On 2009-06-22, ALLnetgroup wrote:
I am trying to add 3 domain name accounts:
domain1.com
domain2.com
domain3.com
to FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE sever with a Static IP the domain names are pointed to
the server via godaddy. What do I need to do to add the domains to the BSD
server?
You
On 2009-03-25, Mikhail T. wrote:
Greg Black ???(??):
On 2009-03-24, Mikhail T. wrote:
That's true. I just wanted to point out, that someone running dump only
(to make backups) is not going to know, whether his dumps are usable
(for whichever of the two reasons), until he needs them
On 2009-03-24, Mikhail T. wrote:
That's true. I just wanted to point out, that someone running dump only
(to make backups) is not going to know, whether his dumps are usable
(for whichever of the two reasons), until he needs them...
Such a person is not making backups and deserves what he
On 2008-06-10, Joe Kelsey wrote:
I have never managed to use burncd with any drive.
Just for the record, I've been using burncd successfully with a variety
of drives from the early days of FreeBSD through to at least 7.0-R, so I
doubt if the above means very much.
Greg
On 2008-03-04, Chris H. wrote:
Yes, adding an entry in /etc/rc.conf that provides 254 IP's now
reveals:
lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 16384
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64
scopeid 0x3inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
On 2007-10-16, Clifton Royston wrote:
Thanks for this very timely mention! The cluster of servers I am
about to upgrade from 4.8 embarrassed cough to 6.2 relies heavily on
NFS to an old Netapp. If I have got to disable rpc_lockd and
rpc_statd, it's good to know that now!
Can I ask,
When I first did an AMD64 install on my then-new 64-bit hardware, I was
happy with the way FreeBSD itself behaved, but seriously hampered by the
huge number of ports that were marked broken for 64-bit architectures at
that time. Eventually, I just re-installed as i386 and went on with my
life.
On 2007-01-17, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 January 2007 at 3:16:44 +0100, Roland Smith wrote:
Personally I like tabbed browsing a lot, but different strokes for
different folks.
It probably depends on your window manager. Tabs are a reasonable
workaround for window
On 2007-01-16, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
The 1.5.x version _is_ working for me. It is 2.0.x that
exhibits severe problems.
I was surprised and annoyed when I found that the reasonably reliable
1.5.x version had been replaced by 2.0, partly because I expected it to
be less reliable and partly because
On 2006-12-22, Peter Jeremy wrote:
[Not picking on Michael in particular, several people have made
similar comments]
On Fri, 2006-Dec-22 00:15:13 -0500, Michael R. Wayne wrote:
THAT is why people who run servers, with jails, quotas, ipfw and
moderate load keep complaining about 5.X and 6.1
On 2006-11-07, Vince Hoffman wrote:
PS try installing ccache to speed up your compiles.
Definitely do not do this, especially if you're having problems
with building something. There are all kinds of subtle things
that break with ccache. Although it can be a great speed boost
when things go
On 2006-10-31, Robert Blayzor wrote:
Is there a way to upgrade/move an already installed i386 installed 6.1
machine to amd64 without completely reinstalling? Is there a procedure
to do so?
Having just gone through the migration in the opposite
direction, I would ask why you want to do this?
On 2006-10-31, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Greg Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2006-10-31, Robert Blayzor wrote:
Is there a way to upgrade/move an already installed i386 installed 6.1
machine to amd64 without completely reinstalling? Is there a procedure
to do so?
Having
On 2006-10-31, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 06:52:27AM +1000, Greg Black wrote:
I found that a very large number of ports that mattered to me were marked
i386 only.
In some cases these designations are obsolete. They will require people-
power to work through them and see
On 2006-10-31, Robert Blayzor wrote:
Greg Black wrote:
Fair enough. In my defence, I'm fully committed at present and
I have only one amd64 machine which I need for my real work. I
can't afford to run it in amd64 mode, because so much of what I
need is currently broken in a 64-bit world
On 2006-10-05, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 07:09:56PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 04:04:47PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 03:21:44PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote:
FreeBSD's USB support has always been somewhat deficient.
On 2005-10-26, Mark Andrews wrote:
Leading zeros are ambigious. Some platforms treat them as octal
others treat them as decimal.
There is nothing ambiguous about the example provided. (Perhaps
it wasn't a good example, but it's always a bug if '04' is not
correctly decoded,
On 2005-10-26, Matt Emmerton wrote:
On 2005-10-26, Mark Andrews wrote:
Leading zeros are ambigious. Some platforms treat them as octal
others treat them as decimal.
There is nothing ambiguous about the example provided. (Perhaps
it wasn't a good example, but it's always a bug if
On 2005-10-07, Murray Stokely wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 03:12:04PM +1000, Greg Black wrote:
To list the most critical issues:
* Many important navigation links (e.g., the Handbook, the
Ports) disappeared from the front page.
The Handbook was added back to the front page hours
This belongs on freebsd-www; reply-to set accordingly.
On 2005-10-06, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 05:37:40PM -0400, Dan Ponte wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 05:33:26PM -0400, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was witnessed plotting the following conspiracy:
On Thu, Oct 06,
On 2005-06-08, David Hogan wrote:
Recently though, I've been playing around with FreeBSD 5.4 on a vmware box,
and I'm beginning to think it may be the way forward in the long run. Having
observed freebsd-stable@freebsd.org for the last couple of weeks, I've
noticed a worrying (to me) amount
David O'Brien wrote:
| When was the last time you used jot(1)? Do you also want it removed from
| your installed system?
Speaking for myself only, I use it nearly every day and I
certainly don't want to see suggestions of removing it.
Greg
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Chad R. Larson wrote:
| This is a place where we UNIX users might be able to do the rest of
| the world a service.
Maybe, but THIS place is FreeBSD-stable and this is NOT the
place to continue this thread. Take it where it belongs,
please.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
This thread has nothing to do with stable -- take it to chat, or
just drop it.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
Jason Andresen wrote:
| Chad David wrote:
|
| On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 09:36:03AM -0500, Jason Andresen wrote:
|
| Also, if your board supports it (it is new enough) try installing
| one of the temperature sensor packages and see what it thinks
| the temperature/fan speed/etc... are.
|
diesel wrote:
| The issuance of Pwd_mkdb is going to be covered in article II. Syncing
| of local password file is going to be done in article II as well as
| integrity checking. This article proves it possible and the means to do
| it. Many organizations use this method to manage their
Sung Nae Cho wrote:
| Thank you all for your generous info on encryption. Hmmm, now I don't
| know what Microsoft actually meant when they advertised Windows NT, 2000
| was Truly Secure!
They lied -- as they normally do in the interest of making a
sale to an uninformed user.
To Unsubscribe:
27 matches
Mail list logo
