On Wednesday 23 of November 2005 01:11, Joel Hatton wrote:
Joel Hatton wrote:
What was the rationale behind changing this behaviour for 206_1?
That xterm should install as xterm and not xterm-static.
This is certainly sensible, however it appears that the onus has now been
put on the
On Wednesday 23 of November 2005 01:11, Joel Hatton wrote:
[snip]
# pkg_info -I xorg-clients\*
xorg-clients-6.8.2_1 X client programs and related files from X.Org
# portupgrade -p xterm
... (building)
--- Installing the new version via the port
=== Installing for xterm-206_1
===
Joel Hatton wrote:
What was the rationale behind changing this behaviour for 206_1?
That xterm should install as xterm and not xterm-static.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
On Wednesday 16 of November 2005 04:26, James Long wrote:
After hours of head-banging over the past couple of days,
I have finally succeeded in installing EITHER
xorg-clients-6.8.2_1 OR xterm-206_1. Previously,
installing either port told me that it conflicted
with the other, in spite of
Gary Kline wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 10:41:33PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Saturday, 26. February 2005 22:19, Gary Kline wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 09:49:00PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Saturday, 26. February 2005 13:05, Godwin Stewart wrote:
On Sat, 26 Feb
