Re: Curious failure of ZFS snapshots

2008-11-21 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:39:20 + Pete French [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Curious failure of ZFS snapshots: PF On the box with the snapshots being created every day with the same PF name I quickly end up with unavailable snapshots, and the error PF message: 'Bad file descriptor'. On the

Re: Curious failure of ZFS snapshots

2008-11-21 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:15:18 +0100 Gerrit Kühn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Curious failure of ZFS snapshots: GK Right now 3 of them are fine, and one is showing the same problem you GK described: GK GK mclane# ll /tank/home/pt/.zfs/ GK ls: snapshot: Bad file descriptor GK total 0

Re: Curious failure of ZFS snapshots

2008-11-21 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:02:07 +0200 Nikolay Denev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Curious failure of ZFS snapshots: ND I've experienced this problem in the past : ND http://markmail.org/message/tmle6lqmkfit46ho Yes, that looks quite the same (even the panic). ND But the machine I was having

Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?

2008-10-31 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:12:04 -0400 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?: Hi, I'm back. Sorry for taking so long with the answer, but I had some holidays and needed to catch up with lots of other things first. JB Are you sure you aren't using dual consoles

Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?

2008-10-14 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:27:40 -0400 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?: JB On Monday 13 October 2008 03:09:46 am Gerrit Kühn wrote: JB JB Ok, can you run gdb on your kernel.debug and do JB JB 'l *0x804608c0' JB 0x804608c0 is in scheduler

Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?

2008-10-13 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:22:15 -0400 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?: JB Ok, can you run gdb on your kernel.debug and do JB 'l *0x804608c0' 0x804608c0 is in scheduler (/usr/src/sys/vm/vm_glue.c:670). [...lines 665-674...] Hope this

Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?

2008-10-10 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:05:35 -0400 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?: JB Ok, I added options KDB and DDB to my kernel configuration and JB compiled with SCHED_ULE. However, after hanging the system does not JB react on Ctrl-Alt-Esc. Am I missing

Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?

2008-10-07 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:02:56 -0400 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?: JB Do you have more details about the crash? Are you getting an actual JB panic with messages on the console, or are you still seeing hangs? Like it was before: system just hangs after

Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?

2008-10-07 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 07:25:42 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?: JC Like it was before: system just hangs after displaying the probing JC messages about the CPU cores; next step for a working kernel would JC be mounting of the file systems (and

Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?

2008-10-07 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 11:16:29 +0200 Gerrit Kühn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?: [...] GK If someone can tell me what to do (except for putting ddb into the GK kernel configuration) or point me at some documentation about this, I GK can try getting some useful

Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?

2008-10-07 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:38:01 +0200 Gerrit Kühn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?: [...] GK However, yesterday I upgraded the system to a recent 7-stable GK codebase, and now it locks again hard after probing the CPU cores. My GK setup remained exactly the same, the new

Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?

2008-08-27 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:53:32 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?: JC JB What about disabling apic? Also, are you using a serial JC JB console? If so, can you put DDB in your kernel and when it JC JB hangs break into ddb and do a 'ps' and

Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?

2008-08-22 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:55:30 -0700 Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?: XL Could you please try disabling ACPI and boot? Additionally a 'boot - XL v' may reveal some useful information as well. Just some random XL thoughts. Sorry for being so late, I almost

Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?

2008-08-14 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:55:30 -0700 Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?: XL Could you please try disabling ACPI and boot? Additionally a 'boot - XL v' may reveal some useful information as well. Just some random XL thoughts. Disabling ACPI does not help, either

Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?

2008-08-07 Thread Gerrit Kühn
Hi folks, I have a rather new FujitsuSiemens Esprimo here with an AMD Phenom X3 processor (triple core is somehow strange :-) and a lot of NVidia stuff onboard. I installed 7.0-R, which ran quite well except for the bge driver and snd_hda which both complained. After putting in an extra

Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?

2008-08-07 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008 05:19:40 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Regression 7.0R - 7-stable?: JC I think you misread what he was saying. :-) He's saying that his JC system locks up hard after the kernel prints the SMP: AP CPU #x JC Launched! messages. Exactly. ;-) JC I

Re: broken re(4)

2008-06-12 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:22:28 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: broken re(4): PY Before checking performance of network controller you had to rule PY out other factors like disk I/O. Use one of benchmark programs in PY ports/benchmark. I already did simple benchmarking by

Re: broken re(4)

2008-06-12 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:01:26 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: broken re(4): PY I already did simple benchmarking by using dd if=/dev/zero PY of=file which gave me several 10s of MByte/s under all PY circumstances. Can you recommend one of the benchmarking programs PY

Re: broken re(4)

2008-06-11 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:43:04 +0200 Daniele Bastianini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: broken re(4): DB - copying large files (more than some 100MB) via ssh/scp drops the DB connection due to corrupted MAC on input: DB Disconnecting: Corrupted MAC on input. DB lost connection DB I had the

Re: broken re(4)

2008-06-11 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:26:29 +0200 (CEST) Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: broken re(4): OF On the other hand, I have not been able to get more than about OF 10MByte/s through the interfaces of this particular system. I have OF 1GBit-networking equipment, and the other

Re: broken re(4)

2008-05-30 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Fri, 30 May 2008 13:44:43 +0200 (CEST) Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: broken re(4): OF Talking about this controller: This is also the only board I am OF using with PCI cards (and thus with a PCI riser) at all. I remember OF vaguely that I had a few problems getting the

Re: broken re(4)

2008-05-30 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Fri, 30 May 2008 13:49:24 +0200 Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: broken re(4): WB Typing pci riser card jumper in Google will give you WB many more pages with interesting (or frightening) stuff WB to read. WB Well, if you know how the PCI bus electrically works this kind of WB

Re: broken re(4)

2008-05-30 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Fri, 30 May 2008 13:44:43 +0200 (CEST) Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: broken re(4): OF That rings a bell ... OF I remember reports of riser cards that apparently changed OF the timing on the PCI bus so they were only marginally OF compliant with the spec, or maybe not even

Re: broken re(4)

2008-05-30 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Fri, 30 May 2008 14:03:08 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: broken re(4): PY Since you're running this patch would you post dmesg output related PY with re(4)? Also please post the output of devinfo -rv | grep PY oui. Here is my output with the latest (28th May) patch:

Re: broken re(4)

2008-05-29 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Tue, 27 May 2008 11:45:19 -0400 Michael Proto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: broken re(4): MP Any hints what I should do next to find the culprit? MP I'm running 6.3 on the exact same Jetway board at home, and while I MP haven't been bitten by the DOWN/UP issue I have seen the occasional

Re: broken re(4)

2008-05-29 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Wed, 28 May 2008 17:56:10 +0200 Gerrit Kühn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: broken re(4): GK PY http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/re.HEAD.20080519 GK Somehow the two interfaces seem to interfer with each other. Can I GK provide further information for fixing this? Meanwhile I booted

Re: broken re(4)

2008-05-29 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Thu, 29 May 2008 23:03:01 +1000 Dewayne Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about RE: broken re(4): DG You might try, after rebooting, to physically unplug and replug your DG networking cables. I already did try that one or twice, without any success. DG I have a few EN-15000 and SN-18000

Re: broken re(4)

2008-05-29 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Thu, 29 May 2008 13:10:48 +0200 Dimitry Andric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: broken re(4): DA FYI, that patch doesn't compile, due to a typo... Fix below: Thanks, I will try that patch tomorrow. Meanwhile I have set up two more machines. Now I have 5 ITX systems, each with 2 re-NICs, and

Re: broken re(4)

2008-05-29 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Thu, 29 May 2008 18:52:55 +0200 (CEST) Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: broken re(4): OF In that case I would suspect that the one piece of hardware OF that is misbehaving is broken and needs to be replaced. I agree. I just do not know yet which part is broken. OF The only

Re: broken re(4)

2008-05-29 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Thu, 29 May 2008 19:09:12 +0200 Dimitry Andric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: broken re(4): DA I have 5 ITX systems, each with 2 re-NICs, and only one is behaving DA strange. DA Just as a data point, my ITX board is a JetWay J7F4K1G2E. The ones I have are JW J7F4K1G5 A, I guess. I will

Re: broken re(4)

2008-05-28 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Wed, 28 May 2008 09:28:23 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: broken re(4): PY Any hints what I should do next to find the culprit? PY There were similiar reports on this issue. It seems that it's very PY hard to make re(4) work so many RTL8168/8169/8111 revisions without

Re: broken re(4)

2008-05-28 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Wed, 28 May 2008 09:28:23 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: broken re(4): PY Any hints what I should do next to find the culprit? PY There were similiar reports on this issue. It seems that it's very PY hard to make re(4) work so many RTL8168/8169/8111 revisions

src.conf, WITHOUT-knobs and nanobsd

2008-02-01 Thread Gerrit Kühn
Hi folks, I have just noticed that the NO-knobs were renamed into WITHOUT-knobs and moved from make.conf into src.conf. Can anyone tell me if (and how) this interacts with nanobsd, which uses the following variables: --- # Options to put in make.conf during buildworld only CONF_BUILD=' ' #

Re: T7200 CPU not detected by est

2008-01-22 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:01:02 -0800 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: T7200 CPU not detected by est: JC Jan 18 23:18:14 comet kernel: est1: Enhanced SpeedStep Frequency JC Control on cpu1 Jan 18 23:18:14 comet kernel: est: CPU supports JC Control Enhanced Speedstep, but is not

Re: T7200 CPU not detected by est

2008-01-22 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:47:25 -0800 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: T7200 CPU not detected by est: JC And I can tell the system is significantly slower when idle, which is JC normal. :-) JC So give that a try... First of all, thank you very much for your work and your mail.

T7200 CPU not detected by est

2008-01-21 Thread Gerrit Kühn
Hi folks, I have several systems using T7200 mobile CPUs running under 7-stable. However, EST does not recognize the cpus. When loading cpufreq I get: --- Jan 18 23:18:14 comet kernel: est1: Enhanced SpeedStep Frequency Control on cpu1 Jan 18 23:18:14 comet kernel: est: CPU supports Enhanced

System unbootable after upgrade to FBSD 7

2007-11-13 Thread Gerrit Kühn
Hi, I just upgraded my first system from 6-stable to 7. installkernel and installworld went well. However, the system won't boot anymore. :-( The bootloader still appears, grabs kernel and modules, followed by Can't work out which disk we are booting from. Guessed BIOS device 0x not

Re: System unbootable after upgrade to FBSD 7

2007-11-13 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:38:00 +0100 Gerrit Kühn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about System unbootable after upgrade to FBSD 7: GK Can't work out which disk we are booting from. GK Guessed BIOS device 0x not found by probes, defaulting to GK disk0: GK panic: free: guard1 fail @ 0x6c23c GK from

Re: zfs on FreeBSD

2007-03-22 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:39:57 +0100 Claus Guttesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: zfs on FreeBSD: CG And that's when I'm once again is convinced that the CG FreeBSD-ports-collection is one of the best package-repositories CG around and hence was curious whether some people did actually use zfs

Re: FreeBSD 6.x, NIS, local root password, and nsswitch.conf

2006-11-22 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 09:07:34 -0500 (EST) Mark Hennessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: FreeBSD 6.x, NIS, local root password, and nsswitch.conf: MH I'm a bit unsure about it myself. MH I tried exactly what you suggested, putting files on the compat line MH and before nis for both passwd and

Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2

2006-09-27 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:24:15 +0200 glz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2: G I have seen the watchdog and reset problem on a -STABLE laptop, both em G and iwi. It only occur when I try to connect using Mulberry e-mail G client so I thought it could

Re: re interface broken

2006-08-03 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 09:26:15 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: re interface broken: today, the interface still doesn't work. Is there work going on to fix this, can I provide further information to track this problem I think you should show 'dmesg' and 'pciconf -lv'

Re: re interface broken

2006-08-03 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 19:46:10 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: re interface broken: PY [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:0: class=0x02 card=0x08600e11 chip=0x813910ec PY rev=0x20 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' PY device = 'RT8139 (A/B/C/810x/813x/C+) Fast

Re: re interface broken

2006-08-03 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:58:11 +0200 Gerrit Kühn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: re interface broken: GK PY Would you let me know a if_re.c revison number used to work on your GK PY system? GK I have a working 6.1-stable kernel compiled on 12th of June, so I guess GK if_re.c from that date

re interface broken

2006-08-02 Thread Gerrit Kühn
Hi folks, I've got a notebook (HP/Compaq nx7010) with which I'm tracking 6-stable. Some days (maybe two weeks?) ago my internal network interface (re driver) became inoperational. The hardware shows a link, but nothing goes over the wire. I cannot ping, cannot get a dhcp address, nothing.

Re: well-supported SATA RAID card?

2006-03-11 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 10:30:48AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: The 3Ware cards work really well under FreeBSD. I have dozens I have been using for some time and they work and work well. Highly recommended. Over the years I am sure I have replaced a few dozen dead drives and have not (knock

nfs locking (was: Re: OOO 2.0 compiles but doesn't work properly)

2005-12-01 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:29:02 -0500 Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about OOO 2.0 compiles but doesn't work properly: RH The home directory is coming from a nfs-server, so the user-setup RH should be identical. I already tried to delete .openoffice.org2, RH but that didn't help either.

Re: Anyone with an ste(4) card?

2005-08-26 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:46:49 -0400 John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Anyone with an ste(4) card?: JB Is there anyone with an ste(4) ethernet adapter? I have some fixes to I have several of D-Link 550TX working here... JB the locking for HEAD so that it runs without Giant and no one

Re: Trek Technology Thumbdrive 16MB

2005-05-05 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 10:28:57AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (May 04), Gerrit Khn said: port 3 addr 2: full speed, power 40 mA, config 1, ThumbDrive(0x), Trek Technology(0x0a16), rev 1.00, device ugen0 umass only attaches to devices it recognizes. There are entries

Trek Technology Thumbdrive 16MB

2005-05-04 Thread Gerrit Kühn
Hi folks, has anyone used the subject successfully with -stable? umass(4) mentions the 8MB version, so I thought 16MB should actually work, too. However, when I plug the device in, I just get ugen0: Trek Technology ThumbDrive, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2 and no umass device. usbdevs shows port 3

Re: Trek Technology Thumbdrive 16MB

2005-05-04 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:23:51PM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote: ugen0: Trek Technology ThumbDrive, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2 and no umass device. Any hints how to make this work? You _do_ have scsi disk support (device da) enabled in your kernel ? Yes, I do. I have two SCSI-Controllers in

Re: Trek Technology Thumbdrive 16MB

2005-05-04 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:26:48PM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote: You _do_ have scsi disk support (device da) enabled in your kernel ? And loaded the umass module or have it in your kernel, for that matter ? Yes, of course. As I said before: I have working externel USB-HD, a working

Re: NEC uPD 720100 USB 2.0 controller () not working on FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE i386 (2005-04-23)

2005-04-24 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 02:04:29AM +0200, Raphael H. Becker wrote: The NEC uPD 720100 USB 2.0 controller doesn's seem to work. This controller is on a Longshine LCS-8033H PCI USB Card and is a low cost standard-USB2-controller at my local electronics store. I wrote here about two weeks ago

Re: suboptimal handling of accidentally pulled usb devices (5.4)

2005-04-09 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 07:00:38PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote: This is on 5.4-PRERELEASE/i386, using ehci for the usb2 device. More info available on request. I see exactly the same behaviour here with an iRiver iFP player on 5.4-STABLE/i386, and I'd appreciate improvements in this field,

Re: Strange networking problems after update 5.2.1-5.3

2005-01-04 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:30:26 +1100 Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Strange networking problems after update 5.2.1-5.3: PJ ed0: flags=108843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 PJinet 130.75.117.37 netmask 0x broadcast 130.75.255.255 PJether

Re: Strange networking problems after update 5.2.1-5.3

2005-01-04 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 03:36:53 -0700 (MST) M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Strange networking problems after update 5.2.1-5.3: MWL : I will do so if it's the support for the cards that is broken. MWL However, I : have tried 4 different cards now, and only one of them MWL worked.

Re: Strange networking problems after update 5.2.1-5.3

2005-01-04 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 09:27:34 -0700 (MST) M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Strange networking problems after update 5.2.1-5.3: MWL : Please tell me which information you need. MWL You've likely already sent this before... But can you send a full MWL dmesg with hw.cbb.debug=1 and

Re: Strange networking problems after update 5.2.1-5.3

2005-01-03 Thread Gerrit Kühn
I recently updated my old Compaq Armada 1500c from 5.2.1 to 5-stable. 5.2 worked fine, the update went without any noticable problem according to the docs. 5.3 behaves well apart from a strange networking problem. The notebook lives in a /16 subnet with a /16 netmask and has a 16bit NE2000

Re: Strange networking problems after update 5.2.1-5.3

2005-01-03 Thread Gerrit Kühn
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 13:19:13 + (GMT) Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about Re: Strange networking problems after update 5.2.1-5.3: RW arp things look ok, but I cannot ping the router, though I can ping RW any other host (the same thing I already noticed here at work). But RW my

Strange networking problems after update 5.2.1-5.3

2004-12-30 Thread Gerrit Kühn
Hi folks, I recently updated my old Compaq Armada 1500c from 5.2.1 to 5-stable. 5.2.1 worked fine, the update went without any noticable problem according to the docs. 5.3 behaves well apart from a strange networking problem. The notebook lives in a /16 subnet with a /16 netmask and has a 16bit

<    1   2