Re: Portsnap no updates since 3/31/2021 ?

On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 06:49:17AM -0400, Robert Blayzor via freebsd-stable wrote: > I have several servers running 11.4 and 12.2 that do nightly portsnap > updates and the last time they've seen anything new is 3/31/2021, since > then, nothing. > > This seems highly unusual since seems like

Re: possibly silly question regarding freebsd-update

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:55:24AM -0400, Karl Denninger wrote: > > On 3/30/2021 11:22, Guido Falsi via freebsd-stable wrote: > > On 30/03/21 15:35, tech-lists wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Recently there was > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2021-March/010380.html > > >

Re: Cisco 12G SAS RAID support (FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE) ?

On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 11:38:54AM -0500, Chris Ross wrote: > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 02:28:17PM -0800, Doug Ambrisko wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 09:44:36PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > | Chris Ross wrote on 11/05/2019 21:19: > > | > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 08:20:15PM +0100, Miroslav

Re: Trouble booting from EFI with 12-stable

On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 03:47:45PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 3:22 PM Gary Palmer wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 01:18:35PM -0600, Kyle Evans wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 1:15 PM Jonathan Chen wrote: > > > > > > &

Re: Trouble booting from EFI with 12-stable

On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 01:18:35PM -0600, Kyle Evans wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 1:15 PM Jonathan Chen wrote: > > > > On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 at 07:55, Stefan Bethke wrote: > > [...] > > > The UEFI man page has a good explanation of which files are involved in > > > booting: > > >

Re: syslogd became silent between 11.2-PRERELEASE r334874 and r335282

On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 04:27:33PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote: > Hi, > > I am running service jails (VNET/bridge/epair) and a host at 11.2-PRERELEASE > r335282, upgraded from r334874 today. > > All syslog messages at each jail become forwarded to syslogd running at the > host. This setup

Re: i386 nanobsd w/11.1-RELEASE-p10

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 04:05:24AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On 19.05.2018 20:46, Gary Palmer wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I haven't tried building an i386 image with nanobsd since 8.x or 9.x, > > so apologies if this is a known issue > > > &

i386 nanobsd w/11.1-RELEASE-p10

Hi, I haven't tried building an i386 image with nanobsd since 8.x or 9.x, so apologies if this is a known issue I've tried to build an i386 nanobsd using nanobsd on an amd64 host, and when that didn't work in an i386 jail on an amd64 host, and now in an i386 vm. The i386 vm is failing with

Re: KBI unexpexted change in stable/11 ?

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:16:49AM -0500, Eric van Gyzen wrote: > On 03/28/2018 10:35, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:29:10AM -0500, Eric van Gyzen wrote: > > > >> On 03/28/2018 08:09, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > >>> I am upgrade system to latest -STABLE and now see

Re: FreeBSD 11.1,11-stable,12-current on Dell H740p raid

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 05:15:53PM +0100, Albert Shih wrote: > Hi, > > > I got issue with Dell PowerEdge R740/R640 server with H740p and FreeBSD > 11.1-Release, 11-stable, 12-current > > In all version I don't able to find the raid controler, so no disk...so of > course impossible to install

Re: Odd behaviour on recent boot of 11.1 with timecounters

On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 02:41:37PM -0800, Chris H wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 16:45:26 +0000 "Gary Palmer" <gpal...@freebsd.org> said > > > On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 06:47:38PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 03:49:13PM +, G

Re: Odd behaviour on recent boot of 11.1 with timecounters

On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 06:47:38PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 03:49:13PM +0000, Gary Palmer wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 04:51:47PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 02:17:08PM +, Gary Palmer wrote: &

Re: Odd behaviour on recent boot of 11.1 with timecounters

On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 04:51:47PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 02:17:08PM +0000, Gary Palmer wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I recently updated to 11.1-RELEASE-p6 and on the most recent reboot > > (after rebuilding all the necessar

Odd behaviour on recent boot of 11.1 with timecounters

Hi, I recently updated to 11.1-RELEASE-p6 and on the most recent reboot (after rebuilding all the necessary packages) the clock was running slow and NTP wouldn't sync. I looked in /var/log/messages and I found that for some reason, on this latest boot, it got the frequency of TSC-low wrong.

Re: System fails to boot with zfs root on nvme mirror when not using full disks

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 05:13:45PM +0200, Markus Wild wrote: > Hello list, > > I have a particularly odd problem, where I can't figure out what's going on, > or whether I'm possibly doing something > stupid... > > Short summary: > - Supermicro X10DRI-T motherboard, using UEFI boot, 128G RAM, 2

Re: Fwd: ports index after upgrade 10.4 --> 11.1Stable ?

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 12:59:17PM +0200, Werner Griessl wrote: > No answer on ports, next try stable > Werner > Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 15:48:51 +0200 > From: Werner Griessl > To: freebsd-po...@freebsd.org > Subject: ports index after upgrade 10.4 --> 11.1Stable ?

Re: 11.0 and tw_cli fail

% file tw_cli tw_cli: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), statically linked, for FreeBSD 5.4, stripped Try COMPAT_FREEBSD5 Regards, Gary On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 03:55:03PM -0600, CBL wrote: > Yeah, I have a custom kernel with COMPAT_FREEBSD10 already in it and no > joy.

Re: Jailed periodic daily scripts smashing CPU

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:47:23AM -0600, Dustin Wenz wrote: > If I needed to go down the road of spreading out the daily maintenance over a > longer period of time, I'd probably use your solution of building in a delay > based on the jail id, or possibly Guy Tabrar's extreme jitter example. >

Re: zfs snapshot_limit is not respected

em change that property. Regards, Gary > Thanks for replying, > Ultima > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Gary Palmer <gpal...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 09:31:58PM -0500, Ultima wrote: > > > I recently moved some data on a box wi

Re: zfs snapshot_limit is not respected

On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 09:31:58PM -0500, Ultima wrote: > I recently moved some data on a box with limited space. I decided I should > limit the snapshots so that space would not become an issue. I just check > back a week later to find out the box is hitting the borderline. Doing I > quick check

Re: Boot partition size

On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 03:15:19PM +1100, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > As recently as last October, the best official advice was to make a 64kB boot > partition. > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/action/diff/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/Mirror?action=diff=16=17 > > > Now that turns out to be absolutely

Re: usb 3.0 thumb drive speed limit

On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 11:27:49AM +0300, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote: > I wonder is there a speed limit on usb 3.0? I've bought > > ugen0.4: at usbus0 > umass2 on uhub7 > umass2: on usbus0 > da2 at umass-sim2 bus 2 scbus9 target 0 lun 0 > da2: Removable Direct Access SPC-4 SCSI device > da2:

Re: [ZFS] files in a weird situtation

On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 11:25:41PM +0100, David Marec wrote: > On 17.12.2016 22:15, Brandon Allbery wrote: > > > > You have a directory entry pointing at a freed inode (or zfs equivalent). > > ZFS may have mapped this inode that points to nowhere. That makes sense. > > In this case, what should

Re: sonewconn: pcb [...]: Listen queue overflow to human-readable form

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 05:27:02PM +0200, Artem Viklenko wrote: > 2016-12-15 14:28, Eugene Grosbein ??: > > On 15.12.2016 19:23, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > > > >> but at the time of investigation the socket is already closed and lsof > >> cannot show me the owner. I wonder if the

Re: Help! two machines ran out of swap and corrupted their zpools!

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 05:47:29PM +, Pete French wrote: > So, I am off sick and my colleagues decided to load test our set of five > servers excesively. All ran out of swap. So far so irritating, but whats has > happened is that twoof them now will not boot, as it appears the ZFS pool > they

Re: 11.0 Install Question

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 01:55:23PM -0400, Kevin P. Neal wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:08:04AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 2016/10/19 09:55, Matt Smith wrote: > > > On Oct 19 10:38, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > >> Jonathan Haack wrote on 2016/10/19 10:09: > > >>> Awe geez ... pkg won't

Re: zfs/raidz: seems like I'm failing with math

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 09:56:10PM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi. > > FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 r303979, zfs raidz1: > > ===Cut=== > > # zpool status gamestop >pool: gamestop > state: ONLINE >scan: none requested > config: > > NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM >

Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 01:13:35AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:04:20PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > > > On 09/15/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:43:06PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > > > > > > > On 09/15/16 at

Re: Problems with piped tar

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 02:27:46PM +0200, Gerhard Schmidt wrote: > Am 23.08.2016 um 13:31 schrieb Gary Palmer: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 09:35:12AM +0200, Gerhard Schmidt wrote: > >> Am 23.08.2016 um 09:18 schrieb Daniel Braniss: > >>> > >>>> On

Re: Problems with piped tar

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 09:35:12AM +0200, Gerhard Schmidt wrote: > Am 23.08.2016 um 09:18 schrieb Daniel Braniss: > > > >> On 23 Aug 2016, at 10:06, Gerhard Schmidt wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> i'm quite often use tar to copy files using > >> > >> tar cf - /some/dir | (cd

Re: LSI SAS2008 mps driver preferred firmware version

On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 01:18:14PM +0100, Kai Gallasch wrote: > On 12.11.2015 23:20 Royce Williams wrote: > > Firmware should match driver, e.g.: > > > > mps0: Firmware: 19.00.00.00, Driver: 19.00.00.00-fbs > > > > > > Some of this may help -- not yet updated for 10.2, but may still be useful:

Re: Interesting Boot failure on HEAD with a large number of IGB nics

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:20:06PM -0400, Mark Saad wrote: On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneurab...@gmail.com wrote: On Jul 22, 2015, at 10:14, Gary Palmer gpal...@freebsd.org wrote: ... I'm no expert, but you may want to try setting hw.igb.num_queues=1

Re: Interesting Boot failure on HEAD with a large number of IGB nics

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:11:09PM -0400, Mark Saad wrote: All I am wondering if anyone has run into this issue before , and if there is a fix. I have a Scalable Informatics siRouter with 24 Intel I350 igb nics and 8 intel 82599ES ixgbe/ix nic . The SiRouter is a Supermicro X9DRX+-F with a

Re: Many core dumps in pthread_getspecific.

On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 06:08:21PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 09:50:22AM +0200, Andre Meiser wrote: On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 16:58 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: You should recompile both libc and libthr with debugging symbols, like cd /usr/src (cd

Re: Is there a linux_base available for RELENG_9?

On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 05:44:55PM -0700, Chris H wrote: I performed av svn update for both src (r279796), and ports (r380829) last night. building/installing world/kernel, went as one would hope. Upgrading ports was a different story. Given this box has an nVidia card. I usually start by

Re: Is there a linux_base available for RELENG_9?

On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 06:09:04PM -0700, Chris H wrote: On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:51:06 + Gary Palmer gpal...@freebsd.org wrote On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 05:44:55PM -0700, Chris H wrote: I performed av svn update for both src (r279796), and ports (r380829) last night. building

Re: FreeBSD 9-Stable + Atom D510 Freeze

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:12:09AM -0400, Thomas Laus wrote: Tom, I have had multiple D510's and now D525's that are part of my test systems, all are 4GB machines and all run the latest (ie 2 days old) 9.X Stable. They're faultless. I have a D510 in production serving 30 users - yes

Re: FreeBSD 9-Stable + Atom D510 Freeze

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:49:28AM -0400, Thomas Laus wrote: Gary Palmer [gpal...@freebsd.org] wrote: When building kernel world do you use the '-j' argument to do parallel builds? AFAIK thats not done by default, but it is for some ports. Gary: I just use the system defaults when

Re: Listen queue overflow

On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 10:47:40AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: After upgrading from a RELENG9 kernel from June 18th to July 27th, I am seeing this odd new message. Is this a new bug, or just a new diagnostic message ? I am guessing it happened after r253035 ? sonewconn: pcb

Re: Interpreting MCA error output

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:47:43PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! Approx. two years ago there was a thread on -stable about MCA output. See http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2011-October/064083.html for a post from Jeremy Chadwick with a link to a AMD paper on that

Re: Problems booting into ZFS on recent stable/9

On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 02:49:35PM -0400, Chris Ross wrote: I had a sparc64 (Netra X1) running a stable/9 from late March 2013. Actually, the kernel may've been a bit newer than that as I was working with folks to diagnose and repair some Netra-X1 specific issues. But, ZFS worked

Re: ZFS stalls -- and maybe we should be talking about defaults?

On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 12:40:38AM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: In article 8c68812328e3483ba9786ef155911...@multiplay.co.uk, kill...@multiplay.co.uk writes: Now interesting you should say that I've seen a stall recently on ZFS only box running on 6 x SSD RAIDZ2. The stall was caused by

Re: some issues with /usr/sbin/service

On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 05:38:56PM +, Chris Rees wrote: On 16 February 2013 17:05, Paul Mather p...@gromit.dlib.vt.edu wrote: On Feb 16, 2013, at 4:21 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:23:33PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: 16.02.2013 01:32, Jeremy Chadwick

Re: some issues with /usr/sbin/service

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:57:10AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:26:11AM +0100, Alfred Bartsch wrote: we want to use this script for server administration purposes. After doing some testing, for now there are following issues left: 1) every execution of service

Re: some issues with /usr/sbin/service

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 01:20:20PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:32:10PM -0500, Gary Palmer wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:57:10AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:26:11AM +0100, Alfred Bartsch wrote: we want to use this script

Re: bge numbering

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 05:47:39PM +0200, Daniel Braniss wrote: On Friday, January 25, 2013 3:46:10 am Daniel Braniss wrote: Hi, this server, a Dell R720 has 4 bge on board, Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x572 bge0: APE FW version: NCSI v1.1.7.0

Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas?

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 08:06:24PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote: At 04:29 PM 12/10/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote: There's politics in every organisation. There are ego clashes in every organisation. Sometimes you'll fit in,

Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas?

to the mirrors. FreeBSD update is still not updated. Does someone just need to just update the wiki with the relevant info ? On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Gary Palmer gpal...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 08:06:24PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:52 PM

Re: Library Problem

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:46:51PM -0800, Doug Hardie wrote: On 28 November 2012, at 20:01, Devin Teske wrote: On Nov 28, 2012, at 7:36 PM, Doug Hardie wrote: I have installed 4 systems from the same FreeBSD 9.1-RC3 disk. Three of them worked just fine. The last one is causing

Re: Increasing the DMESG buffer....

On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:14:59PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: On 22 November 2012 06:30, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote: Neither ICH, nor any other driver I know have amount of information comparable to what

Re: bge on the new Mac Mini

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:54:00AM -0500, Richard Kuhns wrote: On 11/16/12 10:41, Alfred Perlstein wrote: Often that is all that is needed. It's worth a shot and reporting back. Do you know how to update the table in the driver, rebuild/install kernel and check? -Alfred I'm

Re: bge on the new Mac Mini

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 11:27:17AM -0500, Richard Kuhns wrote: On 11/16/12 11:20, Gary Palmer wrote: On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:54:00AM -0500, Richard Kuhns wrote: On 11/16/12 10:41, Alfred Perlstein wrote: Often that is all that is needed. It's worth a shot and reporting back. Do you

Re: [patch] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO

On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:41:31PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote: On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:30:04PM +0100, Bas Smeelen wrote: On 11/02/2012 07:17 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote: On 11/02/2012 07:08 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote: On 11/02/2012 06:27 PM, Adam Strohl wrote: On 11/3/2012 0:13, Mike Jakubik

Re: 9.1-RC2 - could it be that the installer does not write the MBR?

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:38:41PM +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote: Am Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:32:49 -0700 schrieb Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org: Guys/girls/etc, I do suggest that someone actually spends some time coming up with a table of what the current state is, what we could do, what

Re: Clang as default compiler

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 07:12:50PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:02:20AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-09-17 21:43, Roland Smith wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:04:20AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: ... For most of the failures, we are already aware of

Re: FreeBSD 8-STABLE on R620 w/ X520-DA2/Intel 82599

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:50:52AM -0400, Rick Miller wrote: Hi All, I have 2 hosts, HP DL360 G8 and Dell R620. Both have the X520-DA2/Intel 82599 10G Fiber NIC. Both also have the same FreeBSD 8-STABLE image. The Dell displays the following in dmesg and we are unable to configure the

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?

On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 05:12:14PM -0700, Dave Hayes wrote: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com writes: If you are NOT using FreeBSD for any area or some areas , would you please list those areas with most important first to least important last ? 1) I don't use FreeBSD for

Re: Why Are You Using FreeBSD?

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 04:22:37PM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote: On 5/31/12 4:01 PM, Jim Ohlstein wrote: To add others, in no particular order: Ease of upgrade. While some have noted that binary upgrades are easier on Debian, it's far and away superior, IMMHO, to have a locally compiled

Re: FreeBSD 9.0 hangs on heavy I/O

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Kees Jan Koster wrote: Dear All, I seem to have a problem where really heavy disk I/O is drowning my machine. I see hangs in the shell where I am logged on using ssh. Network connections get dropped for no apparent reason and some HTTP requests are

Re: FreeBSD 9.0 hangs on heavy I/O

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:59:58PM +0200, Kees Jan Koster wrote: Dear Gary, # camcontrol devlist WDC WD740ADFD-00NLR1 20.07P20at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,ada0) WDC WD740GD-00FLC0 33.08F33 at scbus2 target 0 lun 0 (pass1,ada1) WDC WD740GD-00FLC0 33.08F33 at scbus3

Re: 157k interrupts per second causing 60% CPU load on idle system

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:10:10PM +1030, Matt Thyer wrote: On 20 March 2012 22:24, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote: On 20 March 2012 12:52, Matt Thyer matt.th...@gmail.com wrote: On 20 March 2012 21:12, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote: On 20/03/2012 06:26, Matt Thyer wrote:

Re: disk devices speed is ugly

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 07:36:25AM +0100, Alex Samorukov wrote: On 02/13/2012 06:27 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: On 12 February 2012 09:34, Alex Samorukovm...@os2.kiev.ua wrote: Yes. But it will nit fix non-cached access to the disk (raw) devices. And this is the main reason why ntfs-3g and

Re: disk devices speed is ugly

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 03:50:36PM +0100, Alex Samorukov wrote: On 02/13/2012 02:28 PM, Gary Palmer wrote: Yes. But it will nit fix non-cached access to the disk (raw) devices. And this is the main reason why ntfs-3g and exfat are much slower then working on Linux. But _that_ can

Re: siisch1: Error while READ LOG EXT

On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 07:22:40AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: I have to assume that devices connected on a port multiplier show up on a separate scbusX number. This is from your original mail: # camcontrol devlist WDC WD2001FASS-00U0B0 01.00101 at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,ada0)

Re: zfs arc and amount of wired memory

On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:18:02PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 08/02/2012 22:50 Jeremy Chadwick said the following: Politely -- recommending this to a user is a good choice of action, but the problem is that no user, even an experienced user, is going to know what all of the Types (vmstat

Re: Panic on 7.4-RELEASE-p5

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 01:29:23PM +0100, Peter Maloney wrote: On 01/27/2012 04:43 AM, Gary Palmer wrote: After scanning selected spans, do NOT read-scan remainder of disk. If Selective self-test is pending on power-up, resume after 0 minute delay. I noticed a while ago

Re: Panic on 7.4-RELEASE-p5

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 08:41:38PM -0500, Gary Palmer wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 01:29:23PM +0100, Peter Maloney wrote: On 01/27/2012 04:43 AM, Gary Palmer wrote: After scanning selected spans, do NOT read-scan remainder of disk. If Selective self-test is pending on power-up

Panic on 7.4-RELEASE-p5

Hi, My Soekris firewall just panic'd Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x14001d fault code = supervisor write, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc06fd2d3 stack pointer = 0x28:0xd63557bc frame pointer =

Re: Panic on 7.4-RELEASE-p5

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 09:48:15PM -0500, Gary Palmer wrote: Hi, My Soekris firewall just panic'd [snip] I think this has happened on this box before (or a similar incident anyway, I didn't have the console wired up the last time so I didn't get the above trace). Just found old daily

Re: Panic on 7.4-RELEASE-p5

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 07:09:06PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 09:48:15PM -0500, Gary Palmer wrote: Hi, My Soekris firewall just panic'd Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x14001d fault code = supervisor

Re: Panic on 7.4-RELEASE-p5

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 07:13:51PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 07:09:06PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 09:48:15PM -0500, Gary Palmer wrote: Hi, My Soekris firewall just panic'd Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode

Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool

On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 08:55:35PM +0200, George Kontostanos wrote: On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: On 23/12/2011 18:05, George Kontostanos wrote: Are all cvs mirror servers updated regarding these changes ? ANYBODY Should

Re: re unix browser problem

On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 10:36:00AM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote: On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 04:04:43PM +0200, kapral wrote: On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:46:57 -0400, Jason Hellenthal jh...@dataix.net wrote: On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 02:39:43PM +0200, kapral wrote: it might be caused by

Re: valgrind on FreeBSD?

On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 11:06:04PM +0200, V??clav Zeman wrote: Hi. No matter what I try, valgrind on 7.3-STABLE is giving me this, both Valgrind ports: valgrind: Startup or configuration error: Can't establish current working directory at startup valgrind: Unable to start up properly.

Re: 7-stable: Root mount problem (mpt, probing / timing related)

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:41:58PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: Hi, I've updated a server with mpt controller to the latest 7-stable (ok, it's 7-stable from last week). During the boot sequence, the disk connected to the mpt controller (da0) seems to be probed too late, i.e. just _after_

Re: ZFS directory with a large number of files

On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 08:56:36PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: On 08/05/2011 20:38, Daniel O'Connor wrote: Ahh, but OP had moved these files away and performance was still poor.. _that_ is the bug. I'm no file system expert, but it seems to me the key questions are; how long does it take

Re: 9.0 B1 Panic

On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 02:58:09PM +0400, Lystopad Olexandr wrote: Hello, Martin Wilke! On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:41:29PM +0800 m...@freebsd.org wrote about 9.0 B1 Panic: 9.0 Beta1 Panic Hi guys, I just downloaded and install 9.0 BETA1 but it panics on ACPI. Please view

Re: Status of support for 4KB disk sectors

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 08:48:54PM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote: On Jul 19, 2011, at 8:14 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 02:39:28AM -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: IIRC, Plextor (and maybe some others) had a switch to select 512 or 2048 as the default transfer size,

Re: OS X Lion time machine = (afpd|iSCSI) = ZFS question

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 02:56:17PM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote: I am in no hurry to upgrade my MBP to OS X Lion but given Lion time machine and netatalk issues, I got wondering if iSCSI on FreeBSD is stable enough for time machine use. How much duct tape and baling wire are needed to make it

Re: Constant rebooting after power loss

On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 12:55:15PM -0400, David Magda wrote: On Apr 1, 2011, at 23:35, Matthew Dillon wrote: The solution to this first item is for the OS/filesystem to issue a disk flush command to the drive at appropriate times. If I recall the ZFS implementation in FreeBSD

Re: Strange performance issue with grep -r -i as non-root user

On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 03:45:14PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: This is a strange one, and the more I started debugging it (starting with truss, comparing fast vs. slow results, where all that appears different is read() operations are taking a lot longer -- I haven't had time to check with

Re: geom_label, fstab without device names swap partition?

On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 09:02:01PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, Stable. Now, with newfs -L name, geom_label and /dev/ufs/* it is possible to not use device names for FSes in /etc/fstab at all. But what to do with swap partitions? How to say, that I want swap on /dev/ada0s1b or

Re: ZFS - moving from a zraid1 to zraid2 pool with 1.5tb disks

On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 05:42:49PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 12:29:17PM +1100, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: On 6 January 2011 22:26, Chris Forgeron cforge...@acsi.ca wrote: You know, these days I'm not as happy with SSD's for ZIL. I may blog about some of the

Re: ZFS - moving from a zraid1 to zraid2 pool with 1.5tb disks

On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 08:20:00PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: HyperDrive 5M (DDR2-based; US$299) 1) Product documentation claims that the drive has built-in ECC so you can use non-ECC DDR2 DIMMs -- this doesn't make sense to me from a technical

Re: Make ZFS auto-destroy snapshots when the out of space?

On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 08:33:40PM -0400, David Magda wrote: On May 29, 2010, at 16:07, Kirk Strauser wrote: I'd propose standardizing on an attribute like org.freebsd:allowautodestroy. Modify ZFS's disk full behavior [...] Also run a daily periodic script to ensure that the free space

Re: Incorrect super block

On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 12:43:24PM +0100, Harald Weis wrote: I solved this problem for myself by installing MacFuse MacFuse is not yet available for Snow Leopard (10.6). Not entirely correct. MacFuse is not available for Snow Leopard when booting a 64 bit kernel. Apparently it works fine

Re: Dell PowerEdge Virtual Media

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:26:41PM +, Scott Mitchell wrote: So it appears to work if I force the starting sector to be zero. I see the same result with an RHEL5 DVD image: (504) ~ $ sudo umount /mnt (505) ~ $ sudo mount_cd9660 -v /dev/cd0 /mnt using starting sector 512 mount_cd9660:

Re: immense delayed write to file system (ZFS and UFS2), performance issues

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 03:24:49AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: WD2001FAAS - WD Caviar Black, 2TB, 64MB, 7200rpm Do you mean WD2001FASS? I can't find a WD2001FAAS. Thanks, Gary ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Vulnerability question

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 07:32:37PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 05:08:32PM +0200, Harald Weis wrote: On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:40:52PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:56:54PM +0200, Harald Weis wrote: Building lxdvdrip stops because

Re: cvsup.uk.freebsd.org appears to not be serving

On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 09:26:57AM +0100, John wrote: Hi list, hopefully this is the right one and not -questions cvsup.uk.freebsd.org appears to have not been serving these last few weeks. I get, variously, in my logs: Parsing supfile /etc/cvsupfile Connecting to cvsup.uk.freebsd.org

Re: magic disappearing coredumps

On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 01:21:18AM +1000, Horst G?nther Burkhardt III wrote: I'm trying to debug a piece of software. It dumps a core file which mysteriously vanishes. it's not in the program directory, nor my $HOME, nor /var/crash nor /var/core ... Deliberately crashing /bin/sh also results

Re: 7.1, mpt and slow writes

On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 01:48:46AM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Gary Palmer wrote: On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:43:11PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote: [ snip ] Any idea what happened to the sysctl? Is there some other method to verify the loader tunable took

Re: 7.1, mpt and slow writes

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:43:11PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote: [ snip ] Any idea what happened to the sysctl? Is there some other method to verify the loader tunable took (other than testing the throughput)? Boot with -v. If the loader tunable took effect, you should see Enabling SATA

Re: Broken loader on 7.1-STABLE?

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 06:22:00PM -0700, John Rushford wrote: Hello, Perhaps mine is a different issue but I ran into this today. I loaded FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE from a DVD onto an Apple Mac Pro after partitioning a drive with bootcamp. The install went quite well and the machine came up

Re: Problem with dump stalling

On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 01:58:39PM +0200, David Peall wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy Chadwick Sent: 09 October 2008 12:45 PM To: Christoph Schug Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; David Peall

Re: pf rules not being loaded during boot on 7.1-PRERELEASE

On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 04:17:03AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 09:57:55PM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote: I recently upgraded my i386 router from 7.0 to 7.1-PRERELEASE. I rebooted it today but despite pf_enable=YES being in /etc/rc.conf no rules got loaded during

Re: resource leak

On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 04:50:46AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 07:41:56AM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote: Hello List, I am running into a strange problem that points to a resource leak. The problem manifests itself after one of our remote systems has been up

Re: recommended setup for amd64 7-STABLE with ZFS, Samba 3.2 and possibly ACLs?

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 03:46:05AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: - email (imap) I've had good experience with dovecot; I tend to stay away from Cyrus products (disgusting code with a history of security issues), and Courier (no interest). Also avoid /usr/ports/mail/imap-uw. I'm not sure

Re: 7.1-PRERELEASE : bad network performance (nfe0)

On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 01:43:12PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have the same problem on a Dell Poweredge SC440 when I transferred over 50GB from a FreeBSD 5.4 box to my new Dell running 7.1. Used a crossover cable and the link was 1000 full duplex, but could only get about 10M/s. Very

Re: sysctl maxfiles

On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 07:05:08PM +1000, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: On 27/09/2008, at 1:02 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Anyway, I'd like to know why you have so many fds open simultaneously in the first place. We're talking over 11,000 fds actively open at once -- this is not a small

  1   2   >