On 5/21/09 4:15 PM, Kip Macy wrote:
Your snapshots are using two thirds of your used capacity. 'df' only
knows about the mounted file system.
Cheers,
Kip
On that subject, if anyone isn't aware this version of zfs has nicer
space accounting.
you should check out the output of
zfs list -o
On 5/15/09 8:02 PM, Kip Macy wrote:
I've MFC'd ZFS v13 to RELENG_7 in a work branch. Please test if you can.
http://svn.freebsd.org/base/user/kmacy/ZFS_MFC/
The standard disclaimers apply. This has only been lightly tested in a
VM. Please do not use it with data you care about at this time.
Xin LI wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dr. Aharon Friedman wrote:
(note the fact that
/ can not be easily rolled back to previous state using ZFS's snapshot
feature, and can not be easily switched between clones
I actually keep a full minimal install on my UFS
I'm very excited and can't wait! I have this clone I need to promote but
I'm encountering this bug
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6738349
Hopefully it gets mfc before the diff between the real fs and the clone
becomes so large that my pool fills up :-)
I should have a few
There's nothing you can do right now except for wait. By default the zfs
implementation on osx will create a zfs version 6 zpool (to retain
compat with the read-only kext that ships with 10.5) but once you've
upgraded you can't go back.
There is a newer version of zfs for freebsd but it
