal to
malloc that sets it returns successfully and doesn't clear it?
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.
___
freebsd
://www.freebsdfoundation.org/donate/
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr
a crash, a few people on freebsd-jail@ who
had been using it.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
itself or is it a bug?
It seems to me as undesirable.
it is (undesirable) and it seems to be a bug as even if you do
host# cpuset -l 0 -r -j 25
you can get back to 0,1 from within the jail.
I'll check how/why this is possible.
/bz
PS: moving this to freebsd-jail@
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
together and get you a diff.
With that I'd expect you to either hit a KASSERT or a pnic.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
